• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

05 GT vs MACH1 race RESULTS.....thats right...RESULTS!

  • Thread starter Thread starter GNN60GT500
  • Start date Start date Sep 28, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
First Prev 8 of 8
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 7, 2004
#141
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #141
.
 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 7, 2004
#142
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #142
Also, Its quite possible that FORD may have underated the hp on this model.
 

SAYNOTORICE

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
152
0
0
43
Massachusetts
Nov 8, 2004
#143
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #143
everyone who is bashing eachother shut the ***** up and go roast some rice or bowties....jeez we really need a new camaro out there, this is g@y
 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 8, 2004
#144
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #144
351CJ said:
To help fan the flames, I was told by a Ford engineer that the 4.6L - 3V horsepower was limited by the computer, NOT the mechanicals. That would imply that what you said is accurate. "Steeda has been able to pull the crank horsepower up on an 05 GT to 350" Especially since it appears that the stock engines really makes 320 HP or so.

I was also told that Ford had a goal of getting a version of the 4.6L 3V to make 400 HP, normally aspirated, but they could not make the 400 HP # out of 4.6L and make it emissions legal and meet all durability requirements. He would not tell me how much HP they were able to get out of it, but I got the impression that it was well over 350 HP.
Click to expand...

hmmmm ... Does this mean that there is the possibility that there may be a "unofficial" after market chip that will increase the HP ?
 

Motorhead6T5

New Member
Oct 21, 2004
215
0
0
Marysville,CA
Nov 8, 2004
#145
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #145
The mach's have ram air right? Could be why they are trapping higher
 

MineralgreyGT01

New Member
Jun 23, 2002
519
0
0
57
Normal, Illinois
Nov 8, 2004
#146
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #146
Motorhead6T5 said:
The mach's have ram air right? Could be why they are trapping higher
Click to expand...


Nah the shaker is for looks, it does make a dark spot on the filter so something is comming in but since the airbox has 2 holes, no ram air effect. The most likely reason for the higher trap speed is the area under the curve where the 4 valve is more powerfull after the 3 valve starts falling off. In my opinion its all an area under the curve thing. Another thing to wonder about is the three piece drive shaft. I am sure some power is being wasted through the rubber couplings that could help spin the rear.
 

Mach428

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
321
0
0
Nov 8, 2004
#147
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #147
Wow.....This Mach 1 vs 05 Argument has gone way to far. Everyone needs to chill out and be happy WE STILL HAVE A MUSTANG, and its only getting better......
 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 8, 2004
#148
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #148
Mach428 said:
Wow.....This Mach 1 vs 05 Argument has gone way to far. Everyone needs to chill out and be happy WE STILL HAVE A MUSTANG, and its only getting better......
Click to expand...

I agree. We need to save our arguments for the GTO hehehehehe
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
48
not quite here
Nov 8, 2004
#149
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #149
Stang2k5 said:
hmmmm ... Does this mean that there is the possibility that there may be a "unofficial" after market chip that will increase the HP ?
Click to expand...


there already is one. Tim Barth at Modular Powerhouse aka Cobra Killer, tuned a stock 05 to over 300rwhp. the car gained over 20rwhp with just a tune!
 
K

Kellyv602

New Member
Nov 15, 2001
47
0
0
Springfield, MO
Nov 8, 2004
#150
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #150
DBMSTNG said:
there already is one. Tim Barth at Modular Powerhouse aka Cobra Killer, tuned a stock 05 to over 300rwhp. the car gained over 20rwhp with just a tune!
Click to expand...

you got a link? I havent seen anything about it. Just that he thought it would be over 300 rwhp..no that he had actually done it yet
 

302fordracer

New Member
Mar 27, 2004
738
0
0
40
Vancouver, WA
Nov 8, 2004
#151
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #151
351CJ said:
We have already discussed the first dyno #'s on the '05. The '05 is putting out almost the same peak RWHP as the Mach 1. Between 4200 adn 6200 RPM HP and torque are almost idendical. The one missing bit of information is what the '05 GT torqe looks like from 1500 to 4200 RPM. The '05 GT may have more torqe at these RPMs due to its VVT and more sophisticated intake manifold.

HP is meaninless for acceleration. Torque is the only thing that matters.

How do you know that the Mach 1 is much more aerodynamic? Looks can be deceiving. Please post the aerodynamic drag #'s for the Mach 1 and the '05 GT so we can have some facts, not your speculation.
Click to expand...

I'm with you on this one...the reason for the 05 gt rolling with the mach 1 is going to be becuase of the vvt the 05 puts down much better numbers as far as low end horsepower and torque are concerned..this is the very reason why ford is using this valvetrain...the mustang was built for low end torque and the new valvetrain provides it..technology improved and there is no reason why we shouldn't accept it..the new mustang is a better drag racer than our older counterparts...way to go ford
 
I

iviustang50h

New Member
Oct 13, 2004
50
0
0
46
Wisconsin
Nov 8, 2004
#152
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #152
DBMSTNG said:
there already is one. Tim Barth at Modular Powerhouse aka Cobra Killer, tuned a stock 05 to over 300rwhp. the car gained over 20rwhp with just a tune!
Click to expand...


Yeah, I am also curious about this. Did it say what he did? Did he just adjust the timing and take off the airbox? Please post a link!
 
F

Fast GTO

New Member
Oct 23, 2004
46
0
0
Nov 9, 2004
#153
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #153
BSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 9, 2004
#154
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #154
Fast GTO said:
BSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Click to expand...

You GTO and Mach 1 cats are just player hating from the sideline
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
46
Texas
http
Nov 10, 2004
#155
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #155
Stang2k5 said:
You GTO and Mach 1 cats are just player hating from the sideline
Click to expand...
I like the fact that Ford finally is producing a Mustang GT that is truly fast. I'm not a player hater & I'm also not sweating because I'm the type of person that will run anything when I'm in the mood. I've lost & I've won some. No biggie. That's why I have a Mustang. I'm not jealous over the '05. Progress is good. If I race one & I lose then I'll bolt-on some parts. Life's good for Mustang enthusiasts. Life's not good for '05 haters.
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
56
West L.A.
Nov 10, 2004
#156
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #156
I agree with downsouthman. Unfortunately I don't own either one of these beauties but it's still good to know that the new GT is headed in the right direction. I think it should be quicker than the Mach 1, even if not by much. Better than taking a step backwards.
 

Motorhead6T5

New Member
Oct 21, 2004
215
0
0
Marysville,CA
Nov 12, 2004
#157
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #157
Motortrend got a 13.88@101.91,and a 13.80@102.5 with the mach. Looks like they are gonna be damn close to me. I can't wait for my 05 to come mid dec.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
First Prev 8 of 8
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
147
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
384
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
929
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?