• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What Holly carb should I get?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Britt
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

Britt

Founding Member
May 2, 2002
611
0
0
South Carolina
Apr 5, 2004
#1
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #1
Well, Ive had to put the stang on hold for a while, but im back and building an engine. Ive got a 302 im building with E7 heads and flattop pistons. Ive got a comp cams 280H magnum cam and a duel plane high rise intake.

I was going to get a 600 double pumper, but Im not shure. I want decent gas mileage but I also want optimum performance. I want snappy throttle response and good smoothe opperation.

Ill be running a C/4 auto

Im open to educated opinions and responces.
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
Apr 5, 2004
#2
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #2
650cfm Vacuum secondary model 4160 will give you snappy throttle response and good smooth reliable street operation.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Apr 5, 2004
#3
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #3
I agree with the last thread.....600cfm 4160 elec. choke would be a better street carb. Double pumpers are more for the manual transmission crowd.
 
M

madbrad

Member
Mar 6, 2003
72
0
6
Albuquerque NM
Apr 5, 2004
#4
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #4
On my 302 i went from a 600 Vacuum Sec to a double pumper same cfm adn noticed a difference in the acceleration. The VS was a lot better fo my car. Once i got moving i couldnt tell a difference either.
 
6

65 project

New Member
Mar 16, 2003
27
0
0
Apr 5, 2004
#5
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #5
On my 65 GT, I went with the 570 holley avenger with the electric choke. If your HP is over 300, then you will want to go up to the 650.
 

foghorn67

I'll save you the time and choke myself
Founding Member
Jan 10, 2002
1,532
0
46
Orange County, CA
Apr 5, 2004
#6
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #6
go with the street avenger. it's a 4150.
don't get the 4160. it has a secondary metering plate and only 2 idle jets.
it doen't take much to get a 4150 idling smoother then a 4160.

also, mechanical secondaries would be a waste of gas with your trans.
 
B

Britt

Founding Member
May 2, 2002
611
0
0
South Carolina
Apr 5, 2004
#7
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #7
Thanks for the replys.

I didnt want to spend all that much (not over $300 dollars). I thought all 4150s were double pumpers. I just want a basic carb that wont cost alot and I can tune and modify easily. I want a good performing carb and something that want waste gas for no reason.

Also, cant I get a 4160 and also get the kit to make it a 4150 with vac seccondaries or is there a carb in their line that already comes like that??

Thanks again. I realy dont know all that much about the holly line.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Apr 5, 2004
#8
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #8
You can call Holley and they will give you a recommendation. I think you may be running a little too much cam.

Also, if you keep the C4, remember to get a carb with an automatic kickdown lever.
 
B

Britt

Founding Member
May 2, 2002
611
0
0
South Carolina
Apr 5, 2004
#9
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #9
Why do you think Im running to much cam?
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 5, 2004
#10
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #10
Britt said:
Why do you think Im running to much cam?
Click to expand...
What stall converter and rear gears are you running? Then we will know if you have too much cam. If you are running a stock converter and the 2.80 gears in the rear then you definitely have too much cam.
 
B

Britt

Founding Member
May 2, 2002
611
0
0
South Carolina
Apr 6, 2004
#11
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #11
It said I could run a stock stall, but Im working on getting a better one anyway. The gears will be somewhere between 3.80 and 4.10. I put alot of reaserch and time in making my decision and I think I made the right one. If I picked the wrong cam, I will be the first to know, belive me.

BTW, since when did this thread become cam related???
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Apr 6, 2004
#12
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #12
have you read this excellent site? It may help you in your research.

http://www.bob2000.com/carb.htm
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Apr 6, 2004
#13
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #13
A 600cfm Holley would be plenty. Maybe even the 570cfm. You can calculate your maximum air flow needs via;
http://www.classictruckshop.com/garage/shopmathcfm1.asp

Here is a link to a carb. http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLine/Products/FMS/FMSC/0-1850C.html
 
6

67yellowcat

New Member
Nov 11, 2003
5
0
0
Apr 6, 2004
#14
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #14
Hi guys,

Can someone explain why a double pumper is better for a 4sp car than a vac secondary would be ? I've got a 4160 on my 4sp car an am wondering what advantages I might see with a 4150 dp ??

