• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Would you swap in a Cobra motor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 02 Mineral Gray
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
0

01SN8K

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
135
0
0
May 27, 2005
#21
  • May 27, 2005
  • #21
why should he care about a little weight gain? it is offset by the power gains. it wouldnt be much if any weight gain. an all aluminum motor versus one that is iron. the cobra motor would be best. it can breathe better and has a broader rpm and power band than a SOHC.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
May 27, 2005
#22
  • May 27, 2005
  • #22
01SN8K said:
why should he care about a little weight gain? it is offset by the power gains. it wouldnt be much if any weight gain. an all aluminum motor versus one that is iron. the cobra motor would be best. it can breathe better and has a broader rpm and power band than a SOHC.
Click to expand...

There are 2 reasons really (although not specific to Mustangs as this engine combo evidently works in Cobra's, but the physics behind the theory still apply).

1. handling, if there is more weight over the front wheels then the front/rear power distribution is far from ideal. Also if it increases the wieght of the engine higher up it will raise the cars centre of gravity increasing its roll angle.

2. power to weight. How much more power will the DOHC produce over the SOHC, will it outweight the extra weight of the DOHC.

When Jaguar where developing the V12 they tested DOHC setups, they did produce more power than the SOHC designs but not by enough to offset the extra weight. Essentially the NET ('net being the VERY IMPORTANT word here) was not sufficent as there would still be the detrement to handling. Hence the Jaguar V12 is only SOHC design. Although it has proven good enough to produce 629bhp n/a from the stock 5.3 litres capacity in full out race tune.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 27, 2005
#23
  • May 27, 2005
  • #23
300bhp/ton said:
2. How much more power will the DOHC produce over the SOHC?
Click to expand...
Answer: With a blower......much, much more! Besides...the weight gain you'd get by swapping out a DOHC into the place of the SOHC would about equal the weight of a SOHC and a blower anyway. You don't see anyone complaining about handling after adding a blower to their 2V, do you? I don't think the additional weight gain he's going to see with the DOHC swap is going to affect the handling as significantly as you think it will.
 
0

01SN8K

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
135
0
0
May 27, 2005
#24
  • May 27, 2005
  • #24
if there was an affect to handling then ford would not put a DOHC in a mustang. a cobra like mine as tested by SVT pulls .9 g's on a skid pad.if there are issues it is slight and can be fixed with a set of lowering springs. and last time i looked at a stock mustang they were kinda high up stock so regardless of the motor there is already a handling problem. they are not the best for cornering or slalom.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
May 27, 2005
#25
  • May 27, 2005
  • #25
Gearbanger 101 said:
Answer: With a blower......much, much more! Besides...the weight gain you'd get by swapping out a DOHC into the place of the SOHC would about equal the weight of a SOHC and a blower anyway. You don't see anyone complaining about handling after adding a blower to their 2V, do you? I don't think the additional weight gain he's going to see with the DOHC swap is going to affect the handling as significantly as you think it will.
Click to expand...
As I said it was purly theoretical, but it all depends how much power you want, a SOHC 2v will put out 500rwhp, if thats all your after then the extra potential of the DOHC is almost wasted, if your going 700+rwhp then its a different story. Also the charcteristics of the engines will be different, the SOHC should feel more grunty down low but a little breathless up top COMPARED to the DOHC which will be a more revvy motor.

This is the classic case of which tuning approach to go for, in the UK hot hatches are the main stay (had several over the years), in a straight line the 16v revy engines are the quickest, but in the real world out there on the public roads the grunty 8v engines are nearly always the faster cars point to point even though they have less BHP.

Assuming the new 3v engine will handle FI ok it probably will be the best compromise all round, smaller overall dimensions and less weight than the DOHC but able to produce more BHP than the SOHC 2v unit.

01SN8K said:
if there was an affect to handling then ford would not put a DOHC in a mustang. a cobra like mine as tested by SVT pulls .9 g's on a skid pad.if there are issues it is slight and can be fixed with a set of lowering springs. and last time i looked at a stock mustang they were kinda high up stock so regardless of the motor there is already a handling problem. they are not the best for cornering or slalom.
Click to expand...
Skid pad means nothing in real terms as it is about mechanical grip, tyres play the largest part there. Handling is about feel and control as when cornering there is a weight transfer across the vehicle.

When the 03 Cobra was 1st tested it was noted how well it handled, but also that it felt nosie heavy compared to the previous Cobra's, which the SVT engineer explaned was because of the extra weight from the cast iron block.
 

def1eppard

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
889
0
0
DFW, TX
May 27, 2005
#26
  • May 27, 2005
  • #26
Its simple.

Cobra > GT
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
173
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
J
351w swap in 2004 questions (set up like a 95 Cobra)
  • jonathansw1601
  • Mar 24, 2018
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2018
jonathansw1601
J
Forced Induction 97 Cobra Project With Kb 2.6
  • KillerCobra97
  • Dec 18, 2014
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 8, 2015
vertigasen
U
  • Locked
Expired 1988 Fox Notch With A Termi Swap And Tt
  • undfetd
  • Dec 16, 2014
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
6K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 16, 2014
undfetd
U
C
  • Locked
SOLD 1986 Lx Coupe - Coyote Motor, Ccw's, T56, Mm Suspension
  • Coupester
  • Jan 23, 2014
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
10K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jan 23, 2014
Coupester
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?