• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

vortech vs 347--lets talk

  • Thread starter Thread starter bimmertech
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 14, 2006
#21
  • Sep 14, 2006
  • #21
Kenne Bell's are harder on engines than centrifugal superchargers.

If you have the blower, stick with it...and the reason?

If you build the n/a combo (stock block)...and want to put the supercharger on...that will be a no go.

You will make more power with the supercharger (h/c/i)...and drive around more reliably (good tune)...

Or you can go the n/a 347 route, peak it out, and then have to redo everything again so you can get a stronger block...

You can rebuild the heads on the supercharger.

450rwhp is quite hard to come by and be streetable with a 347. I wouldn't want to worry every time I punched it "will something break?".

Also, don't let word manipulation get you...some like to do it like car salesman on here. Example, one might say he does "this"...but has probably done it a couple times...but doesn't relay that crucial information. I have overrevved my car a few times...but I don't tell people I "rev my car to XXXX rpm"...
 

Sleepy McNastee

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
491
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Sep 14, 2006
#22
  • Sep 14, 2006
  • #22
I say go with the supercharger. Then save for a Dart block if you want to go 347. My 2 cents.
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Sep 14, 2006
#23
  • Sep 14, 2006
  • #23
Lots of good advice..
My advice... Build a 347 dart block or build a 351/408 dart block.

Put the S/C on til it is done if you want. A stroker will give you more torque and more fun. S/C will give you more top end (speed) between 3500rpm and 6000rpm. but for that reason is not as usable on the street,(my opnion) while a stroker is definately a street machine.

I have a 347 and a Vortech SQ. I did a H/C/I then a year later Pauls built a short block stroker and a year or so later I put the S/C on it. If I had it all to do again a stroker based on a 351 would be my motor. Don't get me wrong I like my supercharger but only usable at high rpm.

Hope this makes sense to you!!
 
9

93GTWannabe

Member
May 11, 2006
81
0
7
Norfolk/Houston
Sep 15, 2006
#24
  • Sep 15, 2006
  • #24
I'm in the process of building a 331, with 9:5.1 Compression so i can run some giggle gas. I love the sound of a Centrifigul supercharger, but damn, a N/A car putting out big numbers is down right sexy. I'm only aiming for 300, but i'm hoping for something more along the lines of 400 on gas.
 

Dagz

New Member
Dec 2, 2005
173
0
0
Quesnel Canada
Sep 15, 2006
#25
  • Sep 15, 2006
  • #25
Blown, then stroked, why not you got it so use it then build the block, it would be rude not too!!
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
Sep 15, 2006
#26
  • Sep 15, 2006
  • #26
id do the blower. i like the whistling noises... that is all
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Sep 16, 2006
#27
  • Sep 16, 2006
  • #27
the decision will also heavily depend on your budget. a dart block based motor can easily run you around $10,000 by the time all the machining, assembly, and h/c/i etc are purchased. my personal opinion would be to slap the blower on and enjoy it for now since your stock bottom end is healthy. during that time, you can begin your stroker build. i will say, after driving vib's 10.0:1 347 i was really impressed by all of the torque down low. a centrifugal supercharger will be the opposite of that. you will make the most power up top as the boost climbs. again, it really all boils down to personal preference. in your situation, there is no wrong decision.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?