• Mustang Forums
  • Special Production

Mach 1 the mach 1`s competition?? pics!

  • Thread starter Thread starter oogtdude
  • Start date Start date Dec 21, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

oogtdude

Banned
Jun 9, 2002
1,626
0
0
Dec 21, 2003
#1
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #1



GTO http://shotgun1.shackspace.com/gto/
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Dec 22, 2003
#2
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #2
Call me crazy, but I kinda like it, definitly could use a little more character but I like it.
 
R

richhba

New Member
Jan 24, 2000
38
0
0
Killeen, Tx
Dec 24, 2003
#3
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #3
Nice

Kinda like it myself also, Does it come in a 6-speed or just an auto?
 
B

BlackMach1

New Member
Oct 21, 2003
25
0
0
29 Palms
Dec 24, 2003
#4
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #4
I will give GM credit with one thing. The fact that they brought a car back and gave it power like it should have. Unlike the Monte Carlo SS, and the newer Impala's with the V-6. How can you bring back legendary names like that, and give them a V-6??? And then have the nerve to put an SS badge on it???
So..with that in mind, looking at the GTO...good for them. About time.

OTHER THAN THAT, I hate it, and I think it looks like a Grand AM with a weight problem.

STick with the STang.
 
O

Ozman

New Member
May 5, 2002
25
0
0
Edmond, OK.
Dec 28, 2003
#5
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #5
BlackMach1 said:
I will give GM credit with one thing. The fact that they brought a car back and gave it power like it should have. Unlike the Monte Carlo SS, and the newer Impala's with the V-6. How can you bring back legendary names like that, and give them a V-6??? And then have the nerve to put an SS badge on it???
So..with that in mind, looking at the GTO...good for them. About time.

OTHER THAN THAT, I hate it, and I think it looks like a Grand AM with a weight problem.

STick with the STang.
Click to expand...

It looks better in black. The Car and Driver article used kind of a beige colored one, which was very bland looking(kind of like the color beige ) I predict the car will sell well it's first and second year because of the GTO name, then sales will fall dramatically because of the bland looks and the poor reliability. Car and Driver found a lot of quality problems on their re-badged Holden.

I just find it hard to fathom why they made the car so heavy (reportedly around 3800 lbs.). Too much weight to be a good autocrosser.

Oh yeah, one other thing. I agree about the Impala and the Monte Carlo. I've driven the MC and it's a piece of crap. The Impala has the Grand Prix engine and super charger, which I think is worthy. However the front wheel drive is the joke with the SS. 260 HP is just too much for a front drive car.
 

AzDropTop

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2001
138
0
0
Tucson, AZ
Dec 29, 2003
#6
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #6
nice interior-ford could take some classes on that, but overall it looks like a big caviler to me?
 
T

Turbo Matty P

New Member
Dec 30, 2003
12
0
0
Dec 30, 2003
#7
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #7
GTO=bloated RWD cavalier

The only good car to come out of GM's camp this next year will be the Solstice. That should be a true sportscar....that is if they can make it track in a straight line and turn less like a minivan.
 

Angus

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
1,001
0
0
PA
Dec 30, 2003
#8
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #8
oogtdude said:



GTO http://shotgun1.shackspace.com/gto/
Click to expand...

Looks nice inside & out, but since it weighs ~ 3725 lbs, it's kinda fat for my tastes...

I don't like the FAKE DOHC plastic valve covers either...

I can't wait to run into one on the street.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Dec 30, 2003
#9
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #9
Angus said:
I don't like the FAKE DOHC plastic valve covers either...
Click to expand...

Typical Pontiac plastic crap, all of their cars have extra plastic and crap all over the place.
 

ttown

Founding Member
May 30, 2002
815
0
0
Oklahoma
Dec 30, 2003
#10
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #10
the mach 1`s competition and all at about the price of the Cobra
Some how I'm not impressed, there's ton's of Grand Pricks around here
 

blkgt714

New Member
May 3, 2003
142
0
0
LA/Orange County
Jan 2, 2004
#11
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #11
That interior is sharp.. The leather looks like leather, not what Ford gives us.. The exterior is something to be desired..

But I think the GTO is geared towards people that remember the the original GTO.. They've grown older and want a refined car with subdued styling.
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Jan 3, 2004
#12
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #12
cross between a sunfire and grand am - and fat too
 
M

mach1grrl

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
364
0
0
Naperville, IL
Jan 3, 2004
#13
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #13
AzDropTop said:
nice interior-ford could take some classes on that, but overall it looks like a big caviler to me?
Click to expand...


That was my first thought too...I thought it looked like a Grand Am or a Cavalier...I don't like it at all.
 

ttown

Founding Member
May 30, 2002
815
0
0
Oklahoma
Jan 6, 2004
#14
  • Jan 6, 2004
  • #14
Did you see this.......

http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=474&page=1

And since it's 300lbs heavier I'm not too worried. Looks like a repackaged fbody from the dyno.
 

myrez99

New Member
Feb 23, 2003
28
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Jan 7, 2004
#15
  • Jan 7, 2004
  • #15
looks kinda like a soccer mom's car with some balls and no sliding doors!

later
 

Sleeper 362

New Member
Oct 7, 2003
70
0
0
Gso NC
Jan 7, 2004
#16
  • Jan 7, 2004
  • #16
Nice car Can't wait for the first one to make the mistake of messing with me
 
R

RealQuick

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
335
0
0
MA
Jan 12, 2004
#17
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #17
Alot of haters out there...

The manual version will eat up auto Mach1's all day long. They trap 103-104mph which is plenty. If you guys think that 3700lbs+ is too fat, well then I guess you dopnt like the 03 cobra either.

This car wasnt designed for autocross , its a full size sedan for christ's sake. It is a sedan with balls, for those people that dont want to buy a mustang and fit 2 children in the tiny backseat (same with a 4th gen fbody).

Take it for what it is...a heavy sedan with some get up an go. Mustang GT's and auto Mach 1's be scared, other than they arent a problem.
 

ttown

Founding Member
May 30, 2002
815
0
0
Oklahoma
Jan 12, 2004
#18
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #18
RealQuick said:
Alot of haters out there...

The manual version will eat up auto Mach1's all day long. They trap 103-104mph which is plenty. If you guys think that 3700lbs+ is too fat, well then I guess you dopnt like the 03 cobra either.

This car wasnt designed for autocross , its a full size sedan for christ's sake. It is a sedan with balls, for those people that dont want to buy a mustang and fit 2 children in the tiny backseat (same with a 4th gen fbody).

Take it for what it is...a heavy sedan with some get up an go. Mustang GT's and auto Mach 1's be scared, other than they arent a problem.
Click to expand...

I think most would have loved to see the Cobra come out a tad lighter but comparing a Cobra with 360-380RWHP to a GTo with 293RWHP is just crazy It's power to weight baby, they both have the weight but the Cobra has the POWER.

This is just a reworked 02 Fbody if you ask me, the 02 Z made about 300RWHP with the manual tranny and the GTo is about the same. At least 60 RWHP less than the Cobra for about the same money out the door. Plus good luck on spare parts in the future, I don't see this car lasting 3 years of production in this form.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Jan 12, 2004
#19
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #19
Isn't it a coupe not a sedan??

Also, there was a bone stock Mach (auto) at the local track about a month ago who ran 13.5, I wouldn't be that scared of the GTO.
 
R

RealQuick

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
335
0
0
MA
Jan 13, 2004
#20
  • Jan 13, 2004
  • #20
CatmanJJ said:
Isn't it a coupe not a sedan??

Also, there was a bone stock Mach (auto) at the local track about a month ago who ran 13.5, I wouldn't be that scared of the GTO.
Click to expand...

There was one at my track (auto mach1) that ran 13.7@100mph with CAI and DR's.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2003 Mach 1 Wiring
  • JohnnyUtah
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
89
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2026
squeak93
J
High idle 2003 Mach 1
  • JohnnyUtah
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
158
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 31, 2026
JohnnyUtah
J
7
70 Mach 1 with Fluctuating Speedometer below 40mph
  • 70 Mach
  • Oct 19, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
231
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 19, 2026
Realmongo
N
1969 15x10 295's for rear. Modifications needed?
  • normg
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
147
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
GypsyR
G
6
New Member 1969 Mach 1
  • 69Resto
  • Sep 19, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
160
The Welcome Wagon Sep 19, 2025
69Resto
6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • Special Production
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?