• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

'05 V6/GT vs. GTR head lights

  • Thread starter Thread starter Z28x
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Apr 8, 2004
#21
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #21
I think you misunderstood me. The 70's boss has lights that are not in those little black slots. Those are the ones I was refering to as extra.
 
S

SWortham

New Member
Jan 11, 2004
81
0
0
Apr 8, 2004
#22
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #22
Oh, yeah I got confused there.

Well at least you can see how similar the front of that '69 Boss 302 is to the '05 GT.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Apr 8, 2004
#23
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #23
Yeah I mainly see the 69 boss paint job. And the 70 boss headlights. Either way. I want one that is street legal.
 

notched86

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
305
1
0
Ruckersville, VA
Apr 8, 2004
#24
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #24
Am I the only one who thinks the GT-R looks absolutely hideous? Bleh..I hate that thing. It looks like it was designed by the cast of "2 Fast 2 Furious". The carbon fiber hood, 20 inch wheels, and huge rear wing just don't cut it for me. Anyone else here think Ford is trying to attract the import crowd with this concept? Seriously, they even have the GT-R badging!! I NEVER thought I would see a "GT-R" badge on a factory Ford car, it's like my worst nightmare come true.

I'm not sure if I love or hate those headlights though...I like the clean lines of the regular GT...anyone have a pic of that black Shelby '05?

I dunno, maybe it's the ugly orange/yellow paint...I think this thing would look alot better in black, or even Red. And the lines of the car don't flow at all. There's just WAY to much stuff going on with that car. Too much crap on it.
 
F

falchulk

New Member
Jan 23, 2004
178
0
0
Apr 8, 2004
#25
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #25
yellow5.0cobra said:
GTR-40?

That is the dumbest thing I have ever read.

If you refuse to call it GTR, put some effort into the name and call it GT-50R

GT-base name
50-5.0liters
R-Racing
Click to expand...


You do know the full name is gtr-40??????? go to google and type in gtr-40 and see how many returns you get.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Apr 8, 2004
#26
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #26
So you don't like actual race cars? I mean yeah maybe the 20 inch wheels are a little large. But the wing is actually useful. And carbon fiber is more then just decorative. And why not try to attract the import crowd?
The fast and furious crew never built any racecars. They were all show and go very slow.
 

Rampant

New Member
Mar 13, 2004
140
0
0
SoCal
Apr 8, 2004
#27
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #27
Not only that, it is a CONCEPT. For Pete's sake, it is SUPPOSED to be over-the-top. I am sorry to rant, but I am getting tired of all these rice-o-phobics bitching about a legitimate racing wing and a cf hood on a CONCEPT RACE car. Have you not read anything about it? Do you not know it is supposed to be a race car that resembles the old paint jobs/black hoods of racing MUSTANGS in the past? Are you that afraid of the import crowd? Please.

Personally, I think it is infinitely more tasteful the the '00 Cobra R that made it into production, but no one seems to want to bash that car.
[/rant]
 
Z

Z28x

New Member
Sep 19, 2003
644
0
0
Albany NY
Apr 8, 2004
#28
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #28
GTR-40???

So if it got built in 2006 it would be the GTR-42, that is so dumb.

I think Mustang GT-R is a fine name.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Apr 8, 2004
#29
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #29
Well since it is labeled on the car as GT-R. I would say Ford has decided what the name is.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Apr 8, 2004
#30
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #30
THe GTR headlights are blatantly/shamelessly taken from 70 Mustangs. The 05
s are closer to 65-69. I think they both look good.
 

notched86

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
305
1
0
Ruckersville, VA
Apr 8, 2004
#31
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #31
Rampant said:
Not only that, it is a CONCEPT. For Pete's sake, it is SUPPOSED to be over-the-top. I am sorry to rant, but I am getting tired of all these rice-o-phobics bitching about a legitimate racing wing and a cf hood on a CONCEPT RACE car. Have you not read anything about it? Do you not know it is supposed to be a race car that resembles the old paint jobs/black hoods of racing MUSTANGS in the past? Are you that afraid of the import crowd? Please.

Personally, I think it is infinitely more tasteful the the '00 Cobra R that made it into production, but no one seems to want to bash that car.
[/rant]
Click to expand...
I'm not afraid of the import crowd, it's just not my thing, I don't like it. I just don't like a huge carbon fiber wing or hood on my car. And the "dubs" don't do it for me either. I think the '00 Cobra R was WAY better than this GTR. The '00 R was just way cleaner looking. Everything was body color, and the lines of the car were beautiful, and the wheels were perfect. This GT-R is just a little excessive in my books, but it's a concept so I realize it's supposed to be excessive. The car is just too busy looking and gaudy. Too much going on. But then again, I've always been a fan of clean, sleeper looking cars.

