• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Tuning and plenum mod. questions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2000GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 23, 2004
2

2000GT

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1999
222
0
16
Jan 23, 2004
#1
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #1
About two years ago I had my car dyno tuned for an a/f ratio of 13:1 at WOT with my current mods. If I add a new plenum/TB, who thinks I would need another tune and WHY?

It's my understanding that if I have a programmed a/f of 13:1 at WOT, wouldn’t my computer strive to achieve 13:1 after the bolt-on plenum/TB? Wouldn’t my oxygen sensors read the additional airflow from the larger plenum/TB and add more fuel to compensate until the a/f reached 13:1 again?

The result should be more horsepower and torque. However, the if for whatever reason the computer does not account for the additional airflow into the engine, my a/f ratio will run leaner than what it currently is right now. That concerns me.
 
H

Highroller

Founding Member
Oct 18, 2002
320
0
0
Vegas
Jan 23, 2004
#2
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #2
Wondering the same thing.. I would think that the computer would "want" to re-adjust for the additional air, but can the question is, Can it re-adjust, or will it keep the same program program settings?? I guess only someone that really understands tuning and ECU's can answer.
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Jan 23, 2004
#3
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #3
me wondering too
 
2

2000GT

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1999
222
0
16
Jan 23, 2004
#4
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #4
If someone knew what their a/f was before they installed the plenum/TB combo and then did a dyno afterwards that would help us as long as they posted their a/f graphs too. This way we could at least know if the car runs the same a/f after the install.

Maybe the guy that did the test on modulardepot.com could post the before and after a/f readings for us? Does anyone know who that was?
 

Tates

New Member
Jul 3, 2003
35
0
0
Northeast GA/Clemson, SC
Jan 23, 2004
#5
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #5
His name on here is 03trubluGT. I am in the process of buying one of these and will prolly retune afterwards, just don't know when this will be.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jan 24, 2004
#6
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #6
Yes there is a possibility that you would need a tune to keep it right at 13:1. During normal driving the EEC runs in a closed loop. It is constantly monitoring the oxygen sensor voltage and adjusting the on time of the fuel injectors to maintain a stoichiometric A/F ratio. During WOT it runs in open loop. To change the fuel ratio during WOT the EEC depends on functions in that the tuner probably changed to get your 13:1 ratio.
 

BMan5150

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
309
0
16
Columbus, OH
Jan 24, 2004
#7
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #7
jstreet0204 said:
Yes there is a possibility that you would need a tune to keep it right at 13:1. During normal driving the EEC runs in a closed loop. It is constantly monitoring the oxygen sensor voltage and adjusting the on time of the fuel injectors to maintain a stoichiometric A/F ratio. During WOT it runs in open loop. To change the fuel ratio during WOT the EEC depends on functions in that the tuner probably changed to get your 13:1 ratio.
Click to expand...

That makes sense to me! I forgot about WOT being at WOT. When you change something mechanical (plenum), the car is probably still grabbing the same values (fuel, timing, etc.) from the tables the car uses at WOT.

I think I'm understanding this now - thanks for your explanation. Just for good measure, are you saying that basically a tune is needed only for WOT? Is that all most tuners "tune" is the WOT tables?
 

KenB

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,416
0
36
West Palm Beach
Jan 24, 2004
#8
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #8
jstreet0204 said:
Yes there is a possibility that you would need a tune to keep it right at 13:1. During normal driving the EEC runs in a closed loop. It is constantly monitoring the oxygen sensor voltage and adjusting the on time of the fuel injectors to maintain a stoichiometric A/F ratio. During WOT it runs in open loop. To change the fuel ratio during WOT the EEC depends on functions in that the tuner probably changed to get your 13:1 ratio.
Click to expand...

Yes and no. Depends on the tuner. If the car was tuned correctly you won't need a retune. While at WOT the MAF will detect more air so the EEC will add more fuel to maintain the correct A/F ratio. Like I said, it depends on the tune.

If you have an SCT or Fordchip tune, then you will be fine.
 
2

2000GT

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1999
222
0
16
Jan 24, 2004
#9
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #9
BMan5150 said:
That makes sense to me! I forgot about WOT being at WOT. When you change something mechanical (plenum), the car is probably still grabbing the same values (fuel, timing, etc.) from the tables the car uses at WOT.

I think I'm understanding this now - thanks for your explanation. Just for good measure, are you saying that basically a tune is needed only for WOT? Is that all most tuners "tune" is the WOT tables?
Click to expand...

From my experience, you only tune the a/f ratio at WOT. The part throttle a/f ratio doesn't get tinkered with. However, I believe my car's timing was tinkered with for both part throttle and WOT. I remember the tuner pulled out all timing retard after 3500 rpms. He refered to it as "throttle tip-in retard". He told me the stock program has timing retard built in between tranny shifts on both the manual and auto tranny. Seems like something Ford would do to lessen the blow of WOT throttle abuse on the tranny.
 

KenB

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,416
0
36
West Palm Beach
Jan 24, 2004
#10
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #10
2000GT said:
From my experience, you only tune the a/f ratio at WOT. The part throttle a/f ratio doesn't get tinkered with. However, I believe my car's timing was tinkered with for both part throttle and WOT. I remember the tuner pulled out all timing retard after 3500 rpms. He refered to it as "throttle tip-in retard". He told me the stock program has timing retard built in between tranny shifts on both the manual and auto tranny. Seems like something Ford would do to lessen the blow of WOT throttle abuse on the tranny.
Click to expand...


Doesn't exist on the manual cars.
 

BMan5150

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
309
0
16
Columbus, OH
Jan 24, 2004
#11
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #11
KenB said:
Doesn't exist on the manual cars.
Click to expand...

Timing lulls between upshifts? Are you sure? I've heard many people talk about this, and I can honestly say there is something scaling back the throttle a bit inbetween shifts - in particular the 1-2 shift. 2000GT's car exhibits none of this slight hesitation on upshifts with his manual tranny. Could there be another explaination as to why the car hesitates momentarily on upshifts?
 
P

PEA

New Member
Jan 22, 2004
22
0
0
Jan 24, 2004
#12
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #12
read this might help some people

2000GT said:
About two years ago I had my car dyno tuned for an a/f ratio of 13:1 at WOT with my current mods. If I add a new plenum/TB, who thinks I would need another tune and WHY?

It's my understanding that if I have a programmed a/f of 13:1 at WOT, wouldn’t my computer strive to achieve 13:1 after the bolt-on plenum/TB? Wouldn’t my oxygen sensors read the additional airflow from the larger plenum/TB and add more fuel to compensate until the a/f reached 13:1 again?

The result should be more horsepower and torque. However, the if for whatever reason the computer does not account for the additional airflow into the engine, my a/f ratio will run leaner than what it currently is right now. That concerns me.
Click to expand...

please dont waste your money,
most bolt on crap only makes 2 to 8 real hp
from my own trials
all you do is spend money,chips r good for more timing and raised rev limiter,to help you use the power your car makes,the chip ppl say to reflash for all new bolt ons-
they do that to make money,in the real world his extra tune might get 1 more hp from all your bolt ons
i wasted time and money figuring this out,and you guys will too
please save money and get real hp...vortech,
you want to feel like a little kid again,you will
i dynoed at 370hp and love it.
again bolt ons r not worth the money,add it up and you can almost get your supercharger lol
hope this helps
p.s. dont brag that you have bolt ons-
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
Intentional Vacuum leak to resolve rich idle?
  • FastDriver
  • Jul 13, 2023
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
9
Views
2K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 13, 2023
Noobz347
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
780
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
M
2002 Gt Fuel cell mod question
  • MPN737
  • Aug 11, 2020
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 15, 2020
MPN737
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?