tweecer peeps..breakpoint input question

blksn955.o

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2002

3,263

0

66

st.louis mo 314

Oct 9, 2005

#1

• Oct 9, 2005

• #1

I posted on the tweecer forums but they have been realy slow lately with who is on and who isnt (mostly the isnt part),

I cannot get my T4M0 breakpoint to enter into the j4j1 program, or vise versa. I get some .00013xx number. I forgot how your supposed to enter it to get it to read correct.

thanks.

posted this in talk also, didnt notice I was in talk until I came back..if a mod could remove that post it would be great...thanks again.

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Oct 9, 2005

#2

• Oct 9, 2005

• #2

Greg

Mine is entered as 1.9878e-5

The e-5 means the d point is 5 places to the left or .000019878

CalEdit is looking for the e-5 method of notation however.

Grady

 

blksn955.o

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2002

3,263

0

66

st.louis mo 314

Oct 9, 2005

#3

• Oct 9, 2005

• #3

Thats how I am entering it???

counting 6 spaces for the dec. forward. the breakpoint on the stock T4M0 is 9.98378E-6. I enter 00000998378, and have tried .00000998378 when I switch to tables and go back it is like .00013xxx? Do I have to move it E-5 for the j4j1 or is there something else wrong?

Thanks Grady

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Oct 9, 2005

#4

• Oct 9, 2005

• #4

blksn955.o said:

Thats how I am entering it???

counting 6 spaces for the dec. forward. the breakpoint on the stock T4M0 is 9.98378E-6. I enter 00000998378, and have tried .00000998378 when I switch to tables and go back it is like .00013xxx? Do I have to move it E-5 for the j4j1 or is there something else wrong?

Thanks Grady

Click to expand...

I looked at a couple of t4m0 files and the value I saw was 1.0014e-5.

The value you show of .00000998378 would be .998378e-5.

Try the value of .9984e-5 and see if CalEdit takes it.

Grady

 

blksn955.o

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2002

3,263

0

66

st.louis mo 314

Oct 9, 2005

#5

• Oct 9, 2005

• #5

hmmm that is wierd???

my t4m0 file has 9.98378E-6

my j4j1 has the 1.00136E-5

if the eec is "rounding" to its nearest value then the 1 makes sense and would be logical.

maybe its a variance of some kind in my t4m0 bin file.

Thanks again for the help

 

blksn955.o

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2002

3,263

0

66

st.louis mo 314

Oct 9, 2005

#6

• Oct 9, 2005

• #6

entered it in as .00000998378 in the j4j1 (e5), it came back as 9.98378E-6

 

Zero Signal

Active Member

Feb 24, 2003

2,633

2

46

Tucson, AZ

Oct 9, 2005

#7

• Oct 9, 2005

• #7

It's e-5 moving the decimal like that is a huge change. You'll never get it outside e-5 you will usually use between 1 and 3e-5

 

blksn955.o

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2002

3,263

0

66

st.louis mo 314

Oct 9, 2005

#8

• Oct 9, 2005

• #8

it did the e6 on its own.

The only way I can get it to read e-5 is if I do it .0000998378 and that is not close to the value of E6. then it reads 9.98378e-5 when the stock value is 9.98378e-6 (in the t4m0 factory tune)

9.98378e-6 is = to .998378e-5

Grady- is that 1.0014e-5 what your bin is showing stock? Might try that breakpoint. The only thing is my stock j4j1 breakpoint is 1.00136 and that tune has the poor perf. issues.

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Oct 9, 2005

#9

• Oct 9, 2005

• #9

blksn955.o said:

Grady- is that 1.0014e-5 what your bin is showing stock? Might try that breakpoint. The only thing is my stock j4j1 breakpoint is 1.00136 and that tune has the poor perf. issues.

Click to expand...

I looked at t4m0, j4j1, & u4p0 ... they all had the value of 1.0014e-5

Grady

 

blksn955.o

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2002

3,263

0

66

st.louis mo 314

Oct 9, 2005

#10

• Oct 9, 2005

• #10

do you think I have a bad set of bin files or do you think the diff. is in the 1.20 v 1.3 version I use?

They are deff. diff. on my computer.

I will input the 1.0014 and see what it does, load one tune up and datalog and load the other and datalog.

 

bjl95mustang

Founding Member

Jan 18, 2000

1,495

0

36

Austin,TX

Oct 10, 2005

#11

• Oct 10, 2005

• #11

Is your software set to cbaza? if it's set to another one it will act wiered.

 

Zero Signal

Active Member

Feb 24, 2003

2,633

2

46

Tucson, AZ

Oct 10, 2005

#12

• Oct 10, 2005

• #12

Yeah mine was 1.0014e-5 ish stock. By the way, how is your combo working out so far despite not having the tune finished? Just wondering sinde it's close to what I'm doing.

 

blksn955.o

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2002

3,263

0

66

st.louis mo 314

Oct 10, 2005

#13

• Oct 10, 2005

• #13

bjl95mustang said:

Is your software set to cbaza? if it's set to another one it will act wiered.

Click to expand...

yes set to cbaza.

 

blksn955.o

Founding Member

Mar 15, 2002

3,263

0

66

st.louis mo 314

Oct 10, 2005

#14

• Oct 10, 2005

• #14

Zero Signal said:

Yeah mine was 1.0014e-5 ish stock. By the way, how is your combo working out so far despite not having the tune finished? Just wondering sinde it's close to what I'm doing.

Click to expand...

I am still sorting out issues, need to redo my valve train as I need the correct pushrods (still on the stockers) and they are way to long. I am sure that is hurting me, how much I dont know. Drivability has been great so far with the tweecer just the perfrom totaly sucks, runs like it did with the stock long block.

I think I am going to input the 1.0014e-5 and see, if everyone else has that fig. in all the tunes.

I also think I am going to download a new stock j4j1 and t4m0 bin file, might have a bad bin base file.