• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

They dont fit and im pissed

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98GTBlk
  • Start date Start date Jun 30, 2004

98GTBlk

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
59
0
0
Connecticut
Jun 30, 2004
#1
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #1
This angers me. I have a 98 GT. I just bought AFS Cobra R wheels. 17 x 8 up front and 17 x 10.5 in back. They said it would fit 94- current mustangs. These rims rub on the shock stabilizer (thats what the tire place called it ... see pic) without tire on it. Just the rims themselves are too big. Has anyone with the 94-98 mustang GT got these on there and how? One of the mechanics said there is a replacement part to relocate that stabalizer. So i ran up to mustangs unlimited and asked them about it and they said i dont need that damn thing anyway if i just get lower control arms. So i bought lower control arms, and i go back to the garage. They said that these arms arent gonna do anything to replace that stabalizer. Thus, i accomplished nothing but waste gas Has anyone had experience with this? Can i get replace that stabalizer with lower control arms? Can i just take it out? Will the wheels fit anyway with a spacer? Are spacers ok to use? Any help would be appreciated.

 

Attachments

  • asdf5.webp
    66.9 KB · Views: 528

stallion98gt

New Member
May 12, 2003
1,802
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Jun 30, 2004
#2
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #2
I have the same rims on my 01GT. No rubbing at all and I run 315 BFG.
Maybe the 94-98 have less space, anyways u can get some LCA and get ride of that quad shock or get some spacer if u need a little bit of space.
MY tires/rims combo is about 1"/1.5" from rubbing tho
 

98GTBlk

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
59
0
0
Connecticut
Jun 30, 2004
#3
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #3
The mechanics at the place said that the lower control arms wouldnt do anything for spring hop or something like that. They basically said that the lower control arms wouldnt be able to do the same function that these quads do.
 

Firemanz

Only you can prevent Forest Fires!
Founding Member
Dec 13, 2001
4,105
0
0
San Antonio, TX
Jun 30, 2004
#4
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #4
Have you tried rotating the shocks?
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 30, 2004
#5
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #5
The Mustang shop was absolutely right. You DO NOT need the quad shock if you have good control arms. That quad shock is just there to prevent wheelhop, it doesnt even rebound. Put your new lower controls arms in and ditch the quadshocks.
 

98GTBlk

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
59
0
0
Connecticut
Jun 30, 2004
#6
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #6
The LCA's that i bought are hotchkis performance brand. Supposedly they are pretty good.
 
8

89 KS notch

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2000
1,308
0
0
Topeka KS
Jun 30, 2004
#7
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #7
Ditch the quad shock...
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 30, 2004
#8
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #8
98GTBlk said:
The LCA's that i bought are hotchkis performance brand. Supposedly they are pretty good.
Click to expand...
Those are great LCA's. You will notice a nice difference in traction. Go ahead and install those and ditch the quad shock.
 

98GTBlk

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
59
0
0
Connecticut
Jun 30, 2004
#9
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #9
So are these mechanics wrong, or are they just looking at it from a different standpoint? Example being a 'what works' standpoint over a 'whats safe' stand point.
 
8

89 KS notch

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2000
1,308
0
0
Topeka KS
Jun 30, 2004
#10
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #10
You will be completely safe without them and the new control arms. I know people that box up the stockers and get rid of them or just get rid of them and don't do anything. They only really do anything for you when your getting on it hard or spinning the tires.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 30, 2004
#11
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #11
98GTBlk said:
So are these mechanics wrong, or are they just looking at it from a different standpoint? Example being a 'what works' standpoint over a 'whats safe' stand point.
Click to expand...
They are wrong. Many people ditch them. I have several good friends that have and once I get my new control arms I am ditching mine. Quad shocks only help wheel hop and tire spin. Control arms will take care of that.
 

98GTBlk

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
59
0
0
Connecticut
Jun 30, 2004
#12
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #12
ok i guess im going to throw these new LCA's on there and rip the quads off. Anything i should know? What involved in the process?
 

Red mustang Gt 46

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2001
601
0
16
Good ol' Maryland
Jun 30, 2004
#13
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #13
Upper CAs do more to stabilze (angle) the axle than the LCAs...just FYI, if your that worried about ditching the quads...

ref: http://groups.msn.com/1998redmustanggt46/babysgotback.msnw
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Jun 30, 2004
#14
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #14
Firemanz said:
Have you tried rotating the shocks?
Click to expand...


thats what I'll do.
 

98GTBlk

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
59
0
0
Connecticut
Jun 30, 2004
#15
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #15
do i have to use a spring compressor... is the quad shock under any pressure?
 
8

89 KS notch

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2000
1,308
0
0
Topeka KS
Jun 30, 2004
#16
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #16
No... just put jack stands under the frame of the car and lower the rearend down slowly. This will take any pressure off the springs. The quads are not loaded at all.
 
M

MaxMustang

New Member
Jul 23, 2003
53
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#17
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #17
On my 2K the quads came from the factory mounted oppoisite of what your picture shows.
 
J

Jared306

Founding Member
Mar 9, 2001
247
0
0
Katy, TX
Jul 1, 2004
#18
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #18
I think what the shop meant was that is would have been much cheaper(labor and parts) to just get $30-$40 spacers than get into a debate over the true functionality of the quadshocks. What will probably happen if you remove the qshocks for obstruction is that your tires will rub the inside of the fenderwell anyways. So you might as well plan on getting a spacer regardless of whether you choose to install the LCA and remove the quad shock. I don't like to play Jenga with my Mustang..thats's my .02

Jared
 

kboy262

Active Member
Apr 20, 2003
437
0
26
Atlanta-Kennesaw
Jul 1, 2004
#19
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #19
I have 17*10.5 bullitts on my 98 GT with no problems. All you have to do is flip the quad shock around and that should fix it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
298
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
580
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Suspension Can’t get rid of shake in the wheel
  • Mikes2011GT
  • Sep 19, 2024
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
9
Views
518
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Nov 28, 2024
Bullitt347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
188
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
165
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?