• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What ignition/distributor do you run?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sparx
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jan 17, 2010
#21
  • Jan 17, 2010
  • #21
That's the whole Duraspark control box. It does what the 4-pin HEI module does, but costs about 600% more.

Here's some more about The Duraspark II and aftermarket options:
Duraspark Upgrade
 
S

sparx

Member
Sep 2, 2009
369
1
19
Jan 17, 2010
#22
  • Jan 17, 2010
  • #22
Thanks for the link 65, I kind of thought it did the same job.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 17, 2010
#23
  • Jan 17, 2010
  • #23
65ShelbyClone said:
That's where I got the idea for my ignition.



Like I said, 1985 Mustang GT 5-speed. It was carbureted with a roller cam and used Duraspark ignition. I think the automatic GT had throttle body injection and a TFI distributor..
Click to expand...
The throttle body injection used a Duraspark also, but had the flat tappet HO cam. The TFI distributor came out with the 86's SEFI system.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Jan 17, 2010
#24
  • Jan 17, 2010
  • #24
You can use the Ford box, I have two of them on two cars.
I only pointed out the MSD box to show compatibility....
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Jan 18, 2010
#25
  • Jan 18, 2010
  • #25
I am running Pertronix II with their billet distributor and Flamethrower II coil. I think it is an great setup.
 
S

sparx

Member
Sep 2, 2009
369
1
19
Jan 18, 2010
#26
  • Jan 18, 2010
  • #26
2+2GT said:
I have had great service from the C5OF-12127-E distributor. Excellent power, not missing at high rpm, extremely reliable. Dead easy to install, easy to adjust both dwell and advance curve. Call me old fashioned.
Click to expand...

Your not using "points" are you?
sparx
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jan 18, 2010
#27
  • Jan 18, 2010
  • #27
sparx said:
Your not using "points" are you?
sparx
Click to expand...

As a matter of fact…

One night I was on the freeway in a bad area, and at 70 mph it went stone dead. After looking the engine over for about a half hour, I discovered one of the point set's cam follower had broken off, shorting the ignition. A piece of cardboard from the roadside sealed them off, and I got home on the other set. Try that with a dead electronic ignition.

Strictly speaking, though, if the car was still a driver I'd put Pertronix I in.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Jan 18, 2010
#28
  • Jan 18, 2010
  • #28
I'm using Ford's EDIS module, OEM coilpacks, and no distributor. More accurate, multiple sparks (under 1800RPM) and no problems lighting up a .042" gap with 6-7PSI of boost.

Probably more than you are wanting to get into tho.
 
W

waid302

Member
Sep 25, 2012
68
1
9
Apr 4, 2013
#29
  • Apr 4, 2013
  • #29
65ShelbyClone,

I know this is a very old post but I am doing the exact same thing. I am almost done with with 96 Explorer 5.0 build with TFS1 Cam and carb setup. For good street performance, I will be using an '85 Mustang GT 5-speed Duraspark distributor (steel gear for the roller cam) & vacuum advance.

At this point I am not sure to hook it up to a GM 4-pin HEI module or use Duraspark Module. I can the Blue Grommet Duraspark Module for about $20 - same price as HEI module.

As I understand it, the Duraspark does have timing retart for easy starting. Correct?

Is the GM 4-pin HEI module offer better reliability ?

If do get the Duraspark, would the Mustang GT 5-speed Duraspark Module the one I need ?

Thanks
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 4, 2013
#30
  • Apr 4, 2013
  • #30
sparx said:
Me again with more questions.

I am building up a 302 with mild cam and am trying to chose an ignition/distributor system. The engine is a roller cam.

I consider: MSD, Pertronix, and HEI.
I am not racing the car so I don't need the very top item. I am also somewhat confused (as always ) in regards to needing the electronic box that sells with the ignition sets.

Also I am not sure about which wire set to use.

I am running a carbureted system btw.

TIA
sparx
Click to expand...

go simple and reliable. start with an 85 GT distributor. get the one from a 5spd model as that way you get the carb version of the dist. it will be more expensive as it has a steel gear installed for the roller cam. wire that dist to a mopar orange ignition box, you can find a wiring diagram at www.gofastforless.com. the wiring is quite simple. top it off with an msd blaster lll ignition coil, and you will have an ignition that will light off reliably in nearly all weather conditions.
 
W

waid302

Member
Sep 25, 2012
68
1
9
Apr 5, 2013
#31
  • Apr 5, 2013
  • #31
rbohm, I see that you have a 64 Falcon. Well, this is what I am working on right now and need ignition for it!

Waid
 

Attachments

  • P1010317b-50 - Copy.webp
    56.7 KB · Views: 299

candoo

New Member
Jan 26, 2007
7
0
1
Apr 5, 2013
#32
  • Apr 5, 2013
  • #32
You most likely dont need this set up but I will throw in anyway. I use a MSD pro billit dissy that has no vac advance and is locked out at 35 degrees. Control box is the digital 6 with a HRC2 coil.
I like the digital set up as I can program my own timing curve. This allows me to start at around 4 deg of advance to about 400 rpm then idle at around 17 deg. From there a curve from 17 to 35 degrees all in at
about 3200 rpm. Many other options with the software and nice for tuning as you can see your RPM and ignition timing with your laptop beside you. Whatever you buy make sure the dissy gear is the correct material.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Apr 5, 2013
#33
  • Apr 5, 2013
  • #33
waid302 said:
65ShelbyClone,

1.) At this point I am not sure to hook it up to a GM 4-pin HEI module or use Duraspark Module. I can the Blue Grommet Duraspark Module for about $20 - same price as HEI module.

