• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

To sell or not to sell, what would you do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ophelia
  • Start date Start date Dec 16, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Dec 17, 2003
#21
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #21
RGS0907 said:
I'm not familiar with the 351's... Do they actually come in different block sizes? I always thought that the basic block was the same & most of the changes were in the heads... How does anyone fit a 351 into a 65/66 without modifiying the shock towers?
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure I have this right by now:

the 351 W & C are based on the 302, the 351 M is based on the 400, so yes, there are 2 blocks.

And a friend of mine has a 351w in his 65, I'm 99% sure he didn't modify the towers for fit....
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Dec 17, 2003
#22
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #22
electricgreen said:
I'm pretty sure I have this right by now:

the 351 W & C are based on the 302, the 351 M is based on the 400, so yes, there are 2 blocks.

And a friend of mine has a 351w in his 65, I'm 99% sure he didn't modify the towers for fit....
Click to expand...

The 351w and 302 and 289 are all members of the same engine family

the 351c the 351m and the 400 are all part of the 335 series.
 
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Dec 17, 2003
#23
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #23
Dammit, I knew the W was related to the 302, and the M was a 400 relative, but I was pretty sure the C was a 302/289 based motor too. Oh, well.
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Dec 17, 2003
#24
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #24
dodgestang said:
The 351w and 302 and 289 are all members of the same engine family

the 351c the 351m and the 400 are all part of the 335 series.
Click to expand...

See that, I've been into Mustangs for over 25 years & it's never too late to learn something new. I really thought that the 351C & 351W mainly had differences in the heads, I never realized that the block sizes were different as well. Thats good to know, thanks.

Bob
 
3

390Fe

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
236
0
0
Pottstown PA
Dec 17, 2003
#25
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #25
The 351m and 400 use a taller deck block than a Cleveland. That may account for the tight fit - That's why I suspect the trans tunnel is battered too - the m uses a 385 series bell housing - not the typical small block ford.
 
O

Ophelia

New Member
Dec 16, 2003
4
0
0
Dec 29, 2003
#26
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #26
Engine pictures

I finally got the engine pictures! I don't know if you can tell a whole lot from them, but opinions appreciated!
Right now we are leaning towards keeping it and eventually putting a new engine in. We just bought a house with a 3 car garage so will have to see how finances are this next year.
Thanks!

<IMG SRC="http://home.att.net/~ophelia1920/engine1.JPG">
<IMG SRC="http://home.att.net/~ophelia1920/engine2.JPG">
<IMG SRC="http://home.att.net/~ophelia1920/engine3.JPG">
<IMG SRC="http://home.att.net/~ophelia1920/engine4.JPG">
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Dec 29, 2003
#27
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #27
Ophelia said:
I finally got the engine pictures! I don't know if you can tell a whole lot from them, but opinions appreciated!
Right now we are leaning towards keeping it and eventually putting a new engine in. We just bought a house with a 3 car garage so will have to see how finances are this next year.
Thanks!
Click to expand...

Is the area where the dizzy mounts raised? it looks it in the pictures but I can't be sure. If it is raised its an 'M'

See how the area where the cooling line and the dizzy mount are all at the same level on this 351c:

 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Dec 29, 2003
#28
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #28
Sentiment is the hardest part of the equasion when making these types of decisions, but the fact that you might not get back what you have into it is a simple fact we are all faced with at any level of restoration, so don't let that be the reason for potentially throwing even more good money after bad. Sometimes cutting your loses is a gain. Given the fact that you haven't even had the time to realize that you can't easily change plugs in over ten years, and now knowing that the previous owner mislead you and was not very compitent by what you have told us and by what I can see in that engine compartment like strange battery position, a way too small radiator with what looks like both a pusher and puller electronic fan, crappy general use hoses and an old single reservoir master cylinder for an upgraded engine swap?!?!??!?!?!?! I would be worried about more and more and more surprises rearing thier ugly head once you finally think it's over and the car actually starts getting used for almost the first time in a decade.

I seriously do not like some of the warning signs I see, and I can say that this is one of the cars I might have walked away from if I looked at it as a candidate for purchase. That being said, and my conscience now clear, let me offer up some thoughts if you are intent on keeping it. First, run all the numbers and make sure you know how that car was supposed to be originally and what you are really dealing with in terms of the unknown PO mods. It could once have been a six that was improperly swapped out for example. If considering going to a 289/302 don't forget you might be able to work out a swap with somone for your current 351. Do some research, you'll likely find someone with an exact opposite case as you since most want to upgrade not down size. Maybe also consider working around the 351, like switching to a rack and pinion steering instead, then the shock towers could be eliminated all together and not an issue any longer. If they are truly banged to hell, this may be a cheaper alternative in the long run and you will have more tech for your buck. Explore all options before commiting is all I am saying.

If I were you, and given your situation/knowledge/ability I would personally consider selling this one off and buying the absolute best car you can afford. A company like www.jjbest.com could help you do just that. Think for a second if you bought say even a $10,000 car that was 90% or more restored at least where the mechanical and body were concerned, with only trim and interior tweaks to be perfect in the worst case. A car like that financed for say 5 years would only require you put down about $2000 and the payments would be like $150 a month. That's less than $2000 a year, and you will spend more than that on this car, I can guarantee. Not to mention that the new car would be usable at once and only require regular maintanence for your amount of use. Since you would have a new garage, you would qualify for special insurance like offered at www.haggerty.com and pay some where around $150 a year +/- for total coverage of the car. No stress, no worries, all the pleasure and fun that the hobby has to offer. I look forward to a ground up resto some day, but trust me, I went this route on my first car and have never been happier with my choice, and I am capable of doing almost all my own work. It simply took me way too long to finally get a car and I was not waiting any longer to enjoy it.

This is all just IMHO so take it for what it is worth. At the very least just be open minded and don't let the past cloud your mind, make a clear decision. Good luck.
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Dec 30, 2003
#29
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #29
I would keep the car unless selling it was the only way to keep a roof over your head or food on the table. Fastbacks are going up in value as they are rare and demand has increased because of Eleanor projects and such. You can put that car in the garage and sell it 5 years from now if you wish and it will bring 30% more than it will today. Hope this helps.
 
6

67efivert

Member
Jan 26, 2003
348
0
16
lincolnton nc
Dec 30, 2003
#30
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #30
its hard to say by the pics but it looks more like a c motor to me and with those valve covers it would be bout impossible to change the middle plugs and the stock manifolds scream dented shock towers to make them fit and not to be mean but that wiring scares the heck out of me bunches of red wire???? i mean wiring is no biggie to me but that looks real odd
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
161
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
G
  • Poll Poll
I got a free Mustang from Grandma
  • GrannysMustang
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
14
Views
465
The Welcome Wagon Mar 6, 2026
Realmongo
Classic Car Insurance
  • Willybill32
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
83
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
7-UP BILL
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
102
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
771
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?