• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Whatever happened to that long thread about TB sizes and flow?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date May 2, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
May 10, 2007
#21
  • May 10, 2007
  • #21
I was asked, "Have you ever started a car w/o the intake by mistake?... I did, and there's no better throttle response than that." They've dyno'd different TB sizes and have come up with more power along the rpm's than the smaller one. I'm not sure if there's a TOO BIG, but I took it as there wasn't. We really didn't go into depth about the discussion because apparently I was the 1millionth person who had asked. All they said was that there's a lot of difference between theory and practice.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 10, 2007
#22
  • May 10, 2007
  • #22
And there were no side effects from the bigger TB on a daily driver? That seems kinda key to me.

If someone talks about a big difference in practice vs theory, I would ask for facts backing what was found during practice (dyno runs with both set-ups from the same session and with the car not coming unstrapped or being changed otherwise). Also, candid opinions about daily drivability would be nice too.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
May 10, 2007
#23
  • May 10, 2007
  • #23
I'll pm them and see what they tell me and I'll pm you back Hissin. I really don't want anyone to get upset or anything.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 11, 2007
#24
  • May 11, 2007
  • #24
Who is this 'source'? I think I have a good idea who....

I like JT's thinking...go figure

Let's take a big EFI intake like the Victor 5.0 where the actual inlet (just after the throttle body bolt holes) is around 65mm, or a bit less. How is a 75 or 90mm throttle body helping the case? The intake can only take in so much. And yet I see people saying get the 75 or even 90 mm for 302's and some strokers (non-351 based).

Not all XXmm throttle bodies flow the same. One 65mm doesn't flow as much as another 65mm.

I have yet to see a definitive dyno run that showed an actual gain without some changes in between runs. Of all the time I have been on stangnet, I'm still searching...

You would think by now something would come up without other variables besides just a throttle body swap.

How can you get gains across the rpm range, like on a dyno for example that starts at 2,000 rpm. On a 302 that would imply that a 65mm couldn't flow at 2,000 rpm but a 75mm throttle body could flow plenty at 6,000 rpm. That does not make sense. Take a look at the thread I got above that JT posted on why gains are seen 'across the board'...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Putting 1991 Hatch on 1986 Car - What Size/Thread Hinge Bolts?
  • frwgt350net
  • Jun 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
164
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
Mcmahst
L
93 2.3L 5 speed manual with los of power
  • leadfoot67217
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
0
Views
169
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jan 27, 2026
leadfoot67217
L
W
03 cobra shifter question
  • Wtupribs
  • Sep 7, 2025
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
231
SVT Tech Forum Sep 8, 2025
Wtupribs
W
J
'04 3.8L V6 mineral deposits and oil on #3 cylinder. Does it need a rebuild or something simpler?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
288
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Friday at 3:06 PM
gkomo
N
Thermostat housing
  • nataliaisafraid
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
229
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Apr 2, 2026
Cmrd
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?