Don't need to read facts? Ah, yes, you're going with the uninformed opinion rule?
Like The Mustang being a pumped up Fairmont platform? Back to you not reading the article - guess you missed where SRT-4's were handing LS1's their Azzez on the road coarses...after the LS1's owned the title for years?
Because I spent about $10,000 more sticker on my Mustang GT then I paid for my new SRT-4...and had to ADD about $2,500 in mods so I could STILL get beat by basically **stock** SRT-4?
1000x better than you using the won't-read-the-facts-or-test-results-unable-to-speak-from-owner-experience argument?
Last time I checked, Dodge showed a profit while Ford and GM showed a loss. Yes?
Because they don't lay on a 40-year-old design and build on it 2 decades too long?
More of you not knowing what you're talking about - I've seen several Mustang owners at the SRT-4 forums that had similarly modded Mustangs...and they don't miss their Mustangs and, shock the world, actually enjoy their SRT-4's better. What the heck?
Like saying decades of Mustangs are just cooler looking Granadas and Fairmonts?
Like I said, if the SRT-4's could do no better than low 15's to high 14's with a good driver, instead of high 13's (at Mustang V6 prices) ...I have a sneaky feeling that Mustang owners wouldn't have as many reasons to get all nasty when they see "SRT-4" - I was the same way...before I actually bought one. Oh well...