• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

what are the differences and benefits between mechanical and hydraulic cams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bad68coupe
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2006

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Oct 15, 2006
#1
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #1
what are the differences and benefits between mechanical and hydraulic cams?
 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Oct 15, 2006
#2
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #2
That's a pretty big question

Here is an over simplified answer:

Difference:
Solid lifter is just that. Lifter is solid and has no compliance. Hydraulic lifter uses a hollow cylinder housing with a piston and spring. Engine oil fills the cylinder under the piston. There is compliance with a hydraulic lifter.

Benefits to solid lifter cam:
more agressive profiles to allow better breathing
higher rpm limits without worry of lifter pump or sink

Benefits to Hydraulic cam:
Quiet operation
more tolerant to ignorance

You will hear people say that you have to constantly adjust solid lifters. (IMO) they've got their heads up their ass, or they are parroting the wrong people. I've gone over 60K miles without even looking at adjustment on solid lifter cams. There are only two reasons to re-adjust solid lifters. Valve recession and valve-train wear. Both of these have more to do with picking the wrong stuff, or poor assembly techniques, than the fact it's a solid lifter.

FWIW; I rarely suggest a solid lifter for a non-racing application, unless the person really knows what (s)he is doing, and has optimized the entire engine/drivtrain package. Hydraulic cams and valve-train are too good now to really see the benefit for anything less than racing.
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Oct 15, 2006
#3
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #3
awesome, thank you.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 16, 2006
#4
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #4
to add to what 66runt said, solid lifter cams have longer opening and closing ramps to allow for the valve lash to be taken up softly to prevent hammering the valvetrain. hydraulic lifters dont need said ramps because the leak down feature built into the lifters does the same thing.
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Oct 16, 2006
#5
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #5
66Runt said:
You will hear people say that you have to constantly adjust solid lifters. (IMO) they've got their heads up their ass, or they are parroting the wrong people. I've gone over 60K miles without even looking at adjustment on solid lifter cams. There are only two reasons to re-adjust solid lifters. Valve recession and valve-train wear. Both of these have more to do with picking the wrong stuff, or poor assembly techniques, than the fact it's a solid lifter.
Click to expand...

My theory is that this urban legend came from the factory use of adjustment nuts with no polylocks. The nuts would back off a bit and you'd need to tighten them up. If the rockers stay put, you're right, only valve recession or cam/lifter wear would cause the clearances to grow.
 
B

brin0357

New Member
Jan 26, 2006
169
0
0
Oct 16, 2006
#6
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #6
The factory adjustables arent that great. The threads get loose and what not and they will not hold adjustment too well. One question, how can you tell a mechanical cam vs a hydraulic cam. Can you look at it and tell? Is it in the hardness or angle of the lobes?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 17, 2006
#7
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #7
brin0357 said:
One question, how can you tell a mechanical cam vs a hydraulic cam. Can you look at it and tell? Is it in the hardness or angle of the lobes?
Click to expand...

you cant tell by looking. you have to have the timing card that comes with the cam. one thing, you can put hydraulic lifters on a solid lifter cam, but NOT the other way around. if you do put hydraulic lifters on a soid lifter cam though, you will have much more duration and valve overlap to contend with, and it usually hurts low end performance.
 
B

brin0357

New Member
Jan 26, 2006
169
0
0
Oct 17, 2006
#8
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #8
Interesting, we have cams laying all over our shop and sometimes I will measure them too see how much lift they have got. Some of them are pretty big, but I wonder if they are a solid or hydrauliuc cam. Why would you have more duration?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 17, 2006
#9
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #9
brin0357 said:
Interesting, we have cams laying all over our shop and sometimes I will measure them too see how much lift they have got. Some of them are pretty big, but I wonder if they are a solid or hydrauliuc cam. Why would you have more duration?
Click to expand...

the added duration comes from the longer opening and closing ramps built into the solid lifter cam to prevent hammering the valvetrain. as long as you use solid lifters on a solid lifter cam, you get the advertised duration, but if you use hydraulic lifters on a solid lifter cam you get about 20 degrees more duration or so depending on the grind because the hydraulic lifters already have a cushioning effect built in, so the ramps add duration with hydraulic lifters.
 
M

MitchGT

Member
Apr 1, 2005
204
0
17
Oct 18, 2006
#10
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #10
I think you end up with less duration putting a hydraulic lifter on a solid cam. it would absorb a little on the opening event, and maybe even a little lift.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Oct 18, 2006
#11
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #11
The added duration of a hydraulic lifter over a solid is also due to decreased lash clearances. Solid lifters typically require .012"-.030" of lash. A hydraulic lifter uses a preload which equates to zero lash.

Typically a solid will appear to loose somewhere around 6 degrees over its rated duration.

At least that is the way it was explained to me. . . . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
85
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Fuel pressure regulator differences
  • dan50
  • Mar 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
66
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 26, 2026
dan50
E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
124
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?