• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

T-45.... T-50 ????

  • Thread starter Thread starter p0opstlnksal0t
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2003
P

p0opstlnksal0t

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
24
0
0
houston
Dec 7, 2003
#1
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #1
what is the difference between the '96-'97 t-45 trans. and the '98 t-50 trans.? i thought 96+ manual transmissions were all the T-45?
 
T

tangerine

Member
Apr 6, 2003
555
0
16
millen, ga
Dec 7, 2003
#2
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #2
I am not 100% percent sure but I think that all of them were t-45. A t-50 is the exact same thing as a t-5. Those only come in the fox bodies and I think 94-95 models. t-5 stands for a five speed without overdrive. t-45 is a 4 speed with a overdrive.
 
P

p0opstlnksal0t

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
24
0
0
houston
Dec 7, 2003
#3
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #3
i was told this by the mechanic at the ford dealership? i thought they were all t-45 as well. but was told otherwise by the dealership? maybe he doesnt know n e thing, then again.. he sounded like he knew what he was talkin about, and he is an ase certified master mechanic.

trey
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Dec 7, 2003
#4
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #4
sometime around '98 they switched to the 3550 I think, and then to the 3650 not long after. If it's the same T-5 in the f-bodies then it's single overdrive.
 

NitroDuck

I put out on the 1st date
Founding Member
Aug 17, 1999
4,406
0
66
Baltimore, MD
Dec 7, 2003
#5
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #5
i've never heard of a t-50.

the t-5 replaced the srod 4 speed in 83( i believe) and carried over until 96 when the t-45 was used. in 98 the borg-warner t-45 was replaced with the tremec t-45 (mid year). i believe it was '01 when they switched from the t-45 to the 3650.

the 3550 is an aftermarket trans made by tremec.

-derek
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Dec 7, 2003
#6
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #6
thanks for the clarification, I thought they used the 3550 first. What's the difference between that and the 3650?
 

Routs

Member
Aug 10, 2003
144
2
19
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Dec 7, 2003
#7
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #7
The gearing on the 3550 is more aggressive and the tranny is built to handle more horsepower. I'm not sure what the exact numbers are though.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Dec 7, 2003
#8
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #8
Mister Stang said:
The gearing on the 3550 is more aggressive and the tranny is built to handle more horsepower. I'm not sure what the exact numbers are though.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing it's a direct swap too. That's great. I kind of prefer Ford to use the cheaper stuff so the initial buy in is still low. Look at what using premium parts did to the Camaro and the Firebird.
 

GotMustangs

New Member
May 11, 2003
390
1
0
Tacoma, WA
Dec 7, 2003
#9
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #9
Mister Stang said:
The gearing on the 3550 is more aggressive and the tranny is built to handle more horsepower. I'm not sure what the exact numbers are though.
Click to expand...

Actually, not exactly. The TR-3550 is rated at 350 ft/lbs of torque, whereas the TR-3650 is rated at 360 ft/lbs. This is how Tremec's model numbers break down. The "TR" stands for Tremec design. The next two numbers (36 in the 3650) multiplied by 10 is nominal torque rating in ft/lbs. The next number, 5, stands for the number of forward gears. The last number, 0, is the design level, or version. I got this from the Tremec service manual for the 3650. The TKO is the TR-3550 II. It is rated at 425 ft/lbs. I'm not positive, but I believe the T-56 is rated at 375 ft/lbs.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Dec 7, 2003
#10
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #10
the T56 can take at least 420ft/lbs since I saw one dyno that then promptly blow up on the track an hour later.
 

GotMustangs

New Member
May 11, 2003
390
1
0
Tacoma, WA
Dec 7, 2003
#11
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #11
You can get all of the specs on Tremec's transmissions here:

http://www.ttcautomotive.com/English/products/tremec.asp

Hope this helps.
 
P

p0opstlnksal0t

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
24
0
0
houston
Dec 7, 2003
#12
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #12
i thought so... man.. ill stay away from these guys if i need work done on my car!

thanks, trey
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Vib
  • 65er
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
131
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
65er
6
Proper Transmission fluid for a 84nwc t5
  • Sask84gt
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
389
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 10, 2026
Sask84gt
C
Drivetrain T-5 transmission issue
  • Ch3No2
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
355
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2025
2000xp8
Q
Resolved 96 crown Vic ECU in a mustang gt
  • QuickDibbles
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
662
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 27, 2025
Noobz347
H
1966 mustang starter and pulley troubles
  • Hotrods4ray
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
345
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 10, 2026
Realmongo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?