• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

T-5 How Strong

  • Thread starter Thread starter 66+67
  • Start date Start date Aug 4, 2006

66+67

New Member
Aug 4, 2006
28
0
0
douglasville,ga
Aug 4, 2006
#1
  • Aug 4, 2006
  • #1
Im putting a 347 making 425hp and 400 torque can a world class T-5 handle that kind of power??
 

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Aug 4, 2006
#2
  • Aug 4, 2006
  • #2
The question has been asked often. From what I've read, it can take it as long as you don't make hard drag launches with sticky tires. Well, I plan on doing just that when I get my car built up. And if my T-5 breaks, I'll just upgrade to a G-Force.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Aug 4, 2006
#3
  • Aug 4, 2006
  • #3
Some people break them behind stock 5.0 HOs. Others lift the wheels doing mid-11s and hold together.

I wouldn't count on one lasting forever behind a 347 of any kind, but if it's just a hot street car without slick-equipped launches, then it will probably be fine for some time. The lighter the car, the easier it is on the trans. Early Mustangs are on average a few hundred pounds lighter than a 5.0 Fox3.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 5, 2006
#4
  • Aug 5, 2006
  • #4
it is all in how you treat the trans. i have seen nwc T5's last several seasons in 9 second drag cars, and i have seen people break the good early top loaders with stock small blocks. if you are a ham handed driver, then the T5 is not for you, unless you get one from g-force or other T5 builder. if on the other hand you can drive cars with bad parts and never break them, then go for the T5.

one more thing to remember, the T5 has only so many powershifts in it, so when you break it, build a stronger one.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Aug 5, 2006
#5
  • Aug 5, 2006
  • #5
On a G-Force, it may be more cost effective to start shopping for Tremecs at that point. A G-Force gearset alone is nearly the cost of a 3550. The downside is that a Tremec will need a bigger trans tunnel depending on the car.
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
Aug 6, 2006
#6
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #6
I have a similar setup (347 puttin gout 400 hp and 420 ft lbs) and decided to go with the T5Z which is rated at 330 ft lbs constant. Based on what I have read, the tourque ratings are based on constant stress test, so I was less concerned about the transmission failing since I am not drag racing and won't be abusing it other than the occasional burnout. I considered the stronger Tremec's, but too much fabirication involved to make them work properly. Like others have said, if I break it I will upgrade to G-force.
 
S

SuperSnake428

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
24
0
0
Aug 7, 2006
#7
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #7
bite the bullet

Bite the bullet and get the Tremec TKO 600. Its a STRONG tranny that will hold together. Furthermore, it fits without cutting up the firewall, just a different cross member. You can find them for around 1800 + 200 for the cross member. It'll be the best 2k you'll spend if you have that kind of power. Unique Performance tested these Trannys up to 1200 ft/lb of torque before they broke...
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Aug 7, 2006
#8
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #8
SuperSnake428: not a good idea on a 65/66 as the tranny is too broad for the tunnel. The tunnel must be raised about 2", otherwise a poor driveline angle will result.

Use an aftermarket shifter on a T-5(z) that has stops to restrict the throw - most T-5s are damaged by over-aggressive shifting that damages the forks, or powershifts that eventually trash the gears. Use a good shifter and don't powershift, and the tranny will last. Typically, you can't get enough tire under a 65/66 to hurt a T-5(z) if it's shifted properly. That is, the tranny is rated at 330 lb/ft, but typical tires will break loose before you can get that much torque to the ground.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Aug 7, 2006
#9
  • Aug 7, 2006
  • #9
You could always go with a Richmond 6 speed No problems handling the power and no tunnel cutting to fit it
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Aug 8, 2006
#10
  • Aug 8, 2006
  • #10
You will be fine!

HistoricMustang
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Aug 8, 2006
#11
  • Aug 8, 2006
  • #11
Why anyone would want to upgrade a t-5 is beyond me. When the day is done you will still blow the case. Its like using a late model roller 5.0 block and bandaging it with a "girdle". Its not the bottom end that comes apart . . .

Aside from my opinion , the point has been made.

1. DON'T powershift it
2. DON'T dump the clutch at the strip with ET whatevers
3. DON'T force it into third
4. DON'T powershift it

a friend of mine has a 90 lx with a 347 that put down 301 rwhp and 360 rwtq with the t-5. No problems as of yet but its only seen 285/35/18 sumitomos.

It went a 8.4x at 87 not too long ago . . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
T-5 trans in a Fiat
  • Jim Shipsky
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
155
Other Auto Tech Oct 18, 2025
Mustang5L5
L
93 2.3L 5 speed manual with los of power
  • leadfoot67217
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
0
Views
144
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jan 27, 2026
leadfoot67217
L
C
Drivetrain T-5 transmission issue
  • Ch3No2
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
350
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2025
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
701
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
481
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?