• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What Cfm Needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimmyDoLittle
  • Start date Start date Aug 20, 2016
J

JimmyDoLittle

Member
Aug 18, 2016
19
1
13
Aug 20, 2016
#1
  • Aug 20, 2016
  • #1
Just got me my first mustang..67 with a 302(org 289)..The carb is 750cfm..am told that is to much..What is the correct cfm for this eng? Thanks..
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Aug 21, 2016
#2
  • Aug 21, 2016
  • #2
JimmyDoLittle said:
Just got me my first mustang..67 with a 302(org 289)..The carb is 750cfm..am told that is to much..What is the correct cfm for this eng? Thanks..
Click to expand...

Probably on the big side unless your a drag racer and your car is set up for it. Original carbs were around 480cfm IIRC.

We would need to know more information about any changes that have been done to the motor, the car, and what you expect out of the car in order to give you a better answer.
 
J

JimmyDoLittle

Member
Aug 18, 2016
19
1
13
Aug 21, 2016
#3
  • Aug 21, 2016
  • #3
Thanks Dennis, I'll get more info as I get more aquainted with it. The PO had it only 2 months and knows nothing..I think I'll keep the 302 as long as it behaves but gotta get the right carb on it..Will 600 CFM be ok?
what does IIRC mean?
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Aug 21, 2016
#4
  • Aug 21, 2016
  • #4
JimmyDoLittle said:
Thanks Dennis, I'll get more info as I get more aquainted with it. The PO had it only 2 months and knows nothing..I think I'll keep the 302 as long as it behaves but gotta get the right carb on it..Will 600 CFM be ok?
what does IIRC mean?
Click to expand...

Is you just want a simple answer, I'd say a 600 Holley with vacuum secondaries would work for you. If your car has an automatic, look for one that has the correct transmission kick down linkage for a Ford.

IIRC is short for "If I Recall Correctly." Its often used on social media when the details were once known, but over time from lack of use get fuzzy in the memory.
 
D

Dirty Rod

Member
Oct 26, 2014
22
8
13
Aug 21, 2016
#5
  • Aug 21, 2016
  • #5
I had a 600 on mine until I went to bigger valves and a larger cam and then a 650 worked better.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 21, 2016
#6
  • Aug 21, 2016
  • #6
i need to know more about the engine combination before i can give you a proper recommendation.

1: what cam is used

2: what intake

3: what heads, and are they ported

4: what exhaust manifolds/headers

5: what compression ratio
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Aug 22, 2016
#7
  • Aug 22, 2016
  • #7
Just a little personal experience: I've used 600 cfm, vacuum secondary Holleys on lots of smaller (289-351) engines for years and have been happy. When I changed my car over to a single 4 barrel a couple years ago, I did some research and found QFT carbs. They're essentially a Holley-type carb but better. They aren't all that much more cost-wise and I'm thrilled with mine.
 
J

JimmyDoLittle

Member
Aug 18, 2016
19
1
13
Aug 22, 2016
#8
  • Aug 22, 2016
  • #8
Thanks for the reply rbohm..the engine is a factory 302 out of a wreck with nothing built..long headers..don't know bout the intake nor comp..I have a fairly new 600 Quik Fuel sitting in the barn..Should this fit the Intake on it now?
 
J

JimmyDoLittle

Member
Aug 18, 2016
19
1
13
Aug 22, 2016
#9
  • Aug 22, 2016
  • #9
zookeeper said:
Just a little personal experience: I've used 600 cfm, vacuum secondary Holleys on lots of smaller (289-351) engines for years and have been happy. When I changed my car over to a single 4 barrel a couple years ago, I did some research and found QFT carbs. They're essentially a Holley-type carb but better. They aren't all that much more cost-wise and I'm thrilled with mine.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I have a QF sitting on the shelf I will try..Thanks Zoo
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,948
2,902
194
Middle of Maine
Aug 22, 2016
#10
  • Aug 22, 2016
  • #10
It is all in how the carb is set up not so much the size of the carb. I could get a 1bb carb to work good on that engine, I could also get a 900 plus cfm carb to work good. It is about metering the fuel for the amount of air coming in, regardless of the cfm rating of the carb. All that being said...a smaller carb is easier to get to work right. So if you have the ability, the 750 cfm carb that is on the car can be made to work just fine.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 22, 2016
#11
  • Aug 22, 2016
  • #11
JimmyDoLittle said:
Thanks for the reply rbohm..the engine is a factory 302 out of a wreck with nothing built..long headers..don't know bout the intake nor comp..I have a fairly new 600 Quik Fuel sitting in the barn..Should this fit the Intake on it now?
Click to expand...

since the engine is basically stock, i would go with the 600cfm carb you have instead of the 780. and both cars will fit the intake since they use the same bolt pattern.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Aug 24, 2016
#12
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #12
I've got too much carb on a stout (420+ HP and TQ) 351W. My 750cfm had to be set pretty lean to get a good idle
 
J

JimmyDoLittle

Member
Aug 18, 2016
19
1
13
Aug 24, 2016
#13
  • Aug 24, 2016
  • #13
Great Info..thank Y'all !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Early ford 302 heads
  • Dagasser
  • May 4, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
61
The Welcome Wagon May 4, 2026
Noobz347
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
628
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
45
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Thursday at 9:56 AM
SophiaTatum
S
Hello
  • TomcatPC
  • Jan 15, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
11
Views
366
The Welcome Wagon Jan 18, 2026
TomcatPC
N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
204
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?