• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

transmision problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ponyboy762
  • Start date Start date Jun 2, 2004
P

ponyboy762

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
32
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#1
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #1
I have an 89 coupe with a tremek 3550 trany. The car has been able to start without the clutch peddle being pressed in ever since i've had it. I jacked up the car and found that the reverse sensor isn't there and the hole is plugged with a bolt wrapped with electricral tape. I bought the sensor and i'm waiting for it to come in. My question is, does the fact that this sensor is missing allow the car to start without the cluch being pressed or do I have more than one problem on my hands.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jun 2, 2004
#2
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #2
i dont think that would do it...check your neutral safety switch....i think its at the top of the clutch pedal but the quadrant. see it its broken or just pushed all the way in and stuck
 
P

ponyboy762

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
32
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#3
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #3
Tere isn't a swith, just a loose wire harness.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 2, 2004
#4
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #4
Your car could have been an aod converted to a 5 speed. Look at the clutch pedal, there should be two different wires plugged in, if there is not, look for those wires, they should be up near the pedal taped up from the factory, untape them, plug them in.
 
P

ponyboy762

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
32
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#5
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #5
The quadrent has been replaced with a steeda. I don't know what they removed, but I would like to know and would like to fix whatever is missing.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#6
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #6
The only connection on the tranny is the reverse-sensing switch which obviously will light up the reverse tail lamps one activated. The switch that allows the car to start with the clutch engaged only is indeed the neutral-sensing switch located at the top of the clutch pedal. It acts as an off/on switch and once activated, it completes the starting the circuit and allows the car to turn over. The guy probably decied to hot wire the thing by taking the two wires for the switch and twisting them together - this will give you the same effect but minus having the depress the clutch pedal. Look for another sensing switch for down there or figure out what he has done to it
 
P

ponyboy762

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
32
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#7
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #7
Thanx for the info.
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Jun 2, 2004
#8
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #8
I jumpered my connector so I could start the car without the clutch. Why do you want to make it necessary to use the clutch to start the car?
 
P

ponyboy762

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
32
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#9
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #9
Seems right to figure out what is wrong with a car before you start biulding it up.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jun 2, 2004
#10
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #10
SlowGT said:
I jumpered my connector so I could start the car without the clutch. Why do you want to make it necessary to use the clutch to start the car?
Click to expand...


you're kidding right??? Some of the stuff people say on this site blows me away.

sorry man, flame me too if you must. by-passing the clutch safety switch is a bad safety issue. Anybody who drives your car is not going to be as anal as you about remembering there is not clutch neutral safety switch. What if it hits a small child directly in front of your car??
 
P

ponyboy762

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
32
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#11
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #11
didn't know if anything else could be affected. trust me, safety is not quite the issue.
 
P

ponyboy762

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
32
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#12
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #12
I guess what I should ask now, is will it cause any other problems other than the the fact that it starts without pushing the clutch in?
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Jun 2, 2004
#13
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #13
I'm not going to flame you. Everybody's entitled to have their say.

It's good to see that there are still folks out there that always obey the posted speed limit, use their turn signals as required and always come to a complete stop at every stop sign. And who would never, ever think of doing a burnout on the street.

Nobody else drives my car, so that's not an issue. Put a cage in your car and see just how handy it is every time you want to start the car or bump the motor in the garage.

Why do you think that switch was first installed? Because some idiot forgot that they had a manual transmission and probably did cause an accident when they started it in gear. 'OOPS, I forgot the transmission needs to be disengaged to start the car'. Then some other idiot decided that it was the auto manufacturer's responsibility and so they hired some lawyers to sue the automaker.

Very much like those that are filing against gunmakers and holding them accountable for what people are doing with their guns. So now we'll have fingerprint trigger locks. Very handy for home defense. 'Excuse me sir, could you please step back into the hallway while I try to undo this trigger lock in the dark?'

It all comes back to responsibility. Nobody wants to be responsible. It's always somebody else's fault. I'm very much from the old school in this area. I certainly don't mind accepting the responsibility for the things I do.

Sorry I got so far away from the original topic. If this is going to be discussed any further, maybe we should open another thread and see what others have to say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
Electrical Crank-no start ... no spark ... no injector pulse, was it something I did? (redux)
  • 85gtCOBRA
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
578
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 29, 2025
85gtCOBRA
8
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
401
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
R
94’ SN95 - Intermittent lope & bogging at moderate rpm
  • Red5.0ho
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
474
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 3, 2025
General karthief
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
380
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?