• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

What now?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OC Stang
  • Start date Start date Oct 17, 2008
O

OC Stang

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
83
0
0
Orange County, CA
Oct 17, 2008
#1
  • Oct 17, 2008
  • #1
I just got my car dyno tuned today and I was running super lean. Car runs much smoother now. I put down 251/285.

So basically I believe I am maxed on on power without getting into the engine or adding a power adder of some sort. Only thing I have not done is touch the headers, but those seem like such a pain to do if I stop there. You should be able to see what I have in my signature. Any thoughts on something else I can do to my car power wise? Where do I go from here? Also I have 98k miles on the car now.
 

evil281

New Member
Jan 6, 2008
276
0
0
Arizona
Oct 18, 2008
#2
  • Oct 18, 2008
  • #2
100 shot, done!
 
O

OC Stang

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
83
0
0
Orange County, CA
Oct 18, 2008
#3
  • Oct 18, 2008
  • #3
evil281 said:
100 shot, done!
Click to expand...


Not interested in running NOS...thanks though.
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
60
Seattle, WA
Oct 18, 2008
#4
  • Oct 18, 2008
  • #4
3.73's or 4.10's.
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Oct 18, 2008
#5
  • Oct 18, 2008
  • #5
not to hijack (too much...)

where'd you get it tuned?...I'm looking for somebody in the soCal for a dyno tune


and I don't see cams in your sig...that might be a good 'next step'
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Oct 18, 2008
#6
  • Oct 18, 2008
  • #6
cams and lt's.........
 
B

blubullett

Member
Jun 22, 2006
535
6
18
Modesto, CA
Oct 18, 2008
#7
  • Oct 18, 2008
  • #7
Ported heads, stage one cams, and some jba shortubes. Long tubes are better but you would have so swap them to smog.
 
O

OC Stang

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
83
0
0
Orange County, CA
Oct 19, 2008
#8
  • Oct 19, 2008
  • #8
mransr said:
not to hijack (too much...)

where'd you get it tuned?...I'm looking for somebody in the soCal for a dyno tune


and I don't see cams in your sig...that might be a good 'next step'
Click to expand...

I thought about cams and LTs as others mentioned, but I don't really want to bother with the LTs unless I can pass smog with them. I don't want to switch those out every time I have to smog. Too much of a pain. Maybe cams, but I have heard they won't add too much power for the money.

As for the tune, I got it from SoCalTuning.com. They are located in Anaheim. They are also known as Superior Automotive. Socaltuning.com will put you in touch with the appropriate person. Owners name is Shawn.
 

nyuk98gt

15 Year Member
Oct 10, 2000
1,427
6
79
Chesterfield, MO
Oct 19, 2008
#9
  • Oct 19, 2008
  • #9
OC Stang:

After you get gears, cams WILL produce a good increase in power. Some cams will produce up to 40 RWHP at peak and 15 to 25 RWHP 'on average'. Choose wisely because an aggressive cam will (a) give you smog problems and (b) produce power at high RPM and (c) generally reduce hp/torque at low RPM. If this is your daily driver and not a frequent dragstrip car, then you ought to consider 'stage 1' cams: good gains without bad side effects.

HTH,

Chris
 
G

GettinThere

Member
Jul 29, 2005
553
1
19
Central Texas
Oct 20, 2008
#10
  • Oct 20, 2008
  • #10
Crzyhrse said:
3.73's or 4.10's.
Click to expand...

+1 on the 4.10s
 
O

OC Stang

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
83
0
0
Orange County, CA
Oct 21, 2008
#11
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #11
nyuk98gt said:
OC Stang:

After you get gears, cams WILL produce a good increase in power. Some cams will produce up to 40 RWHP at peak and 15 to 25 RWHP 'on average'. Choose wisely because an aggressive cam will (a) give you smog problems and (b) produce power at high RPM and (c) generally reduce hp/torque at low RPM. If this is your daily driver and not a frequent dragstrip car, then you ought to consider 'stage 1' cams: good gains without bad side effects.

HTH,

Chris
Click to expand...


Yeah, I would consider stage one cams, but definitely don't want smog problems or lose any low rpm power. That is what i like the most. I don't rev her out too much. Definitely not dragstrip car. I just like punching it on streets and freeways. Or just plain showing off.
 

R.J.

Member
Aug 20, 2003
813
0
16
46
Warwick, Rhode Island
Oct 21, 2008
#12
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #12
+2 4:10 gears
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Oct 21, 2008
#13
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #13
You can really show off with a supercharger. Not to hijack but what was your hp and tq before the tune or did you not get a baseline?
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Oct 21, 2008
#14
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #14
That is pretty good numbers for a light bolt on Stang. Cams are worth it if you do it yourself or if you can find a lightly used set cheap. I picked up mine with about 6000 miles on them for 350. Nearly 75K miles later and still going strong.
 
O

OC Stang

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
83
0
0
Orange County, CA
Oct 22, 2008
#15
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #15
Mattstang04 said:
You can really show off with a supercharger. Not to hijack but what was your hp and tq before the tune or did you not get a baseline?
Click to expand...


I did not get a full baseline. They tried to do one but cut it off before winding it out.
My car was detonating big time. It was running very very lean. Was like above 14 or 15 in A/F Ratio. Measurement was 219hp at first, but like I said did not wind it all the way up. Made some adjustments on second run got 239hp. Then adjusted again and got the 251. The guys said he was gonna try and get 260, but forgot that mustangs he tuned that got that high had long tubes.
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Oct 22, 2008
#16
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #16
Im currently considering cams. Seems like the next step to more horsepower without getting a supercharger. If you havent got gears yet, you will not be let down. I have a long commute so I got 3.73s. If I didnt want a supercharger in the future and worked closer to home I would have gotten 4.10s. Seems like everyone I see with 4.10s has broke into the 13s in the quarter mile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Keeping O2 sensors lit with long tube headers
  • keel
  • Jul 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
117
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
AeroCoupe
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
690
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
280
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
96
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?