- Jun 11, 2003
- 485
- 0
- 16
besides by the way they look different what are the gains from these midpipes which one is better?? Which is louder?? i want a loud midpipe
What is The Difference between an H pipe and Prochamber??
- Thread starter GreekStang85
- Start date
the prochamber is probably the quietest O/R midpipe u can get, but it also has the deepest tone, regular h will be louder. the prochamber is SUPPOSED to have similar hp numbers to an x-pipe, i dunno about that but it seems logical that it would flow more than a regular h, thats why i got one, seemed like the best of both worlds to me.
Venom_Nitrous
Founding Member
The prochamber has the "chamber" that merges the exhaust gasses and swirls them. That is supposed to create almost like a vacuum and pull the exhaust from the cylinders. More exhaust out equals more power. Be aware of leaks by the manifolds with it.
- Jun 11, 2003
- 485
- 0
- 16
i want to get bbk longtubes(i dont trust mac headers from all the people complaining about them) but i dont know if the prochamber will fit fine with the headers thats why i am thinking about buying the o/r h pipe but i like the sound of the prochamber.
stangman
15 Year Member
prochamber sounds amazing 
it's a mix between a X & a H. & makes nice power. i've had 3 on different stangs & i get compliments all the time
it's a mix between a X & a H. & makes nice power. i've had 3 on different stangs & i get compliments all the time
- Jun 11, 2003
- 485
- 0
- 16
What LT's do you have?c2see21 said:prochamber sounds amazing
stangman
15 Year Member
GreekStang85 said:
mac
the only problem i ever had with them, is i had a crack in the driver side header when we put them on this stang. but we called them & told them. they overnighted another header to us to correct the situation. IMO mac gets a lot of crap because people talk about stuff they have heard & it gets spread like that. granted that they did have some quality control issues a while back but they have made large strides to rectify the problems. i've never had a bad experience with mac. but i would recommend the ceramic (ceramac) coated ones
- Jun 11, 2003
- 485
- 0
- 16
stangman
15 Year Member
- Jun 11, 2003
- 485
- 0
- 16
stangman
15 Year Member
GreekStang85 said:
i don't have any gains from just a prochamber, but i did gain 18rwhp from mac lt's & a prochamber on a mustang dyno. so it would have been over 20 rwhp on a dynojet dyno
- Jun 11, 2003
- 485
- 0
- 16
