Kenne Bell's are harder on engines than centrifugal superchargers.
If you have the blower, stick with it...and the reason?
If you build the n/a combo (stock block)...and want to put the supercharger on...that will be a no go.
You will make more power with the supercharger (h/c/i)...and drive around more reliably (good tune)...
Or you can go the n/a 347 route, peak it out, and then have to redo everything again so you can get a stronger block...
You can rebuild the heads on the supercharger.
450rwhp is quite hard to come by and be streetable with a 347. I wouldn't want to worry every time I punched it "will something break?".
Also, don't let word manipulation get you...some like to do it like car salesman on here. Example, one might say he does "this"...but has probably done it a couple times...but doesn't relay that crucial information. I have overrevved my car a few times...but I don't tell people I "rev my car to XXXX rpm"...
If you have the blower, stick with it...and the reason?
If you build the n/a combo (stock block)...and want to put the supercharger on...that will be a no go.
You will make more power with the supercharger (h/c/i)...and drive around more reliably (good tune)...
Or you can go the n/a 347 route, peak it out, and then have to redo everything again so you can get a stronger block...
You can rebuild the heads on the supercharger.
450rwhp is quite hard to come by and be streetable with a 347. I wouldn't want to worry every time I punched it "will something break?".
Also, don't let word manipulation get you...some like to do it like car salesman on here. Example, one might say he does "this"...but has probably done it a couple times...but doesn't relay that crucial information. I have overrevved my car a few times...but I don't tell people I "rev my car to XXXX rpm"...
and a year or so later I put the S/C on it. If I had it all to do again a stroker based on a 351 would be my motor. Don't get me wrong I like my supercharger but only usable at high rpm.