• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Why Don't People Question This?

  • Thread starter Thread starter final5-0
  • Start date Start date Jul 20, 2008

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 20, 2008
#1
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #1
I found some time to cruise the various Stang boards this afternoon

I was happy to see many threads with dyno results

I did find it interesting to see very few people asked about

Was it a DynoJet or Mustang Dyno

Was the pull done with a Standard or SAE Calibration

It seemed like whatever numbers were stated
or
Whatever kind of sheet was posted

People were throwing them all in the same category

as if they'd all be on an apples to apples comparison

Anybody besides me ever notice that

Grady
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Jul 20, 2008
#2
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #2
i do, and i dont think many people are aware of the significant differences there can be in certain dyno's and certain corrections...



Perfect example, I just had my bike dyno tuned on a factory pro tunning dyno....for anyone that no there modo is "TRUE horsepower" they call it that becase they dont have 5 correction factors like the dyno jets..the dyno jets read much higher that your actualy putting out...the tuner said to get the numbers i would have seen on the dyno jet i would have to multiply it by 1.15.. Factory Pro: Producers of the EC997 Low Inertia Eddy Current Dynamometer Series and Quality MC performance products read theres very good stuff in here

go to the true horsepower scale!!!
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 20, 2008
#3
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #3
Go to the track and street IMHO.

A dyno is nice to compare mods, A/F changes, and get a baseline to see were you stand. But who cares if you got a sheet that says 500hp and you can only run 13's...the real world is the street/strip.

I say street not for racing but drivability. It just takes longer/more people to deal with on the street or at the track than just your car on a dyno and those running it.

That said the dyno is a great tool but I think people get too "into" the numbers.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 20, 2008
#4
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #4
I certainly do see what you are saying here

One problem I got with using 1/4 mile results is .............
Driver skill ... or lack of it ... has SO MUCH to do with the outcome

Another problem with going to the track is ........

How well the car is setup to be effective at laying down a respectable
sixty foot which we all know is a MUST for the most efficient et

Neither of those issues come into play when you dyno

Of course ... dyno results are not without their draw backs as well

There are those shops who purposely do things to inflate results

Peeps can do tricks such as do their pull with no Serp Belt and
conveniently forget to say so which will elevate their results

anyway ........

I have an opinion DynoJet pulls with SAE calibration are a way to
keep different locations, weather, altitude, etc on a fairly even
basis to compare combos.

I have noticed fewer and fewer dyno pulls are done these days
under those conditions and I guess I can understand as the
Standard method of calibration seems to usually produce
results higher than SAE.

I welcome any thoughts or discussion or reasons why I might
be out there in left field on this subject

I just thought it might be interesting to share what I've noticed
and hoped to spark a discussion from my fellow SN friends

I certainly don't have all the knowledge about this subject

I've always found it interesting to compare the various combos
one can find on these boards

I usually do focus on those done on a DynoJet and try to make
sure the same calibration is used on both combos when I do
up one of my comparisons.

Almost forgot

Yes ... I too think one can get caught up in ... Just The Numbers

I do focus on the SHAPE of the hp & tq curves W A Y more than
just the peak numbers

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 20, 2008
#5
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #5
Thanks for posting Grady. Yo uand I agree and disagree on some things and thats ok. But I think you are right. Plus you have shops that inflate numbers I am sure. One shop that doesnt do that is SGS lol. I like the fact that they are telling me how it is. My car was not putting out a lot of power and they didnt hide it.

I dont understand the diff between sae and std but I can do a search on it. I am sure theres also lots of peeps that do stupid tricks. BUT for example in my cobra thread. Mike said something about a cobra that put out X rwhp. When I factored that the car weighs (or should weigh) roughly 3700# I can estimate that his dyno numbers were prolly correct becuase the guys times were .5 tenths slower than they would be in my car being 94/95 is much lighter.

SO my point is the only way you can really trust a dyno result is if you know:

1. The shop.
2. Calibration used.
3. The QM result including the driver skill and gearset.

Even then its a bit of a crapshoot but closer.. All these dyno numbers randomly posted....I call BS. We prolly should pay little attention or add a disclosure..+ or MINUS 50 rwhp, lol.
 

The O.G.

Member
May 28, 2007
145
0
16
witch city,mass
Jul 20, 2008
#6
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #6
there should be one standard imo


guessing what a car would do in a cold/hot ,high and low elavations etc?
correction factor ?i ..ts still a guess but it is a bit fair

i have wondered how cars were dynoed with an auto compared to a stick?
my 5spd is done in fourth gear..when do the autos get floored?
which is more consitent with each other?


anyone do their own driving while on the dyno?

dynometers are expensive $
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 20, 2008
#7
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #7
Autos get dynoed in the 1:1 gear as well...a non O/D auto like a th350/th400 and a C4 would be the 3rd gear. An AOD/7r40 would be the 3rd gear as well but with O/D turned off to keep the car from going into that gear.

If you know the 2nd/3rd gear ratio's you "can" recalibrate the dyno for those gears to keep wheel speed down...it would be easier to just do the 1:1 as so many cars have so many diff. gearsets.
 
T

tstang21

Member
Apr 14, 2008
219
0
16
Jul 20, 2008
#8
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #8
i totally agree on what you are basically saying. when its comes to dynos, people get to much into the numbers. ive plenty of cars making 500rwhp, but on the street/strip, they get blown out by cars making 250rwhp lets say. its comes to tuning and driver skill. to me, numbers dont mean nothing. its in the SOTP feel and how the car drives :Track:
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Jul 21, 2008
#9
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #9
I totally agree with Grady. The first thing I look for is "correction factor." Then there is also "smoothing."

In terms of the actual dyno... I think unless its an engine dyno, you don't have an accurate picture of what the motor can do. Chassis dynos, in my opinion, are useful for tuning but not so much for determining the actual output of the engine. Or how fast the car will go.

Adam
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 21, 2008
#10
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #10
tstang21 said:
i totally agree on what you are basically saying. when its comes to dynos, people get to much into the numbers.
Click to expand...

Yes ... Yes ... Yes ...

We have a winner ... Give this man a Chicken Dinner

ive plenty of cars making 500rwhp, but on the street/strip, they get blown out by cars making 250rwhp lets say. its comes to tuning and driver skill.
Click to expand...

A certain percentage of this kinda thing is always gonna be present when
you compare different cars.

High HP STREET CARS usually aren't setup all that great to do the 1320 thing

Its easy to see why a car with CONSIDERABLY LESS HP and can hook
good enough to sixty foot reasonably well could make one look bad


to me, numbers dont mean nothing. its in the SOTP feel and how the car drives :Track:
Click to expand...

You are so right when it comes to most cars that are driven on the street

Its all about the shape of the curves :Word:

How quick the tq curve jumps up
and
How long before it starts to drop

Grady
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Jul 22, 2008
#11
  • Jul 22, 2008
  • #11
Butt dyno is king in my book.
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Jul 22, 2008
#12
  • Jul 22, 2008
  • #12
Everyone loves numbers!! but not enough people know enough about these dyno's to know that there is more than one correction factor and that dyno's are not all the same.
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Jul 22, 2008
#13
  • Jul 22, 2008
  • #13
Easy answer Grady....

I don't question them, because I don't care about them. I know the system is flawed. Give me track numbers any day. Sure they throw in driver ability, but you know what. At the end of the day, if I were to pull up next to them on a deserted road. Driver ability is VERY important. :wink:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A Night In Denver
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jul 14, 2013
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 23, 2013
CarMichael Angelo
It's Stupid Story Time again!
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2011
CarMichael Angelo
The Night of the Hurricane (a really long stupid story)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 26, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2011
VibrantRedGT
LS1 Dyno Request
  • final5-0
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2007
5spd GT
NA 418, 347, 5.0, & Blown 5.0 Dyno Pull Compare-O
  • final5-0
  • Aug 2, 2008
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 6, 2008
S351Saleen77
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?