2.) As I understand it, the Duraspark does have timing retart for easy starting. Correct?

3.) Is the GM 4-pin HEI module offer better reliability?

4.) If do get the Duraspark, would the Mustang GT 5-speed Duraspark Module the one I need?
Click to expand...

1.) I'm not sure what you want to do either. Personally, I used a four-pin HEI module because it was cheap and convenient. If you can get the right Duraspark parts for a comparable price, I think that would be a better way to go. The Duraspark distributor will plug into the Duraspark harness; no cutting necessary as with mine.

2.) Yes, it does. Nice, but not really necessary with 9:1 compression street engines though. None of the 11:1 horsepower war engines had any kind of cranking retard that I'm aware of.

3.) I highly doubt one is more durable than the other. It's easier and cheaper to keep a spare HEI module in the car, which is what I'm doing until the EFI swap happens. Then if the coil driver pops in my ECU, I'm just SOL and have to get towed.

4.) I suppose. I want to point out that I haven't used a Duraspark box. Everything you need to know about hooking up either one in this thread.
 
W

waid302

Member
Sep 25, 2012
68
1
9
Apr 5, 2013
#34
  • Apr 5, 2013
  • #34
Before I bought my Ford Falcon, I had a 1977 Olds Omega (Chevy Nova) which had a Carb setup. At one time, I was going to swap to TBI setup. For this I pulled a wireharness, computer, distributor, coil and all from a mid 80's chevy truck.

I found a link below and realized that I could use the 8-pin HEI that is in the TBI distributor which I have already along with the coil with my Duraspark Distributor. I am going to take apart the TBI distributor and see which 8 pin HEI module I have.

http://tc.wagoneer.org/2012/08/gm-tbi-ignition-wiring.html
Going to try to use everthing that I have already first !
 

Attachments

  • Duraspark.webp
    81.7 KB · Views: 331
  • TBI_1227747_ignition.webp
    24.4 KB · Views: 433
  • TBI_Wiring_1.webp
    82 KB · Views: 410

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 5, 2013
#35
  • Apr 5, 2013
  • #35
waid302 said:
rbohm, I see that you have a 64 Falcon. Well, this is what I am working on right now and need ignition for it!

Waid
Click to expand...

same body style as mine. which engine do you have?
 

restomoded66

Member
Mar 29, 2010
39
0
6
Apr 5, 2013
#36
  • Apr 5, 2013
  • #36
I'm running a rebuild duraspark II distributor with a flame thrower coil and Street Fire MSD ignition. Has rev limiter and is small enought to hide under the battery tray. I'm realy happy with it and love the rev limiter. Used to run durasark box, coil and wire harness from a 86 F250. had to many problem with open wire.
 
W

waid302

Member
Sep 25, 2012
68
1
9
Apr 5, 2013
#37
  • Apr 5, 2013
  • #37
I have the 170 with 3 speed which will be coming out shortly. Going in: 1996 Explorer 5.0 with GT40 heads, TFS1 Cam, Alex Parts upgraded valve springs, Explorer 8.8 rear with 3.73. Here is the interesting part. I am putting in a T5 from a 3.8 V6 Musatng and yes a 3.8 V6 Bell housing. I found a way to use the 3.8 V6 Bell housing with the smaller 5.0 flywheel and hydraulic slave and master to boot. It took a while but managed to find a 70k 5.0, took it apart completely , rehoned it and will be assembling with new rings, gaskets etc...

Waid
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Apr 6, 2013
#38
  • Apr 6, 2013
  • #38
The dura spark is great with an automatic..however with my t5 I kept over revving it under full throttle runs..I finally ditched it for an msd dizzy and crane ignition that has adjustable rev limiter

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Apr 7, 2013
#39
  • Apr 7, 2013
  • #39
woodsnake said:
Why would you put ANYTHING GM on your Mustang??
Click to expand...

Not related to the OP, but there are reasons occasionally to run GM products a TH400 or a Glide might be a better option than a C-4 when you get past what a C-4 can hold.

Anyways, I run the MSD crank trigger, MSD pro dissy locked out, the programmable MSD 6, and the MSD HVC-2 coil. I've had good luck with it so far. Timing is solid and does not move throughout the RPM band. With the programmable box there a quite a bit of options and room for growth. It has build in capabilities that will cover most street/strip vehicle needs. Probably not necessary for the OP. When I was a kid I had a blaster 2 coil, 6 AL, and used the standard non-vac MSD dissy. I used the weights/spring setup and allowed it to advance the timing. Also had good results with it. The car was much more tame then. The throttle response was very crisp. I thought it ran better than my friends who had fox body FI stangs.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Apr 13, 2013
#40
  • Apr 13, 2013
  • #40
"Not related to the OP, but there are reasons occasionally to run GM products a TH400 or a Glide might be a better option than a C-4 when you get past what a C-4 can hold."
Meh....
I am not convinced that GM does anything actually "better" than Ford. Or Chrysler, for that matter. I guess I am kind of a brand "purist" though.
I am that guy that gets offended when people put small block yvehc motors in anything built by Ford.
I am looking forward to the day when my Cougar's are done, that I can get on my pick up project, which is a 55 chevy PU, powered by FORD.
429/C6 or AOD/9-inch....Just to hear people bitch about it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
316
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
791
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
528
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
370
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?