• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

TRICK FLOW HEAD INFO!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScortLX
  • Start date Start date Nov 4, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Nov 9, 2008
#81
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #81
He doesn't listen to dyno numbers.


this crap about rating it based on some joker's chasis dyno.
Click to expand...

dynos are opinions not SAE facts
Click to expand...


TGJ, keep us updated. Are you on the list for a set yet?
 

Green&GoldGT

Member
Aug 1, 2005
302
0
17
Virginia
Nov 9, 2008
#82
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #82
blackink00 said:
i dont think any street modular would ever see .600's lift
Click to expand...

The Crower's I have in my car have .581" lift on both sides. Logan Motorsports recommend .600" lift in most of their camshafts. They claim it helps with low end torque and upper end hp with better driveability than big duration camshafts.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Nov 10, 2008
#83
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #83
Winters98GT said:
TGJ, keep us updated. Are you on the list for a set yet?
Click to expand...

Yes, I am on the list to get a set...
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Nov 10, 2008
#84
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #84
02nightmaregt said:
ha yea it does Maybe they were just giving an estimate for what normal apps will be flowing?
Click to expand...

The TFS heads stock flow 240 CFM stock, that 257 CFM is a CNC ported set. That info I got confirming that was from Gregg @ TFS.
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Nov 10, 2008
#85
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #85
TGJ said:
Now my car originally made 294 RWHP, 320 RWTQ un-corrected on a Mustang Dyno in Orange, Texas with little run time on the engine. The SAE correction factor for that time in Orange was 1.027, manual calculating it with the weather data from the time the car was on the Dyno.
Click to expand...

TSS Heard nothing but praise when it comes to tuning the modulars
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Nov 10, 2008
#86
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #86
TGJ said:
Still crying about my engine, Bill?

Are you sure MD has said that about my car? Close friends of KenB have been known to call you an idiot/moron when you first started crying about my engine out performing your 5.4 3V...

Now my car originally made 294 RWHP, 320 RWTQ un-corrected on a Mustang Dyno in Orange, Texas with little run time on the engine. The SAE correction factor for that time in Orange was 1.027, manual calculating it with the weather data from the time the car was on the Dyno.

SAE Corrected on the Mustang Dyno, the car made 302 RWHP, 329 RWTQ.

It is a well known fact that a properly calibrated Mustang Dyno will show 8 - 12% less RWHP/RWTQ than the same corrected/uncorrected Dyno-Jet in Inertia mode will.

My Uncorrected numbers for a Dyno-Jet would be ranging from 318 - 330 RWHP and 346 - 358 RWTQ.

SAE Corrected, they would range from 326 - 338 RWHP and 355 - 368 RWTQ.

You were told that by very close friends of KenB's who know a thing or two way back when you first started crying about my car.

Are you are telling me that an engine that made between 326 - 338 RWHP with next to nothing for run time and a restrictive dual exhaust system can not achieve 10 - 22 RWHP with about 10,000 - 12,000 miles on it and a non-restrictive exhaust system? If you are, well... I will leave it at that.

It is well known that when my car had it's Big-Bore installed, the car ate an accessory belt on the drive down to Texas and that it started to eat the brand new one on the way home and I have had problems with accessory belts. It took almost 2 years to find that the Power Steering pump was the problem. That PS Pump may have played a factor in the original numbers as well.
Click to expand...


settle down. i dont care what you make. you will not compare to these heads no matter what SVO this or that you do. that was the point. and i could also care less that you make more power. with a good intake (which doesnt exist) i would murder your numbers.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Nov 10, 2008
#87
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #87
billfisher said:
settle down. i dont care what you make. you will not compare to these heads no matter what SVO this or that you do. that was the point. and i could also care less that you make more power. with a good intake (which doesnt exist) i would murder your numbers.
Click to expand...

You flat out questioned my cars current numbers saying that it wasn't possible and tried using KenB and Tim Barth to help you out. I addressed your concerns.

Who said I was not going to these new heads? I have not ruled that out and I am on the list to get these new heads...

As for you murdering my numbers, you said that over 2 years ago and you still are not even close...
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Nov 10, 2008
#88
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #88
d98gt said:
TSS Heard nothing but praise when it comes to tuning the modulars
Click to expand...

Dan and Craig know their stuff. I hope to be down there again in January, we will see what happens though.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Nov 10, 2008
#89
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #89
TGJ said:
Dan and Craig know their stuff. I hope to be down there again in January, we will see what happens though.
Click to expand...

does triangle tune LSX cars?
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Nov 11, 2008
#90
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #90
Winters98GT said:
does triangle tune LSX cars?
Click to expand...

I know they have tuned a few late model GM cars( Grand Prix GTPs ), but I don't know if they have ever tuned a LSx car. Your best would be to contact them.
 
S

Smokeurhonda

New Member
May 1, 2003
457
0
0
Maryland
Nov 12, 2008
#91
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #91
The other thing that guys have to realize, is that even with the newer stangs out, people still mod 2v's. Did you see the 5.0 market shut down when the mod motors came out? No. All this is going to do is not only offer us one more option, but also have other manufacturers look to us as a potential for profit when this head sells. So this will kick start other gusy to start kicking out heads for us. Remeber the days when nobody could find any manifold besides a Bullit? Now a year and change later we have 4 or 5 options.
 

theseeker411

New Member
Jun 10, 2007
14
0
0
Chattanooga, TN
Nov 12, 2008
#92
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #92
Very true. I had been tempted to get rid of my GT for a 2010, but now that we have more options for our motors (with more coming I'm sure), I think I'll hang on to it.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Nov 12, 2008
#93
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #93
2v GT's are going to rule mostly. i can see the suprise of a late model getting the crap beat out of him by a 2v n/a, and a stock headed termi getting whopped also by an eaton 2v.
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Nov 12, 2008
#94
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #94
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Flow Numbers for PI, SVO, TFS 185, Ported TFS 185, TFS R, and Ported TFS R Heads
  • Yel2002GTAuto
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
7K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 23, 2024
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
R
trick flow heads..what cams
  • rick87
  • Mar 26, 2011
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 30, 2011
rick87
R
5.4 3v dyno sim with big comp cams <6000rpms
  • billfisher
  • Jun 8, 2006
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
6K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 13, 2006
billfisher
Did some home porting on a set of GT-40p's
  • Visceral
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
6
Views
930
Regional Forums and Event Information Sep 17, 2004
Visceral
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?