• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

What is The Difference between an H pipe and Prochamber??

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreekStang85
  • Start date Start date Sep 1, 2004

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Sep 1, 2004
#1
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #1
besides by the way they look different what are the gains from these midpipes which one is better?? Which is louder?? i want a loud midpipe
 
S

spikeGT_99

New Member
May 3, 2004
184
0
0
Jackson, Ms
Sep 1, 2004
#2
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #2
the prochamber is probably the quietest O/R midpipe u can get, but it also has the deepest tone, regular h will be louder. the prochamber is SUPPOSED to have similar hp numbers to an x-pipe, i dunno about that but it seems logical that it would flow more than a regular h, thats why i got one, seemed like the best of both worlds to me.
 

Venom_Nitrous

Founding Member
Aug 23, 2002
416
1
0
Spearfish, SD
Sep 1, 2004
#3
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #3
The prochamber has the "chamber" that merges the exhaust gasses and swirls them. That is supposed to create almost like a vacuum and pull the exhaust from the cylinders. More exhaust out equals more power. Be aware of leaks by the manifolds with it.
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Sep 1, 2004
#4
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #4
i want to get bbk longtubes(i dont trust mac headers from all the people complaining about them) but i dont know if the prochamber will fit fine with the headers thats why i am thinking about buying the o/r h pipe but i like the sound of the prochamber.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Sep 1, 2004
#5
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #5
prochamber sounds amazing it's a mix between a X & a H. & makes nice power. i've had 3 on different stangs & i get compliments all the time
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Sep 1, 2004
#6
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #6
c2see21 said:
prochamber sounds amazing it's a mix between a X & a H. & makes nice power. i've had 3 on different stangs & i get compliments all the time
Click to expand...
What LT's do you have?
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Sep 1, 2004
#7
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #7
GreekStang85 said:
What LT's do you have?
Click to expand...


mac the only problem i ever had with them, is i had a crack in the driver side header when we put them on this stang. but we called them & told them. they overnighted another header to us to correct the situation. IMO mac gets a lot of crap because people talk about stuff they have heard & it gets spread like that. granted that they did have some quality control issues a while back but they have made large strides to rectify the problems. i've never had a bad experience with mac. but i would recommend the ceramic (ceramac) coated ones
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Sep 1, 2004
#8
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #8
so an o/r H pipe is louder than a prochamber??
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Sep 1, 2004
#9
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #9
GreekStang85 said:
so an o/r H pipe is louder than a prochamber??
Click to expand...


yup, but a prochamber has a better sound IMO
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Sep 1, 2004
#10
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #10
what are the gains people see from both the o/r H and the prochamber??
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Sep 2, 2004
#11
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #11
GreekStang85 said:
what are the gains people see from both the o/r H and the prochamber??
Click to expand...


i don't have any gains from just a prochamber, but i did gain 18rwhp from mac lt's & a prochamber on a mustang dyno. so it would have been over 20 rwhp on a dynojet dyno
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Sep 2, 2004
#12
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #12
thats a nice gain
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
High idle 2003 Mach 1
  • JohnnyUtah
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
158
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 31, 2026
JohnnyUtah
J
E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
112
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
9
Engine 2.3 fox body upgrades from sn95
  • 92ponyboy
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
4
Views
318
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 25, 2026
NXcoupe
N
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
228
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Motor mounts question
  • djj62478
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
453
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?