• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

03 Mach 1 versus 07 Mustang GT: Drag Racing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Five Oh Brian
  • Start date Start date Oct 17, 2007

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
Oct 17, 2007
#1
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #1
I've been thoroughly dissecting my 1/4 mile timeslips from my 03 Mach 1 (manual trans) versus my 07 GT Coupe (auto trans) to see how close I'm getting the 07 to the Mach 1's performance. I'm just thinking out loud, so here are my observations...

The cars are very evenly modded. The Mach 1 requires 91 octane gas from the factory and I've retuned the GT for premium gas via my Predator Tuner. The Mach 1 is a manual trans, but I added a 3,800 rpm stall converter to the GT's automatic so that it launches like a stick shift car. The Mach 1 has 4.30 gears while the GT has 4.10 gears (bigger overdrive and higher redline in the Mach 1 allowed a little more gear). That's it. No other mods to either car other than BFG 275/40/17 drag radials. Race weight for each car with me in it: Mach 1 = 3,550 lbs, GT = 3,620 lbs.

While looking over timeslips (50+ for the Mach 1 and about 30 for the 07 GT), I threw out the slips where I made an obvious mistake (missed shift, blazed the tires) or the weather was outrageous (90+ degree & high humidity). Then I grabbed the ten best timeslips for each car and averaged those out instead of just looking at the ultimate best for each car. That allowed me to concentrate on repeatable numbers that can be meaningfully compared.

It's amazing how close the two cars are in a short race, but then the 4V heads on the Mach 1 start to shine at higher speeds (duh!). Here is the average for the ten best timeslips for each car.

R/T: 0.116 (M1), 0.092 (GT)
60 foot ET: 1.86 (M1), 1.88 (GT)
330 foot ET: 5.44 (M1), 5.51 (GT)

1/8 mi ET: 8.42 (M1), 8.55 (GT)
1/8 mi MPH: 82.66 (M1), 81.22 (GT)

1000 foot ET: 10.97 (M1), 11.17 (GT)

1/4 mi ET: 13.14 (M1), 13.39 (GT)
1/4 mi MPH: 104.2 (M1), 101.7 (GT)

As much as I miss my Mach 1 (sold it to a buddy when I bought the 07), at least the 07 is almost where I left off with the Mach 1. A couple more easy mods, or drop some weight out of the car, and it'll be there.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 17, 2007
#2
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #2
Nice comparo! Now the Mach had 300 HP stock, how much TQ? I can also see that the 4V head would carry more steam at the upper end over the 3V. Did you do any weight reduction in the Mach or was it minor such as spare/jack removal only? I know with mine after 195 lbs removed I gained .236 secs & 1.9 MPH and that was with very little to no traction for the first 330'. Had stickies been on there I imagine I could have come close to .4 secs reduction or more. I know my MPH might have stayed the same or dropped due to tire spin. There is alot in these autos if you can coax it out right. I know totaly different altitude, weather, track prep and driver skill varies, but my best with weight removal and street radials edged your Mach. If I were you, I'd remove as much weight as possible since you have very good traction and you should see 12s. My best 60' was 1.96 with most of the others in the 2.04-2.07 range so you are beating mine by nearly .2! Good luck and I know I'm looking forward to your tactics and progress
 
K

kkdoughboy

New Member
Jul 20, 2007
212
0
0
Pennsylvania
Oct 17, 2007
#3
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #3
Kooldawg, What did you remove from your car to free up 195 lbs?
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
Oct 17, 2007
#4
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #4
kooldawg6 said:
Nice comparo! Now the Mach had 300 HP stock, how much TQ? I can also see that the 4V head would carry more steam at the upper end over the 3V. Did you do any weight reduction in the Mach or was it minor such as spare/jack removal only?
Click to expand...

The Mach 1 was rated at 305hp, and 330 lb ft torque. Real world dyno'ing by many of the guys at www.Mach1Registry.com showed those to be conservative numbers, with most seeing bone stock Mach 1's at about 320-325hp and 350-360 lb ft torque.

The only things I removed for weight reduction in either car was the jack, spare, and rear seat bottom. 1/4 tank gas maximum. That's how I got to the weights I posted.
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Oct 17, 2007
#5
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #5
kkdoughboy said:
Kooldawg, What did you remove from your car to free up 195 lbs?
Click to expand...

The Driver....
 

gashog

Member
Dec 26, 2006
139
0
16
Fresno, CA
Oct 17, 2007
#6
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #6
kkdoughboy said:
Kooldawg, What did you remove from your car to free up 195 lbs?
Click to expand...

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=720784
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Oct 17, 2007
#7
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #7
Okay Guys someone help me out here with the math and the weight distribution aspects of the S197 for drag purposes. I was under the impression that the ideal distribution for drag is 50/50. So, now I am now totally confused if the stock WD is 53/47 with a stock weight of 3483(ish), we would have a lbs. split of 1845 to the front and 1637 to the back.

Wouldn't we want shave 150+ FROM THE FRONT and redistribute it to the back?
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 17, 2007
#8
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #8
gashog said:
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=720784
Click to expand...

Thanks gashog For those who are wondering where I came up with 195 and this post only shows 183. I removed 3 of the 4 heavy duty rubber floormats the next day which weighed another whopping 12 lbs
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 17, 2007
#9
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #9
Jenns01TA said:
Okay Guys someone help me out here with the math and the weight distribution aspects of the S197 for drag purposes. I was under the impression that the ideal distribution for drag is 50/50. So, now I am now totally confused if the stock WD is 53/47 with a stock weight of 3483(ish), we would have a lbs. split of 1845 to the front and 1637 to the back.

Wouldn't we want shave 150+ FROM THE FRONT and redistribute it to the back?
Click to expand...

Well duh, but that is like so not free and way to involved.


Of course I did not overlook OR forget about this comment...
Jenns01TA
Quote:
Originally Posted by kkdoughboy
Kooldawg, What did you remove from your car to free up 195 lbs?

The Driver....
Click to expand...
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Oct 17, 2007
#10
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #10
kooldawg6 said:
Well duh, but that is like so not free and way to involved.


Of course I did not overlook OR forget about this comment...

Click to expand...



Yeah - Yeah now tell me "Shut your pie hole woman!"....
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 17, 2007
#11
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #11
Jenns01TA said:


Yeah - Yeah now tell me "Shut your pie hole woman!"....
Click to expand...

:OT: ...and ruin the enjoyment and laughter you send my way????? It will take more than that to have that comment sent to you
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Oct 17, 2007
#12
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #12
Dawg

Now I am sure the original poster would appreciate if we go back to topic....

...............................Continue on Gentlemen.........................
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale 1994 GT 5L Trickflow h/c/i Tremec TR3550 Saleen copy - $7000 (Ann Arbor, MI)
  • no_fox_given
  • Mar 21, 2019
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
3
Views
9K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 21, 2019
no_fox_given
M
Expired Hellion Twin Turbo 2016 Mustang Gt Premium
  • malex94
  • Jan 25, 2018
  • S550 Mustangs for Sale (2015+)
Replies
2
Views
5K
S550 Mustangs for Sale (2015+) Jan 25, 2018
malex94
M
Help To Drag Race My Mustang
  • ked263
  • Nov 4, 2013
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2013
ked263
M
  • Locked
Expired ***Fully Built 2003 Mach 1 Ford Mustang***Must See*** - $19500 Charlotte NC
  • Modularstang
  • Apr 19, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
13K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 15, 2013
Modularstang
M
  • Locked
SOLD 1989 Turbo Mustang Gt, 700+rwhp Dynoed, 1000+rwhp Ready, Street/strip
  • RyanSG
  • Oct 5, 2013
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
8K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 5, 2013
RyanSG
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?