Oh well, that's just me.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Apr 8, 2004
#32
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #32
notched86 said:
I'm not afraid of the import crowd, it's just not my thing, I don't like it. I just don't like a huge carbon fiber wing or hood on my car. The car is just too busy looking and gaudy. Too much going on. But then again, I've always been a fan of clean, sleeper looking cars.

Oh well, that's just me.
Click to expand...
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the srt-4 have a fairly big wing on it? And it's far from what I or many other people would call a sleeper. I realize that it's not a rice car. But it isn't exactly a tame looking neon.
 

The Fireman

New Member
May 9, 2003
148
0
0
Lord of the Piston Rings
Apr 9, 2004
#33
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #33
yellow5.0cobra said:
GTR-40?

That is the dumbest thing I have ever read.

If you refuse to call it GTR, put some effort into the name and call it GT-50R

GT-base name
50-5.0liters
R-Racing
Click to expand...

GT-50R? And you're calling me dumb?
 
F

falchulk

New Member
Jan 23, 2004
178
0
0
Apr 9, 2004
#34
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #34
Fords press release also says gtr-40
 
S

SWortham

New Member
Jan 11, 2004
81
0
0
Apr 9, 2004
#35
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #35
notched86 said:
I'm not afraid of the import crowd, it's just not my thing, I don't like it. I just don't like a huge carbon fiber wing or hood on my car. And the "dubs" don't do it for me either. I think the '00 Cobra R was WAY better than this GTR. The '00 R was just way cleaner looking. Everything was body color, and the lines of the car were beautiful, and the wheels were perfect. This GT-R is just a little excessive in my books, but it's a concept so I realize it's supposed to be excessive. The car is just too busy looking and gaudy. Too much going on. But then again, I've always been a fan of clean, sleeper looking cars.

Oh well, that's just me.
Click to expand...

I agree with you for the most part. I wouldn't buy one, because it's just not for me. I'd rather have a new Boss Mustang if & when Ford makes one. But all of those things that you say look bad on the GTR do have purpose.

The carbon fiber hood lowers weight in the front, therefore improving weight distribution. Carbon fiber hoods are also known to allow better cooling than a metal hood since it won't trap heat in the engine bay the same way.

The 20" wheels allow you to use a giant brake system which would have tons of stopping power and you'll probably never experience brake fade even during racing.

And of course the wing improves downforce. More downforce = Greater Traction = Better Lateral G numbers = A more effective race car
 

hollant

Founding Member
Mar 30, 2002
141
0
17
Puyallup, WA
Apr 9, 2004
#36
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #36
I am still in love with the original comcept car...
 

Attachments

  • MustangGTCoupConcept10.webp
    19.1 KB · Views: 193
  • MustangGTCoupConcept06.webp
    17.7 KB · Views: 198

hollant

Founding Member
Mar 30, 2002
141
0
17
Puyallup, WA
Apr 9, 2004
#37
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #37
The concept car is best front and back...
 

Attachments

  • MustangGTCoupConcept02.webp
    16 KB · Views: 198
F

falchulk

New Member
Jan 23, 2004
178
0
0
Apr 9, 2004
#38
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #38
hollant said:
I am still in love with the original comcept car...
Click to expand...

I disagree. I think the production car is much better. The concept car had a sanitary 2048 robotic look. The production version looks like a real car that we would see on the road. From the first time I saw it, I realized it would never make it out in that form.
 

hollant

Founding Member
Mar 30, 2002
141
0
17
Puyallup, WA
Apr 9, 2004
#39
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #39
I am certain that the designers and product managers have left a ton of room for improvement. Compare the 1982 Gt with the 1993 Cobra, or the 1995 Mustang with the current Cobra or the 64 Mustang with the 68 or which ever you like. The production 05 is rather vanilla and I am sure that the later cars will push the envelope quite a bit more!

I figure by the 45th anniversary car we will be looking at a much more agressive and much better looking car. Hopefully something like the original concept!
 

The Fireman

New Member
May 9, 2003
148
0
0
Lord of the Piston Rings
Apr 9, 2004
#40
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #40
falchulk said:
I disagree. I think the production car is much better. The concept car had a sanitary 2048 robotic look. The production version looks like a real car that we would see on the road. From the first time I saw it, I realized it would never make it out in that form.
Click to expand...



Yeah, I also like the production version better. I hated the way the concepts looked in the front, and back. And yeah, there was just NO WAY Ford was going to build a car like that. People should've known that after seeing the Mach III concept, and what actually made it to production back when it came out.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
129
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
179
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
S
Electrical No dash lights
  • slojoexxx
  • Dec 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
148
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 11, 2025
slojoexxx
S
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
803
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
D
97 V6 suspension upgrades
  • Dale1bre
  • Jan 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
329
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?