• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Went to the strip today...Good & Bad news

  • Thread starter Thread starter coolblue65
  • Start date Start date Sep 7, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Sep 7, 2009
#1
  • Sep 7, 2009
  • #1
First the Good news, I was finally able to get my drag radials (235 BFG's) on and get to the track, and I really improved my times, although I still have a lot to gain in my 60'.

1st Run
(20 PSI in tires)
R/T ... .200
60' ... 2.034
330 ... 5.438
1/8 ... 8.263
MPH ... 88.83
1000 ... 10.694
1/4 ... 12.757
MPH ... 109.60

2nd Run
(18 PSI)
R/T ... .273
60' ... 2.021
330 ... 5.404
1/8 ... 8.240
MPH ... 88.39
1000 ... 10.667
1/4 ... 12.746
MPH ... 108.86

So the bad 3rd run, I never left the line because my custom made 3.5" drive shaft decided to let go:



It looks like it was just welded poorly, thoughts?

Funny thing is I'm not to mad about it breaking because I have finally started to get some respectable times.
 

chris66dad

Member
Dec 19, 2008
167
0
17
Benicia California
Sep 7, 2009
#2
  • Sep 7, 2009
  • #2
Good times on the runs!
The welds look like they did not have good penetration.
My aluminum shaft has welds that are twice as wide as the one in the pictures. It is made by Coleman and sold through Street or Track in any length you need for $299.
Here are pics of it on my webpage: Drive shaft.

Good Luck and Be Safe
Ron
 

EP429

Member
Jun 30, 2007
125
5
18
Central Texas
Sep 7, 2009
#3
  • Sep 7, 2009
  • #3
How much weld was actually on the joint? Looks like most of it was on the shaft instead of where the two meet
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Sep 8, 2009
#4
  • Sep 8, 2009
  • #4
The times are good. That sucks about the failure. Whose driveshaft is it?
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Sep 8, 2009
#5
  • Sep 8, 2009
  • #5
tx65coupe said:
The times are good. That sucks about the failure. Whose driveshaft is it?
Click to expand...

I had the driveshaft made by a local driveline shop. Its been awhile since I bought it, and there is no warranty that I remember, but I am going to take it into the shop this week and show it to them and see what there response is, as it appears that the failure was 100% a result of their workmanship.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Sep 8, 2009
#6
  • Sep 8, 2009
  • #6
AC welding is pretty weak. But there isn't enough fillet on the yoke side. Have welded AL drive shafts before and 2 of them have twisted under a load, but never broke the weld.
 
6

66forfun

Member
Feb 25, 2006
260
0
16
Pittsburgh
Sep 8, 2009
#7
  • Sep 8, 2009
  • #7
My driveshaft guy told me to stay away from the aluminum shafts and go for 3.5" moly. I trusted him and ditched the areostar shaft cut to the right size idea. No problems since.
 

hungrymonkey

White by Birth, Trash By Choice
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,077
12
108
Oregon.
Sep 8, 2009
#8
  • Sep 8, 2009
  • #8
Nice times.


I did just realize that I have been spending to much time in the off topic sections. Because it took me a minute to realize what type of strip you were talking about when I saw the title...
 

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Sep 9, 2009
#9
  • Sep 9, 2009
  • #9
Nice times. Judging by your 109 trap speed you have low 12 sec capability. Just need more practice on the BFG's. When you starting hitting 1.8x's or so 60 times those ET's will be a droppin. I can't recall what Trans you run. Stick or Auto? Again nice times, sorry to see the carniage.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Sep 9, 2009
#10
  • Sep 9, 2009
  • #10
coolblue65 said:
First the Good news, I was finally able to get my drag radials (235 BFG's) on and get to the track, and I really improved my times, although I still have a lot to gain in my 60'.

1st Run
(20 PSI in tires)
R/T ... .200
60' ... 2.034
330 ... 5.438
1/8 ... 8.263
MPH ... 88.83
1000 ... 10.694
1/4 ... 12.757
MPH ... 109.60

2nd Run
(18 PSI)
R/T ... .273
60' ... 2.021
330 ... 5.404
1/8 ... 8.240
MPH ... 88.39
1000 ... 10.667
1/4 ... 12.746
MPH ... 108.86
Click to expand...

these are good numbers, and quite consistent. i would like to see your 60ft times closer to a high 1.8 range though, but i think you will get there in time.

So the bad 3rd run, I never left the line because my custom made 3.5" drive shaft decided to let go:



It looks like it was just welded poorly, thoughts?

Funny thing is I'm not to mad about it breaking because I have finally started to get some respectable times.
Click to expand...

the weld looks like a cold weld with very little penetration.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Sep 9, 2009
#11
  • Sep 9, 2009
  • #11
Thanks for the positive comments, I have been waiting for a long time to start getting some decent times on this car (considering all the money spent!) its also a nice pride booster that I can smoke my old man's C5 Vette!

I would like to see myself in the 1.8's too, I was really hoping to get into the 1.9x's on Monday. Out of curiosity how does a .1 second improvement in '60 translate to the 1/4 ET?


ga289stocker- I run a Tremec 3550, it has the lower 3.27 first gear ratio instead of the 2.98, and I have 3.55 rear gears.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Sep 9, 2009
#12
  • Sep 9, 2009
  • #12
Maybe 2 tenths, maybe more. That MPH is a good sign. That's good for low 12's definitely, 11's if you drive like you stole it. Would imagine low 1.7, even 1.6's might be possible with good traction
Weird you broke with those 60's though. Second time I have seen an AL DS go with 60's in the 2.0's. hmmm
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Sep 9, 2009
#13
  • Sep 9, 2009
  • #13
10secgoal said:
Maybe 2 tenths, maybe more. That MPH is a good sign. That's good for low 12's definitely, 11's if you drive like you stole it. Would imagine low 1.7, even 1.6's might be possible with good traction
Weird you broke with those 60's though. Second time I have seen an AL DS go with 60's in the 2.0's. hmmm
Click to expand...

Agree, should run 1.7's with no issues with those times. 1.8's or slower are, well slow for those et's/mph.
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
Sep 11, 2009
#14
  • Sep 11, 2009
  • #14
Way to dip into the 12's! It's always a plus when you beat your previous best.

2.0 second 60's are way slow for a 12.7 et. Sounds like you need to launch much harder. Well, when you get a driveshaft that will hold up.

That sux about the driveshaft. Nothing should ever break with over 2 second 60 footers. Bad weld! Bad!
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Sep 11, 2009
#15
  • Sep 11, 2009
  • #15
now i am just debating if i should put my steal driveshaft back in with new u-joints and run it for awhile, or if I should spend $400 and get a new drive shaft right away.

Vinyl66- It was only my first time on the drag radials and I really wasn't sure how to launch it. My last clean run I had the tires at 18psi, i did a fairly short burn out, and was holding ~3000 RPMs at the line, after the light goes green I didn't get 100% into the throttle until I was already rolling for a bit (I think that is a habbit I got into because of my street tires and them breaking loose at low speeds with full throttle). Long story short, I have a lot to practice.
 
J

js66coupe

Member
May 10, 2009
49
0
7
Florida
Sep 11, 2009
#16
  • Sep 11, 2009
  • #16
If you're going to the drag strip, get a suitable driveshaft. If you're just going to cruise around town for a while, a stock driveshaft should be fine. For drag racing, esp. when using sticky tires, I like to use a well made steel driveshaft with a safety loop. Denny's driveshafts is one of several places that makes a good quality piece--for the reason listed below, from their website.

"We stand behind all of our Heavy Duty driveshafts....so remember "IF YOU EVER TWIST OUR TUBING OR BREAK OUR WELDS...WE'LL REPLACE IT FREE!!!"
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Sep 13, 2009
#17
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #17
So was that a shortened aerostar driveshaft? Looks too clean to be a used piece?

If it was an aerostar shaft, it's nice to see that even in the 12's, it was the weld that let go instead of a twisted tube.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Sep 13, 2009
#18
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #18
ForceFed70 said:
So was that a shortened aerostar driveshaft? Looks too clean to be a used piece?

If it was an aerostar shaft, it's nice to see that even in the 12's, it was the weld that let go instead of a twisted tube.
Click to expand...

No its a custom made 3.5" one from a local driveline shop, ran me about $400.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Sep 13, 2009
#19
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #19
A steel shaft will be better for the stick on launches. May help you get off the line harder.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Sep 13, 2009
#20
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #20
ever had the car on a dyno?

88mph through the 1/8 seems a little low for that setup . . .
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

How Did I Do At The Track ?
  • TwoToneHatch
  • Mar 23, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
834
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2011
KHibbs
Went to the track today...
  • 79'293stang
  • May 28, 2010
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 10, 2010
79'293stang
Track Results - Finally went 10's - Video
  • ChromdOutDubs
  • May 2, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2009
89-347-LX
Finally went drag racing with the new supercharger...
  • Five Oh Brian
  • Sep 20, 2008
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
3K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 24, 2008
Five Oh Brian
G
New 1/4 mile times with new short block!
  • green_fow_six
  • May 3, 2007
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
964
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2007
Stan Weiss
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?