• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1.6 vs 1.7 RR?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmd2914
  • Start date Start date Jun 9, 2007
J

jmd2914

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2002
937
0
0
Napa, California
Jun 9, 2007
#1
  • Jun 9, 2007
  • #1
so i'm kinda new to the whole engine building thing, so let me see if i have this right. if i swapped from a 1.6 to a 1.7 it would be like swapping a cam with more duration right?
 

Mustang78

New Member
Feb 8, 2006
486
0
0
Aberdeen, WA
Jun 10, 2007
#2
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #2
kinda, a 1.7 pushes the valve down .031" more(on a .500" lift cam) than a 1.6 ratio..you can divide the lift by 1.6 or 1.7 to find the actual size of the cam and the differences it makes

~Mark~
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Jun 10, 2007
#3
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #3
You get increased lift but the total duration stays the same.
 
J

jmd2914

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2002
937
0
0
Napa, California
Jun 10, 2007
#4
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #4
so would it be more beneficial to use a different cam and use 1.6rr's?
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Jun 10, 2007
#5
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #5
It depends on what you're trying to accomplish. Putting more cam into an otherwise stock engine can have undesirable results like loss of low end torque and valve float on the high end. You have to build a package of parts that match to get good results. For example:

I have the mods listed in my sig line. In addition to those I'm getting ready to do a H/C/I install on my stock block that includes a B cam, Explorer intake, ported GT-40P heads with Manley 1.85/1.55 valves and double springs, FRPP 1.7 roller rockers, new lifters, Explorer 65MM TB and 26# Vette injectors. All of these parts are known to work well together with the exception of the Vette injectors and I'm going to get a custom burned chip to iron out that issue.
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Jun 10, 2007
#6
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #6
I heard that 1.7 add 3* of duration to.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Jun 10, 2007
#7
  • Jun 10, 2007
  • #7
Total duration is fixed by the cam and cannot be altered. The amount of duration that the valve is open beyond a specific point may be changed, either for the good or bad.
 
T

Twisted306

New Member
May 6, 2007
37
0
0
Jun 11, 2007
#8
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #8
0.480 lift divide 1.6 times 1.6 = 0.480
0.480 lift divide 1.6 times 1.7 = 0.510
0.500 lift divide 1.6 times 1.7 = 0.531
0.500 lift divide 1.6 times 1.6 = 0.500
0.500 lift divide 1.6 times 1.8 = 0.562
0.512 lift divide 1.6 times 1.7 = 0.544
i was shown like this can be pain n the butt to get right i was told 550 is max lift for the stock 5.0 short block any more valve will hit pistons and alway leave room if some thing happes like valve flow or missed a gear i dont run any more then 0.530 in a stock 5.0 short block valve braking off in the cly make one BIG mess
 
9

90bluegt

Founding Member
Dec 9, 1999
592
0
16
Jun 11, 2007
#9
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #9
I'm running higher than .550 lift on a stock 5.0 block, (out of an explorer) and i'm not hitting the pistons. My lift is around .577 that's with 1.7 rockers.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 11, 2007
#10
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #10
IMO 1.7 rockers are a waste because even on a stock engine, you can benefit from a mild cam and get better results than you'll ever see with a stock cam and 1.7s, also 1.7s put more of a bind on the valve geometry than is necessary. I've seen tons of otherwise bone stock 5.0s gain from E303 and equivalent cams. As mentioned, you're only gaining lift, which you can get plus duration from a cam swap.
 

Chietala

New Member
Sep 21, 2006
111
0
0
Sacramento
Jun 11, 2007
#11
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #11
Great info here.

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/0607phr_camshaft_basics/lifters_pushrods.html

 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jun 11, 2007
#12
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #12
i use 1.7 with a b-cam and it works well.

the b-cam has pretty low lift compared to other cams, it has.480 with a 1.7 rocker arm its around .510-.512 which works for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
659
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Opinions on a possible project car w/ pics
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
10
Views
198
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Mar 30, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
614
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Electrical Ron Francis Headlight / Alternator Harness
  • dan50
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
179
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2026
dan50
Engine Pushrod Length?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
339
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?