• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

What is the problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pokageek
  • Start date Start date Oct 24, 2008

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 24, 2008
#1
  • Oct 24, 2008
  • #1
Hi guys. I have a lul from 2000-2500 rpm and there is a 100rwtq climb from 2500rpm to 3000rpm. I go from 300rwtq to 400rwtq...in 500 rpm!! It seems a bit too radical a jump for the car and sometimes it pops. I drive this range all day and it gets on my nerves a bit. It wasn't this way right after I had the long tubes on IIRC. It was smoother with No dip in it.. So what is the problem? My tuner said he shut off the 02 sensors so it will idle right and I don't remember it being this way right AFTER I had them put on. My a/f is perfect and they cant find anything wrong and say its just the radical cam. I am getting 20mpg which is strange in a 500+HP car.

LT Headers AFR 205's
2000 rpm=310rwtq
2250 rpm=280rwtq
2500 rpm=305rwtq
3000 rpm=400rwtq
the rest of the curve its over 400rwtq until 5600rpm

Shorties AFR 205's
2000 rpm=280rwtq
2250 rpm=300rwtq
2500 rpm=325rwtq
3000 rpm=340rwtq
3750 rpm=400rwtq
the rest of the curve is above 400rwtq until 5200 rpm

Shorties Pro-Comps
2000 rpm=325rwtq
2250 rpm=340rwtq
2500 rpm=360rwtq
3000 rpm=370rwtq
4000 rpm=400rwtq
the rest of the curve is above 400rwtq until 4300rpm then straight down
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 24, 2008
#2
  • Oct 24, 2008
  • #2
I think it has something to do with the 02's and the long tubes. The engine runs great and rock and rolls. AF is perfect.
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Oct 25, 2008
#3
  • Oct 25, 2008
  • #3
20 MPG---500 RWHP

Why are you complaining you should be applying for a Job at FORD.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 25, 2008
#4
  • Oct 25, 2008
  • #4
LOL. Its just that after the long tubes the computer adjusted or something down low. Yea I went 181 miles on 9 gallons yesterday.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Oct 25, 2008
#5
  • Oct 25, 2008
  • #5
Last time I went 181 miles it was on 11.5 gallons. You must do all highway driving or don't romp on it much. Personally, I have to hit 6 grand at least once every time I drive it.

I don't really have any help to offer on your problem. Popping usually means it's lean I think. Mine would do the before I had it tuned, but I think it was because of bad O2 sensors. I changed them right before having it tuned and seemed to run a lot better.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 25, 2008
#6
  • Oct 25, 2008
  • #6
THIS KINDA THING! ... Boys and Girls ... Is where datalogging is KING :Word:

You would wanna duplicate the driving condition while gathering data

You would then adjust the various tables based upon the data you saw
to make things more favorable

Just like Velveeta ... Easy Cheezee !!!

Again ... Hard Data ... It has no opinion and it don't lie

I can only guess

Did he kill the O2's just at idle or what

Are you just easing into the throttle or going to the floor?

never the less ... The data should tell you what is needed

Grady
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Oct 25, 2008
#7
  • Oct 25, 2008
  • #7
Speaking of that, is there a way to data log without a tweecer? I was looking into different self tuning methods a couple weeks ago and didn't really find anything for OBD I datalogging, everything is for 96+ OBD II.

Since I already have a SCT chip, I was looking at the SCT Pro Racers Package. It comes with the software and chip burner for around $700 ( ), but I couldn't find any way to data log with it. If there was a way to pull the tune from my SCT and transfer to a tweecer chip, that's something I might be interested in doing...


Back on topic, I think I see what Grady is getting at.... Could the dip in power be caused by the O2's kicking on/off? I know a friend of mine has a weird dip on his dyno charts that he says is something to do with the PMS tuner. Maybe something about the injectors since he's using 55# or some odd # like that.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 26, 2008
#8
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #8
Thanks Grady. It does that when I am easing the throttle. Its ever so slight but is still there. LT's added a ton of power overall though. When I got 20 mpg I was flooring it a few times and driving 100mph from PA to lower part of MD late at night with no cars. No kidding.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 26, 2008
#9
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #9
Low-5.0 said:
Speaking of that, is there a way to data log without a tweecer? I was looking into different self tuning methods a couple weeks ago and didn't really find anything for OBD I datalogging, everything is for 96+ OBD II.

Since I already have a SCT chip, I was looking at the SCT Pro Racers Package. It comes with the software and chip burner for around $700 ( ), but I couldn't find any way to data log with it. If there was a way to pull the tune from my SCT and transfer to a tweecer chip, that's something I might be interested in doing...


Back on topic, I think I see what Grady is getting at.... Could the dip in power be caused by the O2's kicking on/off? I know a friend of mine has a weird dip on his dyno charts that he says is something to do with the PMS tuner. Maybe something about the injectors since he's using 55# or some odd # like that.
Click to expand...

Well Mr. Mike

It won't take long for me to exhaust my knowledge about datalogging
if using interfaces other than the Tweecer method

I do know PMS can datalog but it requires additional software

I do know SCT can as well but have no specific knowledge
but
I do know for certain, Don 95GT has addressed the issue in past threads
so
It wouldn't be too hard to find the straight scoop

Grady
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 26, 2008
#10
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #10
Pokageek said:
Thanks Grady. It does that when I am easing the throttle. Its ever so slight but is still there. LT's added a ton of power overall though. When I got 20 mpg I was flooring it a few times and driving 100mph from PA to lower part of MD late at night with no cars. No kidding.
Click to expand...

