• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

The best octance for GT ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter v8tang
  • Start date Start date Oct 8, 2010
V

v8tang

New Member
Oct 7, 2010
2
0
0
Oct 8, 2010
#1
  • Oct 8, 2010
  • #1
Hi

what is the best gas octance for the gt ?

does higher octane improve my performance ?

thanks
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Oct 8, 2010
#2
  • Oct 8, 2010
  • #2
no, 87 is fine... in fact higher octane fuel may actually hurt performance ever so slightly.
 

KBExperience

Active Member
Jun 21, 2009
466
1
49
Houston
Oct 8, 2010
#3
  • Oct 8, 2010
  • #3
87 is best, UNLESS you have your car tuned for 93, then 93 will help your performance
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Oct 8, 2010
#4
  • Oct 8, 2010
  • #4
87
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Oct 9, 2010
#5
  • Oct 9, 2010
  • #5
This question comes up routinely, and there are a few opinions. Basically, higher octane will not hurt, but may not have any benefit.

Higher octane provides more resistance to detonation. Unless you currently see dotonation, higher octane will not deliver a significant benefit.

On the other hand, Car & Driver did a comparison in 2003 with several vehicles designed for 87 octane. They did a performance comparison with 87, drained the tank, then filled with 91 octane. Surprisingly, most of the vehicles showed measurable benefits from the higher octane. A 2003 Mustang GT was one of the test vehicles that showed an improvement on the drag strip. A Honda Accord performed worse on the higher octane. Go figure. I think the bottom line is you shouldn't expect any major benefits. But they may exist for you. I get better mileage on long trips with higher octane, and the engine seems to run smoother. The mileage (~+2 mpg) is measureable and repeatable, but I have no way to quantify "engine smoothness."


The owner's manual of my 93 Celica stated that "some detonation is normal," so if that is the case, eliminating it with higher octane can show mileage and power benefits. I don't know how common detonation is with our cars on 87 octane under "normal" conditions.
 

Jacob_Royer

Member
Nov 24, 2007
142
1
19
Oct 11, 2010
#6
  • Oct 11, 2010
  • #6
260k on my mustang after 750 miles a week every week i think ive tried every octane of fuel several times and i actually loose 1/2mpg with premium. I have NEVER experianced spark knock on 87 that i know of...
 

Sonic04GT

Member
Nov 1, 2009
844
2
19
West Palm Beach, FL
Oct 11, 2010
#7
  • Oct 11, 2010
  • #7
Is there any worthwhile advantage on switching from 87 to 93 for tuning purposes? My car has pretty much full bolt ons as you can see in the sig.

Do the benefits of a 93 Octane Tune outweigh the additional price in fuel? I have the default Diablo 87 tune right now but didn't really notice a difference.
 

txredgt

10 Year Member
Oct 26, 2009
1,343
33
69
Oct 11, 2010
#8
  • Oct 11, 2010
  • #8
Sonic04GT said:
Is there any worthwhile advantage on switching from 87 to 93 for tuning purposes? My car has pretty much full bolt ons as you can see in the sig.

Do the benefits of a 93 Octane Tune outweigh the additional price in fuel? I have the default Diablo 87 tune right now but didn't really notice a difference.
Click to expand...

I have the tuner set for 91 and I use 89 mostly. I don't notice a difference at all in performance between them, maybe at most 5 hp? If your car is tuned really tight then it would make a difference but other than that I personally don't see it. Maybe someone with more knowledge than myself will chime in.
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Oct 11, 2010
#9
  • Oct 11, 2010
  • #9
Unless you're tuned for higher octance, stick with the cheap stuff.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,236
17,922
224
Massachusetts
Oct 16, 2010
#10
  • Oct 16, 2010
  • #10
If you are stock....stick with 87


I wish in had a car that could run on 87.

I went from a v8, getting 27mpg highway on 87, to a v6 getting 25 mpg highway on 91+ octane.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Oct 17, 2010
#11
  • Oct 17, 2010
  • #11
Mustang5L5 said:
If you are stock....stick with 87


I wish in had a car that could run on 87.

I went from a v8, getting 27mpg highway on 87, to a v6 getting 25 mpg highway on 91+ octane.
Click to expand...


Tell me about it, Volvo says 91 is technically below the minimum the car was designed for. If i drive it hard i average 18-19mpg, if i try to save gas i get maybe 21-22.
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Oct 17, 2010
#12
  • Oct 17, 2010
  • #12
E85
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
205
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
S
Stage 3 clutch rattle
  • stage3
  • May 6, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
48
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
142
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
232
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Fox Block Decode
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jun 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
67
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?