• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

What block is the 4.6L built from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackenedSVT
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Apr 5, 2004
#21
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #21
the 305 and 307 were smog era chevy engines thet never made decent power. The 302 chevy was an awesome solid lifter RPM machine that dominated trans am racing!
 
G

gnixl

Founding Member
Dec 30, 1998
120
0
0
Apr 5, 2004
#22
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #22
new22003 said:
there was a 427 sohc but it was still a 2 valve but it made great horsepower and was the only threat to the chrysler hemi on the nascar tracks.
Click to expand...
But it had timing chains longer than the Chunnel and probably wouldn't have been around for the end (even if NASCAR allowed). The tunnel port was the ultimate (outlawed) FE. Ford mistakenly thought the SOHC design could sustain 8K RPM on the long tracks.
Remember the less aero Talledega was only a couple of MPH down from the winged wonders with Hemis (D.Pearson did race laps at 199, B. Baker's lone "record" is around 202 if I remember correctly).
'60's Hemis are overrated - didn't make significantly more horses than the 50's tech FE (at sustained 7K RPM).
The Hemi is basically a no squish band, detonation prone, big two-valve motor with it's attendant characteristics. The FE was just fine to handle Chrysler's Hemi, but be glad Rat motors were outlawed by GM mgmt.
Everyone had "experimental" crap during the '60's (witness the MOldsmobile "Can-Am" 4 valve DOHC motors that never surfaced).
Hope I spelt ever-thing kerrect.
 
G

gnixl

Founding Member
Dec 30, 1998
120
0
0
Apr 5, 2004
#23
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #23
new22003 said:
the 305 and 307 were smog era chevy engines thet never made decent power. The 302 chevy was an awesome solid lifter RPM machine that dominated trans am racing!
Click to expand...

BOSS 302
 
G

gnixl

Founding Member
Dec 30, 1998
120
0
0
Apr 5, 2004
#24
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #24
new22003 said:
the 305 and 307 were smog era chevy engines thet never made decent power. The 302 chevy was an awesome solid lifter RPM machine that dominated trans am racing!
Click to expand...


Sorry, not picking on you (although it probably seems like it). Just my (very) Humble opinion.
 
G

gnixl

Founding Member
Dec 30, 1998
120
0
0
Apr 5, 2004
#25
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #25
BTW: 1 litre == 61.02374 cu. in.

I use and recommend :

http://www.wscope.com/convert.htm
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
591
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
G
4.6L rods and piston into a 5.4L
  • Green mustang
  • Jun 11, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
236
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2025
Green mustang
G
Suspension End link replacement size
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • May 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
142
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 20, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
335
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
634
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?