• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

03 cobra Upgrade pullie?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 01MustangMan
  • Start date Start date Nov 2, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

01MustangMan

Founding Member
Dec 9, 2001
734
0
0
Fort Myers, Florida
Nov 9, 2003
#21
  • Nov 9, 2003
  • #21
Thanks for the info guys, I appreciate it... I was told by southfloridapulleyhq.com that if I got the 3.1 pullie I wont need a tune and I dont need the plugs. But Do you think its worth it to only get the 3.1, I originally wanted the 2.9.... How much extra Hp will I get for an aditional 3-4 PSI?
 
H

hoofbear

Founding Member
Apr 16, 2002
82
0
6
nothern in.
Nov 9, 2003
#22
  • Nov 9, 2003
  • #22
01MustangMan said:
Thanks for the info guys, I appreciate it... I was told by southfloridapulleyhq.com that if I got the 3.1 pullie I wont need a tune and I dont need the plugs. But Do you think its worth it to only get the 3.1, I originally wanted the 2.9.... How much extra Hp will I get for an aditional 3-4 PSI?
Click to expand...
It,s a little hard to figure out what you already have done to your car to little info. here,s a start straight thru cai,PHP steeda , major name catback i.e magnaflow ,steeda, borla(stinger) 2.93 pulley and a predator tuner. You don,t need a chip with a predator can do your on tune. Also with a 2.93 you may not need a new belt.
 
S

Steel City

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
46
0
0
Nov 9, 2003
#23
  • Nov 9, 2003
  • #23
01MustangMan said:
Thanks for the info guys, I appreciate it... I was told by southfloridapulleyhq.com that if I got the 3.1 pullie I wont need a tune and I dont need the plugs. But Do you think its worth it to only get the 3.1, I originally wanted the 2.9.... How much extra Hp will I get for an aditional 3-4 PSI?
Click to expand...

You probably can get away without a tune with just a 3.1 but why change the pulley for just a 3.1 and why chance it???? Get a 2.90 or 2.93, great bump in power. Stay away from the predator unless that is your only option. Im not saying the predator is bad but it is not near perfect. You seem to be a little on the concervative side and if you have concerns just get a real tune. As far as the ngk's being an issue I have never heard that one before except in incorrect applications, they are 1 step colder than the factory plugs. 3-4 psi is a very noticeable jump in power when tuned properly.
 
O

Orange04Cobra

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
42
0
0
Feb 19, 2004
#24
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #24
Steel City said:
You probably can get away without a tune with just a 3.1 but why change the pulley for just a 3.1 and why chance it???? Get a 2.90 or 2.93, great bump in power. Stay away from the predator unless that is your only option. Im not saying the predator is bad but it is not near perfect. You seem to be a little on the concervative side and if you have concerns just get a real tune. As far as the ngk's being an issue I have never heard that one before except in incorrect applications, they are 1 step colder than the factory plugs. 3-4 psi is a very noticeable jump in power when tuned properly.
Click to expand...
I have to agree here..
we currently run tr6 in every stang in our garage.
the densos will blow out UNLESS you upgrade your ignition.
They have a hotter spark, but not a BiGGER spark, they blow out easire than the stock plugs.{with a pulley increase}
Densos blew out on our lightning as well above 15 psi.
The tr6s are the perfrct plug for moderate boost.
they actually make a tr"9" {call ngk} if you are running REALLY HIGH BOOST, but warm ups take a while before you idle right.
On our 1996 Cobra:
stage 3 cams, 20 over, 8.5to1 comp,55lph inj,accel gen7,ati ps1c-r,no imrc,full port work.{498 @ the tire with only 8 lbs of boost}
When we were tuning, and went to 14 psi, we had densos in it, we thought something was wrong with the gen 7, turned out to just be the plugs.
TR6 are the 'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me'nit.
MAbye u.m. had a problem with them becasue of plug length, some are 1" and some are .5", a shorter plug might have given him a problem...
Dont know for sure.
Tr6's are in all my cars though..
lin
 

95GTS

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2000
864
0
16
Corpus Christi, Texas
Feb 19, 2004
#25
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #25
I run the 2.93 pulley from SFPHQ and I'm probably one of the few running no chip or Predator tune as well. I do use the Afterburner eFPC though since it allows me to fine tune my air-fuel in 400rpm increments. The biggest issue with this set-up is it cost the same amount of a chip but doesn't deliver the performance in torque that a chip or Predator would since you can't alter the timing curves (other stuff as well I suppose). Actually, it doesn't really increase hp/tq that much, if at all, but allows you tune run a relative safe air-fuel with the smaller pulley's. The torque in my dyno numbers is much less than those with similar mods and a chip. HP is about the same, give or take.

I also run the TR6's gapped at .030 without issue. I've used Denso's in my past supercharged mustang and really liked those as well.
 

Vic_Ferrari

New Member
Sep 25, 2003
273
1
0
lake mary, FL
Feb 20, 2004
#26
  • Feb 20, 2004
  • #26
The 2.8 does not overspin the blower.

You need a new belt and need to replace the stock 90 MM idlers with 100MM units.
JDM has the best kit available.
732-780-0770
Tell them you want the setup on "Jim from Superchips" car...
It kicks butt and no belt slip.
 
U

Uncle Meat

Banned
Jun 13, 2002
0
1
0
Prattville, Alabama
Feb 20, 2004
#27
  • Feb 20, 2004
  • #27
Vic_Ferrari said:
The 2.8 does not overspin the blower.

You need a new belt and need to replace the stock 90 MM idlers with 100MM units.
JDM has the best kit available.
732-780-0770
Tell them you want the setup on "Jim from Superchips" car...
It kicks butt and no belt slip.
Click to expand...
Vic - Can you provide me with something from Eaton that backs up your claim that a 2.80 is not over spinning the M112? I don't want to get in a pissing match over this, but Eaton's website shows the maximum RPM at 14000 on the chart they have posted. A Cobra with a 2.93 inch pulley spins the Eaton to 16915 RPM when the engine is at 6500. The 2.8 pulley would raise this to a little over 17000 RPM's!

The Lightning guys have been over-spinning the Eaton for a while now with a pretty low failure rate so we know the unit is tough to say the least. I'm just wondering what Eaton says the maximum is?

U.M.
 

Vic_Ferrari

New Member
Sep 25, 2003
273
1
0
lake mary, FL
Feb 20, 2004
#28
  • Feb 20, 2004
  • #28
I believe you are correct in the numbers eaton claims is "safe".

KNOCK ON WOOD.....
I've never seen a failure on a 2.8

Hell, I know a guy who had a 2.7 upper, a 6 LB (steering wheel=o) lower, raced it incessantly and never had a failure. Calculate THAT RPM....LOL! This is a bit silly, but the Eaton is a strong piece.

2.8 is pretty responsible.
Those I know who have 2.93's with they had just bought the 2.8
What's an Eaton cost anyway? Dime a dozen? The risk is so low and the cost is so low I'm not even remotely worried about it.
 

Miklowcic

Active Member
Apr 24, 2001
2,432
0
47
Hillsborough, NJ
Feb 21, 2004
#29
  • Feb 21, 2004
  • #29
...

nothing but 2.80 pulley and superchip and of course a smaller belt...

well ok I have my silencer removed and a K+N Drop in.....
pro 5.0 shifter, drag radials, sub connectors and lin locs....


I have had this set up for about 6000 miles....mostly racing or driving to and from the track and have had no problems at all.

The info I was given by my mechanic who claimed to have talked to a ford or Eaton....responsible for the supercharger was that it is safe....going more than 2.80 is pointless because it wont get you more boost...or it will drop off or your belt will just slip like crazy...

seems to be true because the people I have seen at the track with all sorts of mods and upper and lower pulleys and idlers (running some ridiculous boost or so they think) and 10 or so other mods are running my time or slower......

Only people have seen go CONSIDERABLY faster is JDMs car and some guy who was at etown end of the season with a black 03 stripped to down...auto trans, solid rear and the works....... he only ran 11.1 but definetely had a 10 sec car. I think Crazyhorses car is running low 11s too now and I think Chris has almost the same mods he did on my car... not sure what else he has been testing on it though....
 

Vic_Ferrari

New Member
Sep 25, 2003
273
1
0
lake mary, FL
Feb 22, 2004
#30
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #30
There are also a lot of mis-tuned cars out there.
You are one of those with a good tune and so is JDM.

An upper lower combo works well at the track with a ported blower, headers, etc....
You'll see a boost drop after porting and instaling headers but the volume (mass) of air coming in will be larger.This setup can be realy fast. Don't forget your heat exchanger!

I just think if I was gonna go for that much boost I'd go KB or Whipple.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
274
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
B
Screamin Demons Worth It N/A?
  • Blackout67
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
252
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
Noobz347
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
112
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
283
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
S
S302 Saleen supercharger help
  • sschoup
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
2
Views
300
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Nov 19, 2025
sschoup
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?