• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

talk to me about the 351w

  • Thread starter Thread starter electricgreen
  • Start date Start date Jan 31, 2004
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Jan 31, 2004
#1
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #1
So we (finally) decided what to do with the mach's motor issue. Since the original 302 is toast, we had to choose between another 302, or another motor. Since we are building Eleanor, we decided we might as well have the right motor (351w). Now, on to the finding of one.

What years are the best? What years should we be looking for as far as compatablity to existing componants (tranny-c4-bellhousing)? Will the flexplate from the 72 302 work, or do we need one specific to the year 351w we get? Are there certain years that have specific tooth flexplates that will fit in the (157 tooth) bell we have now? Will our headers work?

Lots of questions, I know, but if I had asked this many questions before we bought a 78 302, we never would have bought it due to differences between the 72 & 78....I feel like this guy alot when it comes to motors...
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jan 31, 2004
#2
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #2
Same bell housing and flex plate. Get a 74 or older for serious power. Late model roller block for mild to medium build. Headers are hit and miss from what I hear.
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Jan 31, 2004
#3
  • Jan 31, 2004
  • #3
Just choose any 351 in good shape. The pre 74 blocks are supposed to be stronger but unless you are trying to push 500hp w/o a girdle, you dont have to worry. A 93-95 block would be cool becuase its a roller block and you can have a full roller setup. Lots of the stuff is interchangeable, such as bellhousings, flywheel/flexplates...

I personally dont think the year of the block really matters. I would look into a stud girdle if you plan on making some good power out of the motor on any block.
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
Feb 2, 2004
#4
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #4
Be aware of the differences in cylinder head deck hights from pre 1977 and post 1977.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 3, 2004
#5
  • Feb 3, 2004
  • #5
brianj5600 said:
Same bell housing and flex plate. Get a 74 or older for serious power. Late model roller block for mild to medium build. Headers are hit and miss from what I hear.
Click to expand...
I don't know about any "misses" but I bought Headmann Elite for a 351W in a 67-68 and they fit like a dream. I got them on in 30 minutes too! Plenty of room for early model starter (I'm using a late one) and clutch linkages if needed. There's a few pictures of them on my Rack and Pinion page:

http://www.edbert.net/randp.htm
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 3, 2004
#6
  • Feb 3, 2004
  • #6
all 351w blocks are good, with the roller cam blocks being the best bet as you dont have to use a retrofit kit to get a roller cam. as for cylinder heads though you would be better off getting either an early set, or an aftermarket set.
 
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Feb 3, 2004
#7
  • Feb 3, 2004
  • #7
We were planning on going for older (69-72), because of the lack of emissions requirements in those years. I'm starting to wonder if the newer roller motors would still be emissionsless on vans & trucks (no brackets there for emissions equip. Ny is getting funny about thier inspections laws, and I don't want problems later because there's a place for the equipment, even if was never there on the car!)

Thanks for the replies! Anyone know the HP rating on the roller motors? Easy to convert to carbed?
 

imshaggy2000

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
960
0
0
Orange, CA
Feb 4, 2004
#8
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #8
electricgreen said:
We were planning on going for older (69-72), because of the lack of emissions requirements in those years. I'm starting to wonder if the newer roller motors would still be emissionsless on vans & trucks (no brackets there for emissions equip. Ny is getting funny about thier inspections laws, and I don't want problems later because there's a place for the equipment, even if was never there on the car!)

Thanks for the replies! Anyone know the HP rating on the roller motors? Easy to convert to carbed?
Click to expand...

You handy with a grinder at all, I wouldnt worry about any emissions junk unless you plan on keeping everything bone stock. Hp ratings on the roller motors are going to be out of wake as they where all in trucks, so they are not at all camed like you probably would in a mustang. The blocks are really hard to come by and expensive. Yes they are easy to convert to carb just swap the intake, coil, and distributor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Starter and clutch question
  • Texas275
  • Feb 21, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
9
Views
309
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 3, 2025
LILCBRA
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
321
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
329
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
575
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
E
Alternative IACs?
  • Ethereal_Zer0
  • May 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
586
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 7, 2025
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?