• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Timing Pointer for 67 289

  • Thread starter Thread starter pyroman
  • Start date Start date Aug 8, 2009
P

pyroman

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2002
480
3
18
Ennis, Texas
Aug 8, 2009
#1
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #1
For the 67 289 was the 289 timing pointer built into the timing cover or was it a bolt on accessory? I ask because my timing cover doesnt have one. When I was looking I found some from mustangs unlimited for 68/69 289/302/351W but nothing specifically for 67. Does it matter? I assume I could use this but I want to make sure.

http://mustangsunlimited.com/itemdy01.asp?T1=6023B+01&Category=&catkey=emustang

I'd like it so it will make TDC easier to find for a distributor install.

Thanks.
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
Aug 8, 2009
#2
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #2
The 289 and 302 use the same timing cover, so one in the link is what you need.
 

JonK

Member
Jun 6, 2007
276
0
16
Nashville (Smyrna), TN
Aug 8, 2009
#3
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #3
My '67 has the pointer built into the TC so if you have the later cover with the hole to mount one I'd say you need the one in the link, otherwise you'd have to find a one piece TC with pointer like original.
Jon
 
P

pyroman

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2002
480
3
18
Ennis, Texas
Aug 8, 2009
#4
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #4
This is the timing cover that came off the engine:



The car is a 67 but the engine in it was not original so it could be a later model cover.

Can you tell if this is the "bolt on" style timing pointer cover? I'm not sure.

Thanks
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Aug 8, 2009
#5
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #5
You should have no trouble bolting the pointer on that cover.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 8, 2009
#6
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #6
pyroman said:
This is the timing cover that came off the engine:



The car is a 67 but the engine in it was not original so it could be a later model cover.

Can you tell if this is the "bolt on" style timing pointer cover? I'm not sure.

Thanks
Click to expand...
That's the bolt on cover. The pointer bolted onto that small holed boss on the 2 o'clock position just above the cover bolt hole and the other end attaches with the lower left hand cover bolt. There's a casting number somewhere on the cover, that'll tell you if it's the correct cover for a 67. It will have had a C5, C6 or a C7 prefix. But Ford also used this same basic cover with newer prefixes up into the late 70's. It used a different bolt on pointer that was attached with the lower right hand bolt holes straddling the dipstick tube.
 
P

pyroman

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2002
480
3
18
Ennis, Texas
Aug 8, 2009
#7
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #7
In reponse to D. Hearne, the holes you speak of it bolts to are like what is shown below?



If thats right, how/what threads into the small hole?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 9, 2009
#8
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #8
pyroman said:
In reponse to D. Hearne, the holes you speak of it bolts to are like what is shown below?



If thats right, how/what threads into the small hole?
Click to expand...

Sorry, the other hole is the lower driver's side bolt hole. The small screw in the pic on the Mustangs Unlimited pointer goes into the boss with the small hole you pointed to. I have a habit of referring to stuff on an engine as relates to looking at them from the driver's seat. (that's the left side of the car in my mind) Move the arrow on the left side of the pic to the opposite lowerr bolt hole and you've got both pointed out correctly for that pointer.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Aug 9, 2009
#9
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #9
pyroman said:
If thats right, how/what threads into the small hole?
Click to expand...

The small screw that comes with the pointer goes in the small hole.
 
P

pyroman

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2002
480
3
18
Ennis, Texas
Aug 9, 2009
#10
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #10
I just had a thought...

The engine going into the car is a 5.0L roller motor out of a 1991 Mustang. I'm running a carb setup and a mechanical fuel pump. So I decided to swap the timing cover from the motor that was in there previously (289) as pictured above.

I'm also using my original V-belt pulleys, including the crank from the 289 with this balancer:

Small Block Ford Balancer & Pulley Spacers

That said, do I need the timing pointer for a 5.0L engine or will TDC be true at the point indicated with the 289 timing pointer? I understand they are on the passengers side instead of the driver's side like they were on early model cars.


Thanks
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 9, 2009
#11
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #11
pyroman said:
I just had a thought...

The engine going into the car is a 5.0L roller motor out of a 1991 Mustang. I'm running a carb setup and a mechanical fuel pump. So I decided to swap the timing cover from the motor that was in there previously (289) as pictured above.

I'm also using my original V-belt pulleys, including the crank from the 289 with this balancer:

Small Block Ford Balancer & Pulley Spacers

That said, do I need the timing pointer for a 5.0L engine or will TDC be true at the point indicated with the 289 timing pointer? I understand they are on the passengers side instead of the driver's side like they were on early model cars.


Thanks
Click to expand...
OK, went and looked at the link you posted. It looks like you can go forward with the 50 oz/in balancer and use the 289 pointer as this balancer is marked with timing marks in three locations.
 
P

pyroman

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2002
480
3
18
Ennis, Texas
Aug 9, 2009
#12
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #12
D.Hearne said:
OK, went and looked at the link you posted. It looks like you can go forward with the 50 oz/in balancer and use the 289 pointer as this balancer is marked with timing marks in three locations.
Click to expand...

Ok I just need to clarify one thing for my sanity. The 289 and 302 have different strokes, but will that affect the degree at which the #1 piston is at TDC? In other words if you swap a 289 cover and timing pointer onto a late model 302 block, the pointer will still point at 0 when the motor is at true TDC?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 10, 2009
#13
  • Aug 10, 2009
  • #13
pyroman said:
Ok I just need to clarify one thing for my sanity. The 289 and 302 have different strokes, but will that affect the degree at which the #1 piston is at TDC? In other words if you swap a 289 cover and timing pointer onto a late model 302 block, the pointer will still point at 0 when the motor is at true TDC?
Click to expand...

Stroke doesn't affect the pointer position. TDC (top dead center) is TDC.
 
6

66forfun

Member
Feb 25, 2006
260
0
16
Pittsburgh
Aug 10, 2009
#14
  • Aug 10, 2009
  • #14
I run a roller block 347 with an early 289 cover (pointer cast into cover at 2 oclock).
The 347 is running t.d.c. no.1 @ 11 oclock.
I have a FMS pointer that screwed into the 2 larger holes on the left of the crank, they sell a 10oclock or 11oclock position pointer for roller motors.
You will need to assemble the engine/valvetrain to determine where yours will end up.
you can run the cheap pointer and timing tape on the balancer as an option.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 10, 2009
#15
  • Aug 10, 2009
  • #15
66forfun said:
I run a roller block 347 with an early 289 cover (pointer cast into cover at 2 oclock).
The 347 is running t.d.c. no.1 @ 11 oclock.
I have a FMS pointer that screwed into the 2 larger holes on the left of the crank, they sell a 10oclock or 11oclock position pointer for roller motors.
You will need to assemble the engine/valvetrain to determine where yours will end up.
you can run the cheap pointer and timing tape on the balancer as an option.
Click to expand...

The reason yours ended up at 11 o'clock was due to the balancer being used. All cranks are indexed with the keyway on the front snout indexed to TDC of the #1 cylinder. If you had used a 289 balancer, it would have had the timing marks indexed to a 289 timing cover pointer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Timing Cover/harmonic Balancer Removal And Replacement
  • jrichker
  • May 28, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
16K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 6, 2024
Noobz347
67 Auto To Manual Conversion
  • red'67coupe
  • Jan 29, 2015
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
7K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 31, 2015
horse sence
Grafting 67/68 Shock Towers To 65/66 Mustang
  • dennis112
  • Dec 28, 2014
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
43K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 23, 2019
dennis112
B
A 5.0 Block With Toploader Trans-in A 67
  • boomer300
  • Oct 7, 2014
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
4K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2014
woodsnake
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?