• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

1.7 roller rockers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94superstang
  • Start date Start date Sep 18, 2007

94superstang

New Member
Apr 26, 2007
76
0
0
Sep 18, 2007
#1
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #1
I'm thinking of adding on 1.7 roller rockers. Is it a good mod for a pretty much stock motor. Does it make a difference? What does the labor cost go for? My current mods are frpp cobra intake bbk cai fms 65 mm tb 3.73 gears a hyper tech chip and catback exhaust.
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Sep 19, 2007
#2
  • Sep 19, 2007
  • #2
How many miles are there on your motor? YOur valve springs may not like the 1.7 ratio with there age. I would personally wait on them till I did the heads (get stud mount heads and stud mount rockers, your current heads are pedestal mount). Theres also not a lot of hp gain in them. They can help reduce valve tip wear on motors with big lift cams and heavy valve springs, but that doesnt apply to you.

Oh and welcome to Stangnet. Better late than never.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Sep 19, 2007
#3
  • Sep 19, 2007
  • #3
The valve lift with the stock cam is increased from 0.444" to 0.472" by the 1.7 ratio rockers, and they also increase 0.050" lift cam duration by 3 degrees. The effect is like having a slightly bigger cam, and the result is something like a 6rwhp gain at higher revs but a slight torque loss lower down. It's a waste of time/money if you have stock, unported heads that are flow-limited at higher valve lifts. If you port the stock heads, higher ratio rockers would work better.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 19, 2007
#4
  • Sep 19, 2007
  • #4
I'd not do it
and
Since you are going to deal with labor charges

I'd really ... really ... not do it

I don't know your long term plans
but
If one is thinking about upgrading to better flowing Aluminum heads

I'd wait until then and go with stud mounts

To my way of thinking
ped rr's on a iron head is just not worth it :Word:
ALSO
They'll most likely make more noise than your OEM rockers

I've seen it said ..........
they put more wear and tear on your v guides and v springs

Grady
 

94superstang

New Member
Apr 26, 2007
76
0
0
Sep 19, 2007
#5
  • Sep 19, 2007
  • #5
Ok I'll just stay away from them than. I don't plan on adding a cam, Not sure about heads yet. I don't want to have to deal with all the tunning bussiness.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Sep 19, 2007
#6
  • Sep 19, 2007
  • #6
If you do go for the Cobra 1.7 roller rockers while you have the stock heads and later decide to upgrade to aftermarket aluminium heads, you won't be able to reuse those rockers unless you choose pedestal mount heads (most are stud mount). Your choice of camshaft will also be restricted to one that has less than 0.500" of valve lift with 1.6 ratio rockers so that you don't run into piston-to-valve clearance problems.
If aluminium heads are definitely in your plans, I'd follow Grady's advice and get stud mount heads with 1.6 ratio stud mount roller rockers. The stud mount heads already have pushrod guideplates and rocker studs, while the main advantage of the stud mount rockers is their adjustability, thus making it easy to set the lifter preload without needing to buy pedestal shims or different length pushrods. The TFS and Holley top end kits already include fully assembled heads, stud mount roller rockers, hardened pushrods, and taller valve covers so you don't need to piece everything together.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
700
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
712
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
Z
Engine New head for ‘88 mass air converted foxbody
  • zahirayunus
  • Dec 13, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
192
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2024
zahirayunus
Z
I
Engine What Camshaft?
  • Iceman1998
  • Oct 5, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
522
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2024
Noobz347
T
For Sale 1990 GT Convertible Resto-mod
  • teneck83
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
341
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 19, 2025
teneck83
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?