• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1 Chamber Flows?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MUSTANGJOE
  • Start date Start date Apr 14, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

MUSTANGJOE

Silver Stanger
Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,644
17
59
Apr 14, 2005
#1
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #1
Hey guys..

I'm ordering 2.5" tails for the stang, thing is I have 275/40/17 out back.will I have any fitting problems? Also I was thinking of ditching the 2 chamber and getting the 1 chamber flows!..Anyone ever heard this muffler?..does it still have that flowmaster sound or will it just be loud and final..?Thanks for the replys
 

blown1989saleen

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2001
1,397
0
37
oxford,pa
Apr 14, 2005
#2
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #2
why??? whats the purpose of going to a muffler that is basically designed for a track car that must run mufflers. IMHO anyone that runs 1 chamber flowmasters on a STREET car is "rice" sorry my OPINION
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 14, 2005
#3
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #3
Personally I wouldn't go with the 1 chambers. Three chamber sounds good, and it doesn't over power you on long trips. Not much power to be gained there.

I have 17x9 with 275s as well the clearance issue I have is with the Panhard Rod. I had to beg around a little to find a shop that was willing to put in the 2.5 exhaust. The odds of 3" are pretty slim

You shouldn't have any troubles. Good luck!
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Apr 14, 2005
#4
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #4
my buddy has them on his 4.6 and they sound like crap. I threatened him with calling the cops for violation of the sound ordinance if he didn't get real mufflers.
 

MUSTANGJOE

Silver Stanger
Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,644
17
59
Apr 14, 2005
#5
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #5
lol..you guys are funny!.

2 chambers it is

So I would'nt hit the tire with my 2.5" exhaust..?
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Apr 14, 2005
#6
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #6
they really sound like shiit? I thought they might sound good lol - do you think theyd sound good on a 347 stroker w/ fully straight pipes, no emissions -
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Apr 14, 2005
#7