• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Which Rack & Pinion????

  • Thread starter Thread starter nonosstang
  • Start date Start date Jun 18, 2004

Which R&P?

  • TCP

    Votes: 4 44.4%
  • Flaming River

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 5 55.6%

  • Total voters
    9
  • Poll closed Jun 25, 2004.

nonosstang

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2001
142
0
0
Newark, CA
Jun 18, 2004
#1
  • Jun 18, 2004
  • #1
Which R&P would you choose?

Also, if anyone is using any of these, any feedback would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
6

68 & 00 GT

New Member
May 14, 2003
2,407
1
0
HOUSTON TEXAS
Jun 18, 2004
#2
  • Jun 18, 2004
  • #2
Randalls Rack is probably the best option
do a search here also
 

65 fastback

Founding Member
Mar 17, 2002
1,347
0
37
Northern VA
Jun 18, 2004
#3
  • Jun 18, 2004
  • #3
I have the TCP manual Rack & Pinion and if I were to do it over, I would rebuild the stock system. I have posted my thoughts on this before, so I just copied and pasted the information below.

First off I'm not trying to bash TCP. I have many of their products on my car and feel that they are all top quality and very well engineered for our cars. I just feel that the rack and pinion is not that drastic of an improvement to warrent the $$. The TCP system is a very quality piece and the steering is very precise. But the steering effort is very high, especially at low speeds and your turning radius is increased. I had no idea that the TCP R&P system increased my turning radius until I tried to park.

The biggest problem with the steering on our cars is a 30+ year old steering box, but now that you can get a new steering box with a needle bearing design, I don't see the need to convert to R&P.

If I were to do it all over again, I would go with the Flaming River box - http://www.flaming-river.com/ . The Flaming River steering box will decrease the steering effort and provide slop free steering and the 16:1 ratio is a quicker ratio then the stock steering box.

You can get the Shelby idler and pitman arms which increase the responsiveness of the steering (but also increase steering effort). Cobra Automotive - http://cobraautomotive.com/ - has them with pressed in bearings which should help to reduce steering effort.

And in the current Mustangs and Fords magazine, in the new products section, someone is advertising tie rod ends with a hemispherical bearings. When I get home, I'll check the add and see if there's a link.

All in all I believe this would provide an early model Mustang with a very responsive, slop free steering at a reduced steering effort while maintaining the turning radius.

Just my $.02, speaking from experience.

Tim
 

Track Rat

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
27
0
0
Northridge, CA
Jun 18, 2004
#4
  • Jun 18, 2004
  • #4
This poll mentions TCP and Flaming River. What other brands are out their for a 66? Flaming River doesn't make one for the 66 unless you have a Mustang II front setup. Im in the process of swaping mine out so any passed on experience would be helpfull.
 
6

65straightsick

New Member
Jun 4, 2004
411
0
0
Montgomery, AL
Jun 18, 2004
#5
  • Jun 18, 2004
  • #5
I want power steering on my car but i don't really care for the prices on R&P sets. What do i need to do to my 200 to put on power steering? Does anybody make an entire kit to converte a 6 cyl M/S to a 6 cyl P/S????Prices???
 

nonosstang

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2001
142
0
0
Newark, CA
Jun 19, 2004
#6
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • #6
Track Rat: Flaming River does make a R&P conversion for a 66. You don't need a MII setup.




I was just trying to get some input on the two setups to help me make a better decision between the two.

I am not looking to keep the original steering and I am not looking for a budget setup. I was just looking for some feedback and opinions on the two.

Thanks.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jun 19, 2004
#7
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • #7
flaming river has major issues, very few people have had any luck at all with them, they don't fit with headers, there are major bumpsteer issues and they apparently didn't do any engineering at all with them, i'd go with randall's rack check it out at www.randallsrack.com thats the rack i'll be using once i get the money saved up
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
79 steering rack problems
  • garyrc
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
106
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
Trick Flow Series R to Box R Upper Intake Road Block
  • Habu135
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
Habu135
Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
41
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
B
Rack and pinion options
  • Bronco Bart
  • Sep 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
513
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
AeroCoupe
B
Take a look at my rack!
  • bicknell
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
595
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
Willybill32
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?