• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Speed Density Limitations

  • Thread starter Thread starter 02 281 GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 20, 2017

02 281 GT

Agreed...My wife has great Boobs
15 Year Member
Feb 3, 2009
3,207
1,968
194
Cabot, AR
Jan 20, 2017
#1
  • Jan 20, 2017
  • #1
I'm looking to see what the limitations of the speed density ECMs are. I have a 1990 Grand Marquis that is my daily for which I would like to build a new motor.

This car will just be my daily driver and will never see a track. I'm looking to give it better power than the tired LoPo 5.0 can offer. At the same time, I don't want to just do an HO swap (something that is popular among people who modify these things) when I can do at least an Explorer swap.

I got my hands on an ECM from a 1990 Mark VII. This will allow me to retain cruise control as it's a computer-controlled function on 1990-1991 panther bodies as well as the Mark VIIs. This is a speed density setup. I'd be interested in just doing a MAF upgrade if A9P computers weren't going for at least $250/ea everywhere I look for a used computer that may or may not even still function. I could spend a little more than that and get a DIY MS kit, but I'm not looking to get that deep into things just yet. It'd like to keep it all plug and play for the sake of simplicity and frugality.

Would an Explorer engine/intake, 65mm TB and an XE258HR cam be too much for the speed density computer to cope with? I know the speed density system is dependent on good manifold vacuum for reference with the pre-programmed VE tables, which is why I would go with the 258 grind that has 114° lobe separation; not far off from the stock HO 115°. It's a very mild cam; I'd rather go with this one than a stock HO cam as a new HO cam is just as much as an aftermarket piece. I'm really asking if the GT heads and Explorer intake/throttle body would flow too much for the SD ECM.

I have very little experience with ECMs and any heavy modding, so any advice y'all can give would be appreciated. Thanks.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,824
10,503
203
polk county florida
Jan 20, 2017
#2
  • Jan 20, 2017
  • #2
Lets see if @Noobz347 thinks you'd get some advice in the tech section
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Jan 20, 2017
#3
  • Jan 20, 2017
  • #3
02 281 GT said:
I'm looking to see what the limitations of the speed density ECMs are. I have a 1990 Grand Marquis that is my daily for which I would like to build a new motor.

This car will just be my daily driver and will never see a track. I'm looking to give it better power than the tired LoPo 5.0 can offer. At the same time, I don't want to just do an HO swap (something that is popular among people who modify these things) when I can do at least an Explorer swap.

I got my hands on an ECM from a 1990 Mark VII. This will allow me to retain cruise control as it's a computer-controlled function on 1990-1991 panther bodies as well as the Mark VIIs. This is a speed density setup. I'd be interested in just doing a MAF upgrade if A9P computers weren't going for at least $250/ea everywhere I look for a used computer that may or may not even still function. I could spend a little more than that and get a DIY MS kit, but I'm not looking to get that deep into things just yet. It'd like to keep it all plug and play for the sake of simplicity and frugality.

Would an Explorer engine/intake, 65mm TB and an XE258HR cam be too much for the speed density computer to cope with? I know the speed density system is dependent on good manifold vacuum for reference with the pre-programmed VE tables, which is why I would go with the 258 grind that has 114° lobe separation; not far off from the stock HO 115°. It's a very mild cam; I'd rather go with this one than a stock HO cam as a new HO cam is just as much as an aftermarket piece. I'm really asking if the GT heads and Explorer intake/throttle body would flow too much for the SD ECM.

I have very little experience with ECMs and any heavy modding, so any advice y'all can give would be appreciated. Thanks.
Click to expand...
In my very very limited opinion...it should work. There were a few similiar combos in the mustang pre-MAF world. Not sure if that particular ecu has different "tuning" parameters. Do you have a fall back vehicle to dd? Could try it and if it doesn't work...go MS? Just have some possible (more) down time.
 

02 281 GT

Agreed...My wife has great Boobs
15 Year Member
Feb 3, 2009
3,207
1,968
194
Cabot, AR
Jan 20, 2017
#4
  • Jan 20, 2017
  • #4
A5literMan said:
In my very very limited opinion...it should work. There were a few similiar combos in the mustang pre-MAF world. Not sure if that particular ecu has different "tuning" parameters. Do you have a fall back vehicle to dd? Could try it and if it doesn't work...go MS? Just have some possible (more) down time.
Click to expand...
I still have my '95 Mustang to drive when I need it, so yes. Thanks!
 
Reactions: A5literMan

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,878
21,054
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 20, 2017
#5
  • Jan 20, 2017
  • #5
I think if it were me, I'd put together the list of part for the build then head over to my favorite cam website (whichever that may be) and fill out their cam sheet.

Let those dudes know what your parts and EEC are and let em do the rest.
 
Reactions: hoopty5.0 and A5literMan

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,756
6,925
214
SW Houston
Jan 20, 2017
#6
  • Jan 20, 2017
  • #6
I used to think the factory SD computers were useless as far as accepting mods, but my buddy has an SD f150 with an F cam that gets 16 mpg.

With that said, you can find A9x computers for way less than you mentioned. If it were me, I'd swap to a MAF harness if I wanted trouble free PNP function that I wouldn't need to mess with
 
Reactions: 02 281 GT
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • Friday at 3:10 AM
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
37
Fox Engine Swaparoo Friday at 7:55 AM
AeroCoupe
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
289
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
116
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Saturday at 10:31 PM
Mcmahst
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
457
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?