• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What are the shortcomings of a stock intake.

  • Thread starter Thread starter tim_the_toolman
  • Start date Start date Jul 16, 2004
T

tim_the_toolman

Founding Member
Nov 30, 2001
1,317
0
36
Nashville TN
Jul 16, 2004
#1
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #1
And how much horsepower could a stock 87+ intake support?
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Jul 16, 2004
#2
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #2
not too sure but to give u an answer i dont think over 350
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jul 16, 2004
#3
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #3
the lower intake is what is really restrictive....im not sure how much it could support though. probably not too much without a port job on it
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jul 16, 2004
#4
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #4
What are the shortcomings of a stock intake? Not too many for a mild motor once you get Tmoss to port it for you! :
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Jul 16, 2004
#5
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #5
if u can find like a cheap gt40 explorerr intake that would help out alot more then the stock, i think cobra intake can hold up to like 300 not exactly sure
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 17, 2004
#6
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #6
An unported "select" stock intake supports ~230-240HP if you get a good engine combo together. Port the lower and I've seen the stock intake support ~260HP. Get crazy with cutting the upper up to port it, and you might get ~300HP out of it if your good. All these are naturally aspirated numbers and just my opinion.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jul 17, 2004
#7
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #7
All i know that is with the stock intake and mild porting, I couldn't muster up anything better than a 13.5 at the track with my afr's and afm cam. My new Holely intake will change all that, however.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 17, 2004
#8
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #8
50mustang001 said:
All i know that is with the stock intake and mild porting, I couldn't muster up anything better than a 13.5 at the track with my afr's and afm cam. My new Holely intake will change all that, however.
Click to expand...

That is quite the mismatch. KNow what your weight was? And what was your mph?
 
T

tim_the_toolman

Founding Member
Nov 30, 2001
1,317
0
36
Nashville TN
Jul 22, 2004
#9
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #9
well heres the reason i ask. I have spent an enormous amount of time hiding my wires and smoothing the engine bay and it looks killer. the car is currently speed density, but i do have a A9L mass air setup for it. But it looks soooooo clean with just a small billet air filter attached right to the throttle body. I also have several stock intakes i was thinking of show polishing, but before i did i wanted to know if it would be a waste of time. Sounds like it is. I just sold my Track Heat, now i am trying to figure out what to get. That and how far I can take this speed density motor using nitrous.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jul 22, 2004
#10
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #10
I don't think horsepower is the issue with the stock intake. The runners are longer and help to produce more torque and a wider powerband that ends earlier than a short runner intake. For a street car most people including myself absolutely underestimate what a stock intake will do. If you port the lower they work surprisingly well on mild cars. Even after porting the smaller ports help with intake charge velocity and really produce excellent low and midrange power. Tmoss should know, he's ported something like a million of those things and people still send them.
 
0

00 Red SS

New Member
Jan 22, 2003
270
1
0
Grain Valley, MO
Jul 22, 2004
#11
  • Jul 22, 2004
  • #11
I know a few almost stock aod cars running high 12's on nitrous, i mean only dr's, mufflers and gears pretty impressive since they will go deep 12's with some more parts.
 
T

tim_the_toolman

Founding Member
Nov 30, 2001
1,317
0
36
Nashville TN
Jul 23, 2004
#12
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #12
Right on...I am just trying to hit 7's in the 1/8 th on motor. Do you think that's possible.
 
S

Schlodes

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
354
0
0
Lidsville.... West side dawg..
Jul 23, 2004
#13
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #13
tim_the_toolman said:
Right on...I am just trying to hit 7's in the 1/8 th on motor. Do you think that's possible.
Click to expand...

Sure, why not? If I had an 1986 SD car with flattop pistons, I would go with a nice set of ported Thumper E7s, a Tmoss lower and stock upper intake or if $$ allows, an aftermarket... like an Edelbrock Performer or similar [something idle - 6000] 65mm T body... all of which would probably come close to maxing out the stock 19 lb injectors... plus all the bolt on stuff .. headers.. exhaust..etc... then, a GOOD posi unit, some 3.73s or 4.10s [28" tire on the 4.10s IMO], 26x10" ET Drags. 255 L/hr fuel pump, and a good quality wet nitrous kit with a window switch. Little bit of suspension work to make it all stick off the line and you'll be in the 7s in the 1/8th mile..

Depending on the amount of nitrous used... it could have the potential to go upper 11s easily... maybe quicker if you're brave and run the 150 shot..
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Jul 23, 2004
#14
  • Jul 23, 2004
  • #14
I had to run a 150 shot on my stock 86' motor to get a 7.90.
I had a gt-40,65mm T-body and full BBK exhaust w/Flowmasters.
I think it was because of the crap 86' heads and cam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
862
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
380
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Engine Vacuum reserve capacity question
  • Mcmahst
  • Apr 24, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
467
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2025
Mcmahst
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
795
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?