• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

05' Mustang 1/4 windows poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweet~Low~93
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2004

05 1/4 windows options --

  • keep Stock

    Votes: 35 35.0%
  • Scoops ' something like old school '

    Votes: 45 45.0%
  • louvers 'the look of 65-65 stangs'

    Votes: 27 27.0%

  • Total voters
    100
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

sweet~Low~93

New Member
Oct 26, 2001
637
0
0
Toledo Ohio
Jan 14, 2004
#1
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #1
Would like to get some good feedback, on
what you guys think of 1/4 windows on new 05 like or dislike

few words or less [like or dislike]


1.> Keep stock ' I like the stock 1/4 windows'

2.> scoops ' something more old school '

3.> Vents ' like the 65-66 stang had'
 
R

Ron Jeremy

New Member
Nov 13, 2003
747
1
0
Hollywood, California...I live next door to Jenna
Jan 14, 2004
#2
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #2
I love them. Now let Ford have a louver option for them.
 

ZStanger

Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
311
0
0
Pity City
Jan 14, 2004
#3
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #3
Scoops or Louvers. The 1/4 Window looks out of place.
 

Desmo Racer

New Member
Jan 14, 2004
5
0
0
Northeast Ohio
Jan 14, 2004
#4
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #4
Scoops. The window appears too plain and disrupts the lines of the sail. The '05 concept has it right.
 

66 BLAKE 96

Native Texican
Founding Member
Feb 16, 2001
4,810
0
0
Cowtown
Jan 14, 2004
#5
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #5
For the record, Louvers are metal or plastic shades that attach to the outside of glass

VENTS are what the 65-68 fastbacks have.
 

TheWolf

New Member
Jan 13, 2003
257
0
0
NC
Jan 14, 2004
#6
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #6
I like the old style scoops but they have to be functional air extracters.
 

(&)

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2002
140
0
0
Kansas
Jan 14, 2004
#7
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #7
I think fake scoops are lame, so unless they scoop the air to somewhere interesting, it's not an option for me. Vents really aren't needed, but they look cool. However, in the end, I'd like as much visibility as possible. I've never driven a Mustang that was easy to see out of and I want as much help as I can get. Plus, I think the window flows well with the rest of the design. What some people call boring I call good clean design. I like how the new Mustang doesn't have any gaudy or non-functional "look at me, I'm sporty" bits. Clean lines and an agressive stance are what makes it for me.
 

RTGreen

Founding Member
Nov 9, 2001
1,866
0
0
Alabaster, Alabama
Jan 14, 2004
#8
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #8
Scoops! The concept scoops looked bad a$$!
 
N

noe

New Member
Sep 13, 2003
137
0
0
Jan 14, 2004
#9
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #9
the window ends too abruptly, i think if it went back further and ended at a point it would accent the vehicle quite well
 
R

Ron Jeremy

New Member
Nov 13, 2003
747
1
0
Hollywood, California...I live next door to Jenna
Jan 14, 2004
#10
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #10
YES. I forgot. I LOVE SCOOPS too. Bring back an option for SCOOPS AND LOUVERS!
 
S

SportscarFan

New Member
Jan 8, 2004
38
0
0
Jan 14, 2004
#11
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #11
noe said:
the window ends too abruptly, i think if it went back further and ended at a point it would accent the vehicle quite well
Click to expand...

As it is, it looks almost exactly like a 66 shelby. same kick-back at the rear edge of the window. There is actually a proper name for that design element, but I can't recall it now. I actually think it is quite clean and slick looking. BMW coupes, sedans, and even some SN95 mustangs have a similar shape on the trailing edge of the quarter windows.

If the quarter windows came to a point, it would look too much like a generic car, a current cavalier coupe, to be precise. And it would not look like any mustang other than a 79-93 hardtop/hatch, and there are not really any other cues from that era on the car. I think that would be a mistake.

I don't think "extractor vents" would look as cool. There aren't any other "vents" or "scoops" on the car, fake or otherwise. It isn't a pontiac, after all.
And visibility would be an issue, as those sail panels are relatively big. I think my wife's miata is hard to see out of to the rear quarters, and the rear window is right behind my head.

Scoops are kind of ubiquitous anymore, like rice burner having a roof-scoop. God, Why? is it mid engine? think not. is it a racecar without heating or cooling? Not. Ram air is one thing, but most of that goes overboard rather quickly.

I like the "walk quietly and carry a big stick" philosophy. Probably the reason that I like a tasteful approach, almost a sleeper, with excellent power, handling, and brakes.
 

TheWolf

New Member
Jan 13, 2003
257
0
0
NC
Jan 14, 2004
#12
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #12
SportscarFan said:
I don't think "extractor vents" would look as cool. There aren't any other "vents" or "scoops" on the car, fake or otherwise. It isn't a pontiac, after all.
And visibility would be an issue, as those sail panels are relatively big. I think my wife's miata is hard to see out of to the rear quarters, and the rear window is right behind my head.
Click to expand...
You're right, it ain't a pontiac, its a Mustang and most years have scoops. I think the windows look ok, but I would like to see the option.
Btw, with the looks of the '05, it ain't no sleeper, scoops or no.
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Jan 14, 2004
#13
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #13
well, having driven and owned a few 65/66 fastbacks (AKA 2+2's) both with quarter windows and with louvers...I would even thing of driving the '05 if the windows were replaced by a scoop or louvers...the blind spot is just enormous without the windows...


and the fact the they look just like the ones on a GT-350 is just gravy
 

sweet~Low~93

New Member
Oct 26, 2001
637
0
0
Toledo Ohio
Jan 15, 2004
#14
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #14
66 BLAKE 96 said:
For the record, Louvers are metal or plastic shades that attach to the outside of glass

VENTS are what the 65-68 fastbacks have.
Click to expand...


hey Blake-

Any pics of your 66 ?
they had 3 types right for 65-68 Vents, louvers or Open like shelbys

So you like the vents on your 66 , knob or something to open for air ?

i loved my 76 cobra II 1/4 windows. you could push them out to get air .



if you have any pics of 65-68 vents,louvers post them
 

tylers65

I've got your tool right here!
Jan 7, 2001
3,278
0
57
Tacoma, WA
Jan 16, 2004
#15
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #15
sweet~Low~93 said:
hey Blake-

Any pics of your 66 ?
they had 3 types right for 65-68 Vents, louvers or Open like shelbys

So you like the vents on your 66 , knob or something to open for air ?

i loved my 76 cobra II 1/4 windows. you could push them out to get air .



if you have any pics of 65-68 vents,louvers post them
Click to expand...

See my sig for a 65/66 fastback.
 

tylers65

I've got your tool right here!
Jan 7, 2001
3,278
0
57
Tacoma, WA
Jan 17, 2004
#16
  • Jan 17, 2004
  • #16
Pictures by sweet~low~93
 

Attachments

  • 05 Side with vent windows.webp
    4.6 KB · Views: 165

sweet~Low~93

New Member
Oct 26, 2001
637
0
0
Toledo Ohio
Jan 23, 2004
#17
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #17
Here are some pics you guys may like-
65-66 Mustang fastback w/ 1/4 window vents no spoiler

I think this would be the closest thing you to the 05'
if the 05' didn't have rear spoiler and added Vent in 1/4 windows

This is just to help you get a better idea of what the 05' mustang could look like.







~ Please VOTE if you view this tread ~


Some reason I don't think the attachments are Working- i added them and there not Showing up when it go's to tread- SN problems Still ?
 

Attachments

  • 05 Side with vent windows.webp
    4.6 KB · Views: 424

The Fireman

New Member
May 9, 2003
148
0
0
Lord of the Piston Rings
Jan 23, 2004
#18
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #18
Although it would cause a bit of a blind spot I'd prefer to have some scoops, louvers, or vents in place of the window. Actually I think it'd look the best if it was just smoothed over, and nothing was there.
 

sweet~Low~93

New Member
Oct 26, 2001
637
0
0
Toledo Ohio
Jan 25, 2004
#19
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #19
Bump ---
 
O

Omegalock

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
616
0
0
Jan 25, 2004
#20
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #20
I like the 1/4 window just fine. If anything was added it would be the scoops. The louvres....I dunno I can't get behind. I like some retro other retro makes me think of platform shoes with goldfish in them and the lourvres give me that vibe.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
455
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
71
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
588
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?