• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

VAM problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rayzr
  • Start date Start date Jul 8, 2011
R

Rayzr

New Member
Mar 25, 2009
17
0
0
Jul 8, 2011
#1
  • Jul 8, 2011
  • #1
Hello fellow stangnet members, i've had my 89 2.3 turbo hatch for a year and a half. I have done some mods to it. Ported head and manifolds, I then decided to do the blow through vam mod 2 days ago. I took the cover off the vam, and my first mistake was not to mark the vam spring where its at stock. I then unscrewed the tiny screw too much and the whole spring unwound. My Question is.. Is there a picture or some kind of reference of some kind where I can place the spring back to its stock location? Your replies are much appreciated
 
K

KhanTyranitar

Member
Apr 21, 2011
93
1
9
Jul 10, 2011
#2
  • Jul 10, 2011
  • #2
Unfortunately I cannot be of much help there, but I would recommend either doing a MAF conversion or switching to speed density. The VAM is a restriction on the intake, it makes your turbo work harder to get air. Even doing the blow through, it is restrictive, and moving away from it is a better option in the long run if you are trying to get more power. The MAF conversion requires over riding the stock programming, which you have to do for a blow through VAM if you want reliable results anyway. A MAF produces far less resistance to flow than a VAM. the 90mm lighting MAF is a good choice, then you need the connector to plug in. You should be able to find instructions on the conversion. Then you can run a Jaybird or Quarterhorse on your stock ECU to allow it to interpret the new signal correctly.

The speed density doesn't use the VAM or a MAF, but rather uses a MAP sensor to measure vacuum or boost, and combined with RPM, intake temperature, throttle position, and known constants (injectors size, displacement, and a custom made fuel and timing map), allows the computer to calculate how much air the engine is flowing, and therefore how much fuel the engine needs. No restrictions, and overall, for performance purposes, is better than a VAM or MAF.

Unfortunately, I don't know about the spring position.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
571
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
S
Ignition Coil SPRING COMPRESS TO TOP OF PLUG???
  • Scwhitten
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
515
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 9, 2025
Scwhitten
S
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
576
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
163
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
496
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?