• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Steel Underdrive pulleys vs aluminum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mob
  • Start date Start date Mar 4, 2009

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Mar 4, 2009
#1
  • Mar 4, 2009
  • #1
Is there really a difference between steel or aluminum besides the probable .5 weight difference?
 

Wallzy

New Member
Aug 20, 2006
128
0
0
Orlando, FL
Mar 4, 2009
#2
  • Mar 4, 2009
  • #2
If they are the same dimensions then the aluminum will drain less power - might be im-measure-able though:

T=angular accerlartion*inertia
HP = T*RPM/5252

Walz
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Mar 4, 2009
#3
  • Mar 4, 2009
  • #3
Why do they drain less power? Because they are lighter? I see the equation but it doesnt explain why it drains less power. I guess im just trying to ask are they really worth twice the price?
 

aar0s

Founding Member
Dec 20, 1998
1,015
55
69
Mar 4, 2009
#4
  • Mar 4, 2009
  • #4
the ones i bought on ebay were only like 10 bucks more. i didnt get a chance to weigh them but they seemed a bit lighter than the stockers.
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Mar 4, 2009
#5
  • Mar 4, 2009
  • #5
i'm sure there's an argument to be made for rotational mass/parasitic drag somewhere, but you won't hear it from me concerning such small disparities in weight, diameter of the pulley is what you should be concerned with, in my opinion
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Mar 4, 2009
#6
  • Mar 4, 2009
  • #6
thanks thats what I figured
 

Wallzy

New Member
Aug 20, 2006
128
0
0
Orlando, FL
Mar 5, 2009
#7
  • Mar 5, 2009
  • #7
If they are te same dimensions and the aluminum one weighs less then it will have a lower moment of intertia. If it's interita is lower it will require less torque to accelerate it and horsepower is a function of torque and RPM, but in my opininon it will be in the noise.

Walz
 

93tealstang

Founding Member
Jan 24, 2002
1,242
1
39
McSherrystown/Hanover Pennsylvania
Mar 5, 2009
#8
  • Mar 5, 2009
  • #8
1991notchbackLX said:
i'm sure there's an argument to be made for rotational mass/parasitic drag somewhere, but you won't hear it from me concerning such small disparities in weight, diameter of the pulley is what you should be concerned with, in my opinion
Click to expand...


I couldn't have said it better myself. From experience, I've ran both only noticed one thing. The aluminum's wear much faster than the steel's, mainly the water pump pulley. It wore very thin over time and caused me to ditch the whole set in exchange for steel's.
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Mar 6, 2009
#9
  • Mar 6, 2009
  • #9
thanks 93teal for that info
 

Mustang78

New Member
Feb 8, 2006
486
0
0
Aberdeen, WA
Mar 6, 2009
#10
  • Mar 6, 2009
  • #10
wear is the only issue i know of, i went with aluminum BBK's because of quality and looks.. they dont come with a PS pump pulley though FYI, i run a flaming river manual rack so its not a problem. I will always buy aluminum for no other reason than looks, steel work just as good but dont look nearly as nice, my BBK water pump pulley is in a box now because i had to buy a ribbed pulley to keep the belt from slipping on the smooth one(because i run from crank to water pump, to alternator then back to crank...) PM me for more info
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Mar 7, 2009
#11
  • Mar 7, 2009
  • #11
After seeing this thread I say steel
http://forums.stangnet.com/777990-pully-ripped-half.html
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Mar 7, 2009
#12
  • Mar 7, 2009
  • #12
Damn nuts, never having researched this I would have thought the aluminum's would have been better because their half the price. I guess its just all looks. Thanks for the info guys, I am defiantly going steel when I get my 3g and electric fan on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Engine Removal of Steeda Underdrive pulley
  • THughes
  • Jun 30, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
80
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jul 4, 2026
Dino Dino Bambino
Engine Underdrive pulleys
  • Mindseye007
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
843
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 14, 2026
Willybill32
89 LX Electrical Troubles
  • fun331
  • Oct 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
353
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 27, 2025
fun331
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
902
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
832
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?