Hey Keith

I can only make a WAG here
but
The info you provided makes me wanna think along these lines

Since you say it happens when you ease on the skinny pedal
and
When you are at a very low rpm

The issue has to be occuring under a light load

With a combo such as yours ... you could have these kinda things going
on when driving at a light load

The spark could be quite high
The fuel could be fairly fat due to the big inj's

Then ... you said he killed the O2's to get it to idle better
so
You'd be getting no help from the pcm's adaptive strategy

I can say I had to do the same due to my narrow 109 lsa cam
and
I did have to do a bit of tweecing to make it all play nice together

Like Mike said above, it could be a transition thing

You know ... the O2's are not smoothly coming back in place

Little issues such as this is where a general knowledge of how the pcm
does its thing can be such a B I G advantage :Word:

I once had a similar problem of a nasty lean spike when I would go from
a light load, almost closed throttle, to a WOT condition

I tried + and - of fuel/spark with no success

Then I found the answer while searching the various tuning forums

Work with the plenum size of the upper intake ... Problem solved

Just a random thought or two ... I guess

Good Luck with finding the problem

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 26, 2008
#11
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #11
Thanks Grady for the help. My AF is perfect according to the tuner. Its not too bad but the car was smoother and had more low end in that range with the shorties.

I am selling my short block and going TURBO 393 anyway. I will probably sell the accufabs lt and 3" mid pipe anyway. Thanks for the help guys. If I were to keep the engine I would go PMS or somtehing or go back to shorties.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 26, 2008
#12
  • Oct 26, 2008
  • #12
Pokageek said:
Thanks Grady for the help. My AF is perfect according to the tuner. Its not too bad but the car was smoother and had more low end in that range with the shorties.

I am selling my short block and going TURBO 393 anyway. I will probably sell the accufabs lt and 3" mid pipe anyway. Thanks for the help guys. If I were to keep the engine I would go PMS or somtehing or go back to shorties.
Click to expand...

Always glad to try and help a fellow :SNSign: Stanger

I'd be willing to bet the biggest steak in Fort Worth, Texas

You could make that bad boy behave as you wish within the Tune

I'd certainly go that route before hosing around with parts and such

Good Luck with the new combo

Grady
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Oct 27, 2008
#13
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #13
Pokageek said:
Thanks Grady for the help. My AF is perfect according to the tuner. Its not too bad but the car was smoother and had more low end in that range with the shorties.

I am selling my short block and going TURBO 393 anyway. I will probably sell the accufabs lt and 3" mid pipe anyway. Thanks for the help guys. If I were to keep the engine I would go PMS or somtehing or go back to shorties.
Click to expand...

Haha, I was just thinking about doing the same thing. You may want to look into going with a smaller CI, like 360-370 range. The problem with big strokers is they move a ton of air, too much for smaller turbos. If you're going with a huge turbo and lots of boost it shouldn't be a problem.

I'm just repeating what I've read here, so I could be wrong. Don @ Lasota posted that (or something similar) a while ago.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Oct 27, 2008
#14
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #14
The Zeitronix ZT-2 wideband may be just want you want for logging as it will take in quite a few valuable inputs: Wide Band Air Fuel Ratio Meter

SCT doesn't provide anything for logging EEC-IV. twEECer is king for logging on these cars, I would just be guessing trying to tune without one, especially on the CBAZA cars. BinaryEditor/twEECer combo really kicks some tail. Add in a DataQ to log AFR/Boost/Fuel Pressure and you have a kicking little setup priced very competitively. Give me a shout if you want to discuss PRP and other options in more detail.

Wes
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 27, 2008
#15
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #15
Pokageek said:
Yea I went 181 miles on 9 gallons yesterday.
Click to expand...

i still have a hard time with this ... now you know me well enough to know that i'm not calling BS, but something just doesn't sound right here. please tell me what gears you have, whether your speedo is accurate, and if you have verified that your odometer is accurate.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 27, 2008
#16
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #16
LOL. Sure Chris. I have 3.55 gears, my spedo is prolly 3 mph fast IF that - which I dont think 3mph would affect much. Does it? Yes my odometer is accurate.

The tuner even said I must be getting great gas mileage with my AF, what ever that means. Now here's something different. My trans is a 5 speed and I had a special 5th gear put in at a .64 ratio.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 27, 2008
#17
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #17
ah ... the tranny ...

holy crap! new signature? geez bro, why not just leave well enough alone?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 27, 2008
#18
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #18
Thought I'd jump in here real quick

The thing about our Hot Rods that is kinda shocking

They can get pretty reasonable gas mileage ......
on the highway at steady cruise at a reasonable speed

But

Driving around town

Who builds a ... Hot Rod ... To Drive it like their Grandmaw :Word:

Then ... You get the opportunity to see

Those "Big Ole Injectors"... They really can pass a lot of fuel

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 27, 2008
#19
  • Oct 27, 2008
  • #19
Well Chris, I decided I have really turned tis thing into a monster. I dont want a rumblin shakinn, no cat stinky bucking vehicle. I want a quieter, smoother, non-smelly Lightening speed car. SO I am going for it.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Nov 9, 2008
#20
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #20
UPDATE: Ok, I disconnected the battery last night because I was fixing the rear window power motor thingy... I went out to drive it today after taking my panhard bar off and NO MORE HESITATION! It is the dam computer adjusting to my LT's again. Sheesh, I just need to find a tuner to tune it out. Amazing that the puter is learning a strategy that I dont want. At least I know what it was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?