• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The Pushrod Hotrod- A Dying Breed

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90lxwhite
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Dec 15, 2014
#21
  • Dec 15, 2014
  • #21
Pushrods...OHC.....eh doesn't matter to me.

All that matters to me is the end result
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Dec 15, 2014
#22
  • Dec 15, 2014
  • #22
Mustang5L5 said:
Pushrods...OHC.....eh doesn't matter to me.

All that matters to me is the end result
Click to expand...
Fair enough
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Dec 15, 2014
#23
  • Dec 15, 2014
  • #23
I heard and read the stated reason Chevy has avoided OHC tech in their V-8's is to keep a low hood line in the Corvette.
After all, what good would it be to have a GM look like a Cobra or a Viper? The new motors sound smooth, but boy are those coil packs ugly!
 

Micheal Nadeau

Active Member
Dec 30, 2013
258
32
49
Savannah, GA
Dec 15, 2014
#24
  • Dec 15, 2014
  • #24
You will be hard pressed to see pushrod motors go by the wayside. Especially considering Chrysler and Chevy have been making over 400 HP in their small blocks for several years now. The engine expense is considerably less than ford dohc motors. When Chrysler and Chevy get into their "hot rod" set up, they are smashing out over 700 hp from production pushrod motors. They will be around for a good long while.
 
Reactions: aar0s and elarm1

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Dec 15, 2014
#25
  • Dec 15, 2014
  • #25
So why'd ford go to ohc again? Oh and back to mm&ff, the new ones main article is, "The Top 10 Baddest Mustangs You've ever Seen." The oldest of the group was a fox. It had a ohc crate motor..
 
Last edited: Dec 15, 2014

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,484
8,696
234
S.I.NY
Dec 16, 2014
#26
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #26
Go on racing sites such as yellowbullet. push rods are alive and well
 
Reactions: A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Dec 16, 2014
#27
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #27
Had a subscription to mm&ff for almost 15 years. Canceled because of their material. Hardly any "old" articles. All the new ohc stuff just got boring to me. I still pick one. Up at the magazine rack
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,974
2,956
194
Middle of Maine
Dec 16, 2014
#28
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #28
It is getting harder and harder (read that as more expensive) to get/keep a pushrod engine within ever tightening emission/fuel economy standards. The OHC architecture is so much more efficient in this matter that it is just nuts. That is the main reason Ford went this route years ago. They could see the writing on the wall. The pushrod engine is almost at the limits of efficiency. I am sure direct injection will keep it viable for a few more years, but at some point GM/Chrysler are going to have to go the OHC route on all of the engines.
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91 and 89oem

Micheal Nadeau

Active Member
Dec 30, 2013
258
32
49
Savannah, GA
Dec 16, 2014
#29
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #29
I would beg to differ on that emission/fuel economy statement. Dodge gets better fuel mileage in their 5.7 pushrod than Ford gets in its DOHC 5.0...... Ford has to sell fuel mileage based on the Ecoboost.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Dec 16, 2014
#30
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #30
oh ya Boost
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,974
2,956
194
Middle of Maine
Dec 16, 2014
#31
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #31
Micheal Nadeau said:
I would beg to differ on that emission/fuel economy statement. Dodge gets better fuel mileage in their 5.7 pushrod than Ford gets in its DOHC 5.0...... Ford has to sell fuel mileage based on the Ecoboost.
Click to expand...
And how do they do that? Oh yea, they cut out cylinders when cruising. Ford does not do that .........yet. A Dodge running on all 8 cylinders does not get as good a fuel economy as the 5.0 it is simple physics. When all 8 cylinders are banging away and you have to feed almost 50 cid more, and the amount of power required to operate the pushrod set up is more than the OHC, well, it is just a losing proposition.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Dec 16, 2014
#32
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #32
Bullitt347 said:
And how do they do that? Oh yea, they cut out cylinders when cruising. Ford does not do that .........yet. A Dodge running on all 8 cylinders does not get as good a fuel economy as the 5.0 it is simple physics. When all 8 cylinders are banging away and you have to feed almost 50 cid more, and the amount of power required to operate the pushrod set up is more than the OHC, well, it is just a losing proposition.
Click to expand...

Uhhhh......I'd venture to say that they shut off the cylinders in an attempt to give you the best of both worlds. Who needs all eight cylinders banging away when the objective is 30MPG regardless of the size of the V8.
 
Last edited: Dec 16, 2014

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,974
2,956
194
Middle of Maine
Dec 16, 2014
#33
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #33
madmike1157 said:
Uhhhh......I'd venture to say that they shut off the cylinders in an attempt to give you the best of both worlds. Who needs all eight cylinders banging away when the objective is 30MPG regardless of the size of the V8.
Click to expand...
I agree, I was just pointing out how they were getting better fuel economy with the pushrod motor and larger displacement. I was making the comparison to show that if it ran on all 8 like the 5.0 Coyote does, then it would not be a contest. When/if Ford ever does this cylinder cut-off thing (I hope not) then it will be game over.
 

Micheal Nadeau

Active Member
Dec 30, 2013
258
32
49
Savannah, GA
Dec 16, 2014
#34
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #34
Meh, both of my '05 Rams got 20-21 mpg and they didn't have MDS. Both 4wd, one with 3.55's and the other with 3.92's
 
Reactions: Adieu

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Dec 16, 2014
#35
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #35
Northstar was OHC variable cylinder... so its been done...and as stated GM cited corvette hood clearance for the push rod direction...

lets face it GM and Chryslers are not shooting stars these days and that has to be a factor in staying with that tech, the vast majority of the automotive world has moved on.

My 5.9 4wd Durango mpg paid for Crawford Ranch... It was cr*p all the way around....
 
Last edited: Dec 16, 2014

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Dec 16, 2014
#36
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #36
Micheal Nadeau said:
Meh, both of my '05 Rams got 20-21 mpg and they didn't have MDS. Both 4wd, one with 3.55's and the other with 3.92's
Click to expand...
Man they must have really improved their economy. I had a 318 Durango that was lucky to get 15-16 hwy and it averaged about 12. That thing sucked and was in the shop 4 times the first year. I hated that f'ing thing and traded it with about 15000 miles on it. Took a killing just to get rid of it.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Dec 16, 2014
#37
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #37
^^^ what 5liter said
 

Micheal Nadeau

Active Member
Dec 30, 2013
258
32
49
Savannah, GA
Dec 16, 2014
#38
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #38
I still have a 318 that gets about 13-14 hwy with 33's
 

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Dec 16, 2014
#39
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • #39
Not bad. Just got back from Philly in my 14 Hemi Citadel Durango 4wd and @ 70 I got 22-23 with 6 and a 1/2 people and some luggage. I love that Hemi!
 
Reactions: A5literMan

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Dec 17, 2014
#40
  • Dec 17, 2014
  • #40
Major improvement, guess Fiat has been good for them.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
92 5.0 Fox Stalls
  • Stonerboys
  • Oct 18, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 22, 2017
Stonerboys
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
Old H/c/i Installation Explanation And Pics
  • FastDriver
  • Jan 26, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2018
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?