• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

World Class T-5 vs. Cobra Tranny

  • Thread starter Thread starter Black Sun 5.0
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2006

Black Sun 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2002
1,337
0
36
L.I., N.Y.
Dec 11, 2006
#1
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #1
I have the option to install either a World Class T-5 or for $50 more install a Cobra tranny. What's the difference between these two tranny's?
 

Black Sun 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2002
1,337
0
36
L.I., N.Y.
Dec 11, 2006
#2
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #2
No takers?
 

JChalfan

Member
Nov 27, 2002
551
0
16
Bellevue, WA
Dec 11, 2006
#3
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #3
Black Sun,

I'm no expert, and it's been a while since I looked into the difference. From what I remember, the Cobra trans has some heaver-duty internals, and is rated to handle about 330lb/ft of torque, compared to 305 for a WC.

I know someone here knows for sure though. You could also try searching, I know I've seen this issue come up in the past.

Jeff
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Dec 11, 2006
#4
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #4
If I rememeber correctly, the cobra has a captured bearing between the input and output shafts besides the shafts to match. It essentially increases the torque capasity to 330 instead of the WC 300. Other than that I think it's pretty much the same tranny. For 50 bucks more I would go for the cobra tranny if that is the difference.
Kevin
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,252
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Dec 11, 2006
#5
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #5
The Cobra T-05 is not 330 ft-lbs...it's only 310 ft-lbs rated. The 330 ft-lbs is the Z-spec T-5 which is not the same as the Cobra T-5.

The difference is a revised pocket bearing that reduces flex allowing you 10 more ft-lbs over the standard 300 ft-lbs of a 90-93 spec world class t-5.

The 85-89 WC T-5 was rated at 265 ft-lbs. So ask what version of the WC they are selling you.

If it's the 300 ft-lb version, not much of a diff for $50

If it's the 265....i would go for it
 

JChalfan

Member
Nov 27, 2002
551
0
16
Bellevue, WA
Dec 11, 2006
#6
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #6
Mustang5L5 said:
The 85-89 WC T-5 was rated at 265 ft-lbs. So ask what version of the WC they are selling you.
Click to expand...

I googled that, and most of what I found said the same thing, that before '90 they were rated at 265 lb-ft.

It still seems really weird to me that Ford would put a transmission rated for a max 265lb-ft of torque behind an engine that makes 300lb-ft of torque in stock form. It seems like it would be asking for major warranty issues...

Jeff
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Dec 11, 2006
#7
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #7
Jeff, if you're familiar with Tip-in Retard that came about on the 94-95 GT's (in both autos and T5's), you'll see your logic was not unnoticed.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,252
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Dec 11, 2006
#8
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #8
JChalfan said:
I googled that, and most of what I found said the same thing, that before '90 they were rated at 265 lb-ft.

It still seems really weird to me that Ford would put a transmission rated for a max 265lb-ft of torque behind an engine that makes 300lb-ft of torque in stock form. It seems like it would be asking for major warranty issues...

Jeff
Click to expand...

I've often wondered why Ford did that as well.


 

JChalfan

Member
Nov 27, 2002
551
0
16
Bellevue, WA
Dec 11, 2006
#9
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #9
HISSIN50 said:
Jeff, if you're familiar with Tip-in Retard that came about on the 94-95 GT's (in both autos and T5's), you'll see your logic was not unnoticed.
Click to expand...

Ah yes, I see your point...

Jeff
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,089
2,695
224
Vass, NC
Dec 12, 2006
#10
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #10
Mustang5L5 said:
The Cobra T-05 is not 330 ft-lbs...it's only 310 ft-lbs rated. The 330 ft-lbs is the Z-spec T-5 which is not the same as the Cobra T-5.
Click to expand...

So, you're saying the T5-Z was never used in a Cobra from the factory?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,252
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Dec 12, 2006
#11
  • Dec 12, 2006
  • #11
FastDriver said:
So, you're saying the T5-Z was never used in a Cobra from the factory?
Click to expand...




That is correct. The 2.95 1st T-5 Z-spec T-5 never came in a production vehicle.


The Cobra uses a 3.35 gearset with a revised pocket bearing to give it the extra 10 ft-lbs.

Two different transmissions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
871
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
293
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
D
What's it Worth? 2006 Mustang GT Convertable
  • doc0075579
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
0
Views
219
What is it Worth?!?!? Mar 2, 2026
doc0075579
D
C
Drivetrain T-5 transmission issue
  • Ch3No2
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
373
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2025
2000xp8
J
T-5 trans in a Fiat
  • Jim Shipsky
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
180
Other Auto Tech Oct 18, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?