• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Whats everyone favorite year classic mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1968stang
  • Start date Start date Sep 26, 2002

What's everyone favorite year classic mustang?

  • 1964, 1965, & 1966

    Votes: 42 26.4%
  • 1967, & 1968

    Votes: 60 37.7%
  • 1969, & 1970

    Votes: 45 28.3%
  • 1971, 1972, & 1973

    Votes: 12 7.5%

  • Total voters
    159
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

1968stang

Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,062
13
69
North Carolina
Sep 26, 2002
#1
  • Sep 26, 2002
  • #1
What's everyone favorite year classic mustang
 
T

TheMusclestang

Founding Member
Jul 15, 2002
1,845
0
0
Va ... lived in Joisey for a spell < what a ch
Sep 26, 2002
#2
  • Sep 26, 2002
  • #2
there is only one Real mustang .....1969 FB . Although the 90 GT looks nice .
 

1968stang

Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,062
13
69
North Carolina
Sep 26, 2002
#3
  • Sep 26, 2002
  • #3
I like the 67 and 68 mustangs
 
T

theorama2000

Founding Member
Jan 27, 2002
1,754
0
0
orange county ca
Sep 26, 2002
#4
  • Sep 26, 2002
  • #4
i dunno how i can vote for this. i only like fastbacks hehe.......
but on the fastback scale, its :

65-66 are the greatest lookin cars ever
then 69-70, they are a CLOSE second
then 67-68 they are nice
71+

i guess il vote for first gen since theyare kinda my fav
 

72grande

Founding Member
May 27, 2002
676
0
0
Sunny D
Sep 26, 2002
#5
  • Sep 26, 2002
  • #5
I's gots to be loayale. Moosestang's ROCK!
 

2nd Mustang

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
2,488
0
46
Southern California
Sep 26, 2002
#6
  • Sep 26, 2002
  • #6
67-68 of course!
 
M

MrWesson22

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2000
102
0
0
Dacula, GA
Sep 26, 2002
#7
  • Sep 26, 2002
  • #7
69 of course! No mustang screams MUSCLE like a black 69 sportsroof.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Sep 27, 2002
#8
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #8
I think I'm on the winning team with '65 & '66.
 

67stangboy

Founding Member
Jan 6, 2002
526
0
17
Granite City
Sep 27, 2002
#9
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #9
not that im biased but 66-67
 

tylers65

I've got your tool right here!
Jan 7, 2001
3,278
0
57
Tacoma, WA
Sep 27, 2002
#10
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #10
Um....well...........maaaaaybe.....................1965
 
G

geegee

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
2,015
0
0
near Oklahoma City, OK
Sep 27, 2002
#11
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #11
Although I own a classic '65fb now, I like the '67fb better. It has more sophistication, looks more agressive, supports a wider range of engines, etc. I like the '68fb less because of the trim changes, grille changes, interior changes, etc. '69-'70 are nice cars too but they're getting bigger than pony cars should be.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 27, 2002
#12
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #12
I voted 71-73, but anything with a fastback rocks!
Dave
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Sep 27, 2002
#13
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #13
Well thats pretty interesting. The poll results so far are about where you'd figure them to be. Based on overall popularity, and sales for that matter.

I'd have to say I like them in that order too.

65-66 favorite
67-68 next
69-70 a bit less
71-73 last
 

gingerbreadman

Only half-baked
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
5,358
0
0
Go ahead, call me cheaky
Sep 27, 2002
#14
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #14
always like 67/68

i'm undecided about coupe or fastback tho........used to be on the coupe side but latly the fastbacks have struk my fancy.........


and then its the 65/66 fastbacks......
and i guess the 69/70 should get a mention
Its the nose and taillights on the 71-73 i dont care for not the general over all size...
-gbm-
 

daywalker

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2002
725
0
0
Ladson, SC
Sep 27, 2002
#15
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #15
71' - '73 Mach 1's baybee. Then 69-70's.
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Sep 27, 2002
#16
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #16
I think the board actually speaks for itself where as very few of us don't actually own our favorite already, so the poll is not too surprising. My picks are:

69 Favorite
67 Next
65 A bit less (that one was for you Blake )
71's and up last

I think more importantly though is the why's not the what's. I like all the classic Stangs and wouldn't kick any of 'em outta tyhe garage for eatibng crackers, but I like the original model years on just about all as opposed to it's next year modified counterpart, ie: 67's more than 68's etc, and here's the why's for my choices.

69's because of so many specifics for that year like last GT first Mach 1 only quad headlamp setup first true muscle car year etc. The list could go on for ever.
67's because they are just too cool looking, first year with big block engines, Shelby's influence at it's best and a beautiful interior when done in Aluminum.
65's because there just isn't much of a challange in the restoration and with the million or so made, they are everywhere. True they are the icon model that first hit's everyone's brain when you utter the term "Classic Mustang" but I see them more as the entry level man's car and not the Mustang enthusiaists car as much. (Boy, am I gonna catch sh|t for that one)
71's because, well, they are the hardest to restore, they are truly Moosestangs and the farthest departure from a pony car that any car could be and I miss the classic muscle car cues that all got too modernized, like the door latchees and tail lamps, too disco for me plus I've just never been able to get that image of Mary Tyler Moore cruising around in one outta my head, definitly not cool.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Sep 27, 2002
#17
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #17
Originally posted by Pakrat
I've just never been able to get that image of Mary Tyler Moore cruising around in one outta my head, definitly not cool.
Click to expand...
Watch Diamonds are Forever a couple times and wash the Mary Tyler Moore thing away. A nice Mach 1 and a young Jill St. John... {drool x2}
Dave
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Sep 27, 2002
#18
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #18
Originally posted by Pakrat
I see them more as the entry level man's car and not the Mustang enthusiaists car as much.
Click to expand...

I kill you!




 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Sep 27, 2002
#19
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #19
 

66ColoCoupe

New Member
Jun 20, 2002
23
0
0
Leadville, CO
Sep 27, 2002
#20
  • Sep 27, 2002
  • #20
Of course I had to vote for the 1st gen. But it is an unfair question. I would love to have the 66 interior in a 67 fastback. They just never put all the different things that I like into a single model.
My ranking is:

1. 66 Fastback
2. 67 Shelby
3. 69 Mach 1
4. 67 Fastback GT
5. 66 Coupe ( Of which I have!)
6. 64 1/2 Convertable
7. 68 Shelby convertable
8. 70 Mach 1
9. All other 64 1/2 to 70 Fastbacks
10. All other 64 1/2 to 70 Coupes
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Classic Car Insurance
  • Willybill32
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
83
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
7-UP BILL
R
Front suspension upgrade going on one of our 64/5-68 Mustangs
  • Restomotive
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
133
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2026
Restomotive
R
P
New here
  • PortCity
  • Jun 9, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
97
The Welcome Wagon Jun 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
81
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
W
Excited to Join the Mustang Community
  • Word24
  • Sep 9, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
375
The Welcome Wagon Dec 30, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?