• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What header to use in the $150 range

  • Thread starter Thread starter cas69aus19
  • Start date Start date Sep 29, 2005

cas69aus19

New Member
Sep 14, 2005
50
0
0
B-town NV
Sep 29, 2005
#1
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #1
i need to know. PAW has the hooker comp for 158.98. is there any preference in that price range.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Sep 29, 2005
#2
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #2
i use the generic Shelby try-y,the hooker comps hang too low and get banged up real fast
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 29, 2005
#3
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #3
You have lots of options in that price range. Hedman, Flowtech, Hooker, and Summit all have headers around $150 or less. I personally have Hooker Comps, but they dont fit with power steering(unless you have a bracket, but I chose a manual conversion instead). Most other headers are the same way unless they specifically say they work with P/S. Also, Tri-Ys mostly have 2.5" collectors while 4 into 1s generally have 3".

PAW is a decent place, but dont buy any of their "house brand" stuff. I broke one of their brand new head bolts before getting to 65lb-ft and stretched two others. The bolt heads were marked as grade 8 as well. I got some ARPs and there is no comparison(smooth threads and truly grade 9 or better).
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Sep 29, 2005
#4
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #4
I ran some tri-y's for a while, they were ok and ground clearnace was good. I switched to hooker comps and gained some noticeable horsepower, and ground clearance is still ok, they probably hang 3/4"-1" lower than the tri-y's. It was worth it to me though.
 
1

1Bad67

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
52
0
0
Sep 29, 2005
#5
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #5
My vote goes to a good set of tri-y headers. After bashing the tubes in on several sets of long tube over the years due to ground clearance problems on my lowered '67, I had no problems with the tri-y. And you'll probably have a little more bottom end torque with the Tri-Y. I recently spent the big bucks on a set of JBA coated headers when I put in the new motor.
 
6

67efivert

Member
Jan 26, 2003
348
0
16
lincolnton nc
Sep 29, 2005
#6
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #6
i had some no name long tubes at first hung way too low for me switched to headman shortys and for the mild motor i got couldnt tell hardly any differnce
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Sep 29, 2005
#7
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #7
Dunno if they fit power steering or not. I had a set of heddman 1 5/8's. They were about 160 i think, and the ground clearance was pretty damn good.
 
F

frost0100

Member
Jul 10, 2003
127
0
17
Wilmington, NC
Sep 30, 2005
#8
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #8
I was looking at the summit headers I think they are like $90. My only concern is if they are going to fit with my 68 stang 351W (Auto, powersteering) I guess I'll just have to buy them and Hope for the best...
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Sep 30, 2005
#9
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #9
i have the hedman shorties on my car, and i love them. i had the rest of the exhaust fabbed up at a local muffler shop in 2-1/2" aluminized. none of my exhaust hangs any lower than the subfame rails. they also left me plenty of room for my aod to go in as well. they ran all the pipe down the trans tunnel just like a factory style system would, the would have never been able to that with long tubes
 
C

Clark

Founding Member
Aug 5, 1999
659
0
0
Rowlett,Texas
Sep 30, 2005
#10
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #10
Bnickel, It almost sounded like you were describing my car, the only difference is I had my Hedmans Jet Hot coated and I like the fit on mine as well. Already had to pull my AOD for a seal leaking and did not have to remove the exhaust
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 30, 2005
#11
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #11
frost0100 said:
I was looking at the summit headers I think they are like $90. My only concern is if they are going to fit with my 68 stang 351W (Auto, powersteering) I guess I'll just have to buy them and Hope for the best...
Click to expand...

If they are a 4 into 1 351W swap-specific header, then its highly unlikely they will be plug-and-play.
 
F

frost0100

Member
Jul 10, 2003
127
0
17
Wilmington, NC
Sep 30, 2005
#12
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #12
Here is a pic of them below.. What kind do you think would work for me?



I just got a new 4 barrel intake and carb set to go in, and wanted to get the most of them, so figured headers would be the next best step for me. I was told to stay away from shorties as I would recieve no gains. I have stock manifolds on there now. Would really prefer to go with long tubes, but if shorties are the better route, please advise.
 

Attachments

  • sum-g9031_w.webp
    10.4 KB · Views: 92
C

Clark

Founding Member
Aug 5, 1999
659
0
0
Rowlett,Texas
Oct 1, 2005
#13
  • Oct 1, 2005
  • #13
Frost,

I know that the long tubes are the best way to go and you will see the most gain but whoever told you that you will see no gain from shorty's over stock needs to put there crack pipe down. Just from the standpoint of looking at the design where you see the 4 exhaust ports going into 1 log should stand out as being a little restrictive. The stock 351W exhaust manifolds are better than other one's but to say no gain is not right.

The biggest issue I see with Long tubes are clearance one's if you plan on keeping a stock ride height than you will probably have minimal problems but if you plan on lowering the car than you might reconsider. Another thing about these headers you are looking at is they are probably a 5 to 7 year header than the rust will get them, coated are expensive but they will pay for themselves in how long they last.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Exhaust for 408w stroker
  • SadbutTrue
  • Sep 10, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
143
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 10, 2026
nickyb
3
Autolite 3925 discontinued?
  • 387lx
  • Jan 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2026
Mustang5L5
Brake pad and rotor upgrade
  • Sparky714
  • Aug 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
556
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 17, 2026
Sparky714
My next project , a 428 build!
  • horse sence
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 9 10 11
Replies
202
Views
4K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Yesterday at 5:04 PM
horse sence
D
For Sale 1993 Mustang LX for parts or restore
  • diesel farmer
  • Oct 6, 2026
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
371
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 6, 2026
diesel farmer
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?