• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

X vs. H

  • Thread starter Thread starter KidCapri50
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2006
Status
Not open for further replies.

KidCapri50

New Member
Sep 8, 2005
40
0
0
Jan 22, 2006
#1
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #1
I know there is dispute between the x pipe and h pipe, but I personally like the sound of the x. Plus not to mention it work a lot better than an h.

Who here runs an x w/o cats? Any input on performance and sound?
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 22, 2006
#2
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #2
I had an X with cats. It probably would've sounded really good If I had better mufflers to go with it. Now I have an O/R X and different mufflers and love it. as far as power goes, I honestly cant tell you. Im sure I gained something. but an exact number, I dont know.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jan 22, 2006
#3
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #3
x>h>nothing
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Jan 22, 2006
#4
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #4
from what i hear an x gives you more of that nascarish sound. the H will give you the old musle car sound. As far as perfomance, I dont know if one is better than the other. I run an o/r x and love it.
 

KidCapri50

New Member
Sep 8, 2005
40
0
0
Jan 22, 2006
#5
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #5
I was able dig this up.

Is an "X" pipe better than and "H" pipe?
Over the years, Flowmaster's testing of all types of crossovers, including "X pipes", has revealed no substantial benefits over a properly installed "H" pipe on street driven applications. However, in race applications with small cubic inch engines and /or restricted (small bore) carburetors, will respond well to the addition of X pipes, tri-y styled collectors and/or properly designed single exhaust systems.
 

STNG_96

Member
Sep 15, 2004
120
0
16
Marion, Illinois
Jan 22, 2006
#6
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #6
I have an o/r X, and my buddy has an o/r H, and we both have magnapacks. As far as we can tell, sound is about the only noticeable difference between the two. As someone already said, my X sounds a bit more raspy than his, but in my opinion, his sometimes is borderline truck sounding. I really like the sound of my setup.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Jan 22, 2006
#7
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #7
dude, do a search. you'll find about 500 threads about this same topic
 

poorcollegekid

Member
Mar 31, 2005
74
0
6
Mount Carmel, IL
Jan 22, 2006
#8
  • Jan 22, 2006
  • #8
someone did a dyno test on this once. i wish i could find it. but here is what it said from what i remember. up to 5200 the H pipe made more power than the X and after 5200, only like 4 horse difference. but the midrange was far better with the H. and the torque was higher with the H. i personally like the american muscle sound but to each his own.
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Jan 23, 2006
#9
  • Jan 23, 2006
  • #9
ahhh good'ol "X or H" debate...
for what we use our car for, X or H makes very little difference. Its purely sound deffirence. If you like sound of X, go with X. I like traditional muscle car sound, hense the H
 

Enter Username

Member
Oct 7, 2003
65
0
6
Jan 23, 2006
#10
  • Jan 23, 2006
  • #10
KidCapri50 said:
I know there is dispute between the x pipe and h pipe, but I personally like the sound of the x.
Click to expand...

No you don't. You just think you do. Trust me.
 

97GTAP

New Member
Jul 31, 2005
85
0
0
Seattle
Jan 23, 2006
#11
  • Jan 23, 2006
  • #11
Enter Username said:
No you don't. You just think you do. Trust me.
Click to expand...

I agree...
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Jan 23, 2006
#12
  • Jan 23, 2006
  • #12
Is a prochamber considered an H...or is it in a class of its own?
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Jan 23, 2006
#13
  • Jan 23, 2006
  • #13
Sorry, but there is a glut of these threads.
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=607174

I'm not locking this to be a jerk. I just think it's important to keep the content in one place, to maximize exposure to good advice. The thread URL above is in our Tech sticky at the top of this subforum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

F
H-PIPE WIDTH
  • forango
  • May 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
265
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 28, 2025
LILCBRA
Mufflers for stock 5.0
  • MrPerfect2
  • Dec 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
214
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 12, 2025
Mustang5L5
Fox BBK X-pipe replacement Cat?
  • TIGGER
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
263
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
L
Exhaust 95 gt pypes catted x pipe
  • Lx5.0fiend
  • Aug 22, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
282
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 18, 2025
revhead347
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
243
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?