Thanks,

John.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Apr 6, 2004
#15
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #15
If its a mostly-street car, I can predict a serious decline in your gas mileage, unless you tune/tweak it to the nth degree. IMO, regardless of transmission, a DP is best left for the track where fuel economy is irrelevant.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 6, 2004
#16
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #16
Britt said:
BTW, since when did this thread become cam related???
Click to expand...
Well, an engine is a package and should be treated as such. Every part you choose should compliment the others and thus even a small change could have a ripple effect. The cars that run the best are those that have very carefully planned out drivetrains with a purpose in mind. A lot of vehicles are merely average because people tend to use what they already have or have easy cheap access to.

Anyway this is exactly what the Competition Cams catolog says about their Magnum 280H cam:

"Broad Power. 2500 stall, low gears, 9.5:1 & headers. Rough idle."

I'm in no way trying to bash you I am simply trying to help you maximize your performance/$$$. I have been building these cars and making mistakes for 25 years and have learned a lot along the way. Your car will run with a stock C-4 stall but you will have to idle it quite high to keep it from stalling and it could quite easily bog a little off the line but the low gears you are going to be running will help alot and will mask the problems with the stall to a degree.

I was in this exact situation with my Shelby. I have a very similar cam albeit mechanical and with the 3.89 gears it ran quite well but it had to be idled at 1100 RPM in park to not die when put in gear and the 1-2 shift was so abusive that it bent my crossmember and passenger side motor mount saddle a little....and it squared out the holes in the back of my driveshaft. I switched to a 3000 stall and the car is totally different now (but if I had to do it over I would have gotten a 2500 stall but the guy that built mine used a formula to choose).

Oh....the carb....get a 600 0r 650 vacuum secondaries and down the road you can get the secodanries metering block kit if you need the adjustability. Go ahead and get the secondaries spring kit right away to fine tune the secondaries and the car will run very well. You don't need any bigger of a carb and I know quite a few people running in the 12's on a 600 cfm carb.
 
6

65 project

New Member
Mar 16, 2003
27
0
0
Apr 6, 2004
#17
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #17
There was a Dodge dealership selling new Holley Avenger carbs on E-Bay. The 570's were going for under $300.00. That's where I picked up mind. I don't know if they are still selling them, but it was sure a good price. Use Holley avenger for the search.
 
G

geegee

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
2,015
0
0
near Oklahoma City, OK
Apr 6, 2004
#18
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #18
Britt said:
Thanks for the replys.

I didnt want to spend all that much (not over $300 dollars). I thought all 4150s were double pumpers. I just want a basic carb that wont cost alot and I can tune and modify easily. I want a good performing carb and something that want waste gas for no reason.

Also, cant I get a 4160 and also get the kit to make it a 4150 with vac seccondaries or is there a carb in their line that already comes like that??

Thanks again. I realy dont know all that much about the holly line.
Click to expand...

I use a Holley Street Avenger 570cfm atop a Weiand Action Plus dual plane manifold (low rize, dual plane, idle to 6000 rpm bandwidth). Its a good match and was easy to tune. Basically it worked right out of the box. I did re-adjust the float levels because they were a bit high. I adjusted the mixtures to high rpm idle roll off as suggested in the accompanying literature and its been running like that ever since with no further tinkering.

Cost was $285 (mail order).
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Apr 6, 2004
#19
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #19
The question concerning the differnce between a DP and a vac secondary vs type of transmission is a confusing issue. I may be wrong but I believe a DP was designed first to complement the manual transmission. When you romp on the gas it squirts fuel into both the primary and secondary side. If you think about this when you are manually shifting you are stepping on the gas and letting off the gas when shifting which helps to eliminate the bog after romping on the gas again. The vac secondary with an automatic does not experience this continuous gas pedal stomping effect so the diaphram opens only to the need of the engine thus better fuel economy. I think.....?
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Apr 6, 2004
#20
  • Apr 6, 2004
  • #20
There is no secondary side accelerator pump on a vaccum carb. Two accelerator pumps, that is why it is called a double pumper.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
493
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Fuel Carb advice
  • nothwoods
  • Jun 2, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2021
90sickfox
N
What did I do
  • nards444
  • Feb 24, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2020
Habu135
W
venturing into the Ford community. (in a way) new to Mustangs. Love the Foxs. would like some input on front suspension.
  • weigh2fast4u
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 30, 2019
TOOLOW91
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?