• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

TB worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JPstealth
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

JPstealth

Member
Nov 21, 2007
34
0
7
Nothern NJ
May 5, 2009
#1
  • May 5, 2009
  • #1
I know there have been tons of threads on this but I am just hesitant since I am a poor college student. I have pretty much every bolt on except this. Its really not that expensive if the gains are right.

I do have a intake, larger MAF, and entire reichard racing manifold/plenum, from the previous owner. I know how the mani really doesn't help me being NA until high RPM's since it is for primarily boosted applications. So would a 75mm throttle body be advantageous to my set up or is it going to be that same maybe 5hp gain i keep reading about?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 5, 2009
#2
  • May 5, 2009
  • #2
With your other bolt ons, a 75mm T/B would net you about 5-10hp at this point. If anything, the Reichard Racing manifold and C&L MAF Meter is probably the bigger waste at this point...but I realize they were on the car when you bought it. If you're looking for any real power beyond this point, I'd start saving for a real power adder like nitrous or forced induction. This is what's going to make all of your other suporting mods you've got up till this point really shine!
 
2

2003_GT

New Member
Nov 5, 2008
69
0
0
Santa Fe, NM
May 5, 2009
#3
  • May 5, 2009
  • #3
I think a 75mm is too big for a N/A applications, you wont really see much gains you might even lose some power at the top of the RPM band (i think so dont quote me on this) if you plan on stayin N/A just go with a 70mm i think that should be perfect

Hopefully some other stang members with a lot more knowledge and experience with such things will chime in :SNSign:
 

Pnyxprz02

New Member
May 11, 2008
13
0
0
Birmingham, Alabama
May 5, 2009
#4
  • May 5, 2009
  • #4
Dude you need to just buy a JLT cold air kit. It made a huge difference on my car. It relocates the mass air and filter into the fender. I felt a nice gain across the rpm band. I only have the 70mm tb, C&L intake, pullies, mac prochamber, flowmasters, 3.73 gears, and sct xcalibrator. You would really enjoy it.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
May 6, 2009
#5
  • May 6, 2009
  • #5
I felt a nice gain with my Accufab TB and Plenum when my car was naturally aspirated. I went for the 75mm version btw.


Come to think of it, I still have that thing lying in my basement some where. Do you want it? PM me if you do.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
May 6, 2009
#6
  • May 6, 2009
  • #6
I don't believe that a 75 will result in poor performance by any means.

Just received my accufab tb/bbk plenum that I ordered off of ebay Of course I went with the 75 due to the blower.
 

ErikTheBeast

Member
Apr 12, 2006
124
0
16
Kansas City MO
May 6, 2009
#7
  • May 6, 2009
  • #7
Im running a Trickflow 75mm and Plenum. Id say its worth it of course anything to make more HP is worth it in my book.
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
May 7, 2009
#8
  • May 7, 2009
  • #8
You certainly wont lose any power with a 75. I have a 75mm on mine, but that is becuase I plan on getting a blower eventually. If you plan on getting a power adder go with the 75, if not, I think a 70 shuold be fine.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 7, 2009
#9
  • May 7, 2009
  • #9
There's no real disadvantage to going with the 75mm over the 70mm in this case. Flow will be improved (and probably warranted with that intake) and throttle response will remain as crisp as ever. Unlike OHV engines, modulars don't suffer negative side effects from large throttle body swaps. If you're going to buy one, go right for the 75mm.
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
May 7, 2009
#10
  • May 7, 2009
  • #10
Exactly...and they are usually the same price as a 70mm one. I have a Trickflow 75mm TB and Plenum on my GT.
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,288
372
164
Joplin, Missouri
May 7, 2009
#11
  • May 7, 2009
  • #11
I too am running a 75 and its screams from down low to up top.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
May 7, 2009
#12
  • May 7, 2009
  • #12
Yup no reason not to go bigger, if I was in the market for a TB then I would go with BBKs new 78mm.
 

ErikTheBeast

Member
Apr 12, 2006
124
0
16
Kansas City MO
May 7, 2009
#13
  • May 7, 2009
  • #13
scupking said:
Yup no reason not to go bigger, if I was in the market for a TB then I would go with BBKs new 78mm.
Click to expand...

That thing looks sweet , but since the TB and plenum are one in the same your kind of limited as to what setups you can run.
 

JPstealth

Member
Nov 21, 2007
34
0
7
Nothern NJ
May 7, 2009
#14
  • May 7, 2009
  • #14
hmmm, well it seems it might be worth it and having a srt4 pull on me tonight at 70mph is definitely pushing me even more now those things are pretty quick
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
May 7, 2009
#15
  • May 7, 2009
  • #15
JPstealth said:
hmmm, well it seems it might be worth it and having a srt4 pull on me tonight at 70mph is definitely pushing me even more now those things are pretty quick
Click to expand...

I wouldn't think it would pull on you with you mods...
 

JPstealth

Member
Nov 21, 2007
34
0
7
Nothern NJ
May 8, 2009
#16
  • May 8, 2009
  • #16
scupking said:
I wouldn't think it would pull on you with you mods...
Click to expand...


not sure what was done to it but it wasn't stock.... loud ass turbo and exhaust
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,288
372
164
Joplin, Missouri
May 8, 2009
#17
  • May 8, 2009
  • #17
Srt's are VERY easy to get into the low 13's with very very high mph... Running those from a roll... almost always ends badly for a bolt on car.
 

Silverstang02GT

New Member
Sep 30, 2002
60
0
0
Ft. Myers FL
May 8, 2009
#18
  • May 8, 2009
  • #18
JPstealth said:
hmmm, well it seems it might be worth it and having a srt4 pull on me tonight at 70mph is definitely pushing me even more now those things are pretty quick
Click to expand...

save up some money, add cams and he wont pull on you any more.

I have the accufab 75mm TB/plemum on my car
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
May 8, 2009
#19
  • May 8, 2009
  • #19
Most SRT4 drivers suck. You should be racing them at the dragstrip. I had a "buddy" with a 350 fwhp SRT4 who wanted to race me back when I was N/A. I said sure, and we went to the local strip. He ran a 13.8 @ 110 to my 13.6 @ 104
 

stangalator

New Member
Mar 3, 2009
18
0
1
NY
Jun 26, 2009
#20
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #20
if your engines were running at 100% efficiency (N/A of course) the most cfm we will need at 6000 rpm is around 480-500. When I was looking up the flow charts for the aftermarket plenums and tb, all of them flow over 500+ (besides C&L...) I think this is why the 70mm vs 75mm makes no difference in N/A applications. I can't find any cfm data on the bbk 78mm though...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
305
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
380
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
507
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?