• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Slicks

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90lx347
  • Start date Start date Jan 29, 2004
9

90lx347

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
32
0
0
Cottonwood MN
Jan 29, 2004
#1
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #1
How big of a slick will fit on a stock 7in rim and not rub the heck out of the wheel wells? im willing to get a spacer if i have too. ive seen some cars in mags with 26x10s but they didnt say if it was mini tubed, or not.
i really dont need to know how big i can go, i just what to know what your using that works, i will have a 347 with 3200 stall, c-4, with 8.8 3.73s with posi.
thanks in advance for your help
 
9

90lx347

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
32
0
0
Cottonwood MN
Jan 30, 2004
#2
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #2
OOh come on no one is running slicks at the track, even drag radial sizes would help
 

91five-o

New Member
Nov 16, 2002
287
0
0
Maple Ridge British Columbia
Jan 30, 2004
#3
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #3
I am running MT ET Streets (26 x 10.5") on 15 x 7 " rims off a V6 Mustang. I call them my "ghetto racing rims." Anyway, I have stock suspension on my 91 GT and they work great !

Rick
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 30, 2004
#4
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #4
91five-o said:
I am running MT ET Streets (26 x 10.5") on 15 x 7 " rims off a V6 Mustang. I call them my "ghetto racing rims." Anyway, I have stock suspension on my 91 GT and they work great !

Rick
Click to expand...
Did you take your Quad shocks off?
 

91five-o

New Member
Nov 16, 2002
287
0
0
Maple Ridge British Columbia
Jan 30, 2004
#5
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #5
willys1 said:
Did you take your Quad shocks off?
Click to expand...

No, just bolted right on with no problems.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 30, 2004
#6
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #6
That's pretty impressive....what year is your car?? I know after i think 1990 when the Ponys came out they made the wheel wells bigger to compensate for the larger diameter rims, but i've never heard of 10.5s not rubbing at least the quads. I'm not doubting you, in fact i hope you're right, cause i'm planning on some BFG DRs later this spring for my 10 holes. Do you have stock springs? By that i mean, do you know if they're the originals or have you replaced them with some fresh factory rate springs?

Ok i'm guessing by your name that your car is a '91? That would explain a little. Can you post some pics of these?
 

91five-o

New Member
Nov 16, 2002
287
0
0
Maple Ridge British Columbia
Jan 31, 2004
#7
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #7
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
That's pretty impressive....what year is your car?? I know after i think 1990 when the Ponys came out they made the wheel wells bigger to compensate for the larger diameter rims, but i've never heard of 10.5s not rubbing at least the quads. I'm not doubting you, in fact i hope you're right, cause i'm planning on some BFG DRs later this spring for my 10 holes. Do you have stock springs? By that i mean, do you know if they're the originals or have you replaced them with some fresh factory rate springs?

Ok i'm guessing by your name that your car is a '91? That would explain a little. Can you post some pics of these?
Click to expand...

You had me thinking there for a minute so I went and checked my invoice for the ET Streets, as maybe they weren't 10.5's. Confirmed they are 10.5's so I don't know what to say. I am running 18 x 9 " rims all the way around on the car, these have caused a VERY LIGHT rub mark on the quad shocks, which is caused by hard cornering only, as there is clearance when the car is straight. The clearance is minimal however it is there. The suspension is stock - except for 1 3/4" lowering springs. Nothing further has been done. I will get my son to post some pics as he is the digital camera wiz in the family. I still relate to the Polaroid Swinger of the 70's !

Rick
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jan 31, 2004
#8
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #8
Sweet...i've still got a Polaroid around here somewhere from when i was a kid...But anyways, at the very least i'd think you'd have to flip the quads to get them to fit on a lowered car, but hey this is good news, as that's the size tire i'm looking to buy. I'm having my 10 holes widened 2 inches in the back by Weldcraft so they'll fit better.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jan 31, 2004
#9
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #9
The 10.5" ET Street isn't a 10.5" tire...that's why it fits well. It's not a bad size for the 7" rim, but an 8" or 9" rim would work a little better and still fit well.

When the wheelwells were widened on the newer cars, that was only in the front...the rears stayed the same.

Oh, BTW...I always wanted to see a car with a set of 10-holes widened in the rear and cut down in the front. Thought it might be interesting. Post pics when done!
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 31, 2004
#10
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #10
91five-o said:
I am running MT ET Streets (26 x 10.5") on 15 x 7 " rims off a V6 Mustang. I call them my "ghetto racing rims." Anyway, I have stock suspension on my 91 GT and they work great !

Rick
Click to expand...
Did they hook well? what was your time?
 

PURESTREET5006

New Member
Apr 1, 2003
349
0
0
In the tech line for tear down"AGAIN"
Jan 31, 2004
#11
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #11
On a 7 inch rim you should be running 26x8.5x15 slick or something close to that size.
 

91five-o

New Member
Nov 16, 2002
287
0
0
Maple Ridge British Columbia
Feb 1, 2004
#12
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #12
The tires hook well, I am the part of the equation that's keeping my 60' from being better. I was only cutting a 1.9 and the car was bogging out of the hole. Didn't have time to experiment with launch rpm's as I developed a slight tranny leak and didn't want to push things. Anyway, I installed a tach and found the factory one to be reading WAY LOW at higher rpms. This would account for my bogging. Should be able to improve the 60' with a higher rpm launch this year.

the ET Street actually only has about 8.3" of contact patch - so they fit well on the 7" rim. My understanding, correct me if I'm wrong, is the ET DRAG in a 10.5" is actually a ten inch wide tire. The sticker that was on the ET STREETS said it could be mounted on as narrow as a 6" rim. Seems a little narrow for my liking however who am I to argue with MICKEY THOMPSON !

Rick
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
S
20x10.5 Rim Fitment Concerns
  • SaviorOneZero
  • Aug 3, 2020
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
823
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Aug 3, 2020
SaviorOneZero
S
Cpp mini sub install
  • 67coupestang
  • Sep 13, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 18, 2021
wicked93gs
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Exhaust Headers - Myths and Secrets...
  • geoklass
  • Jun 20, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2021
WhiteCobra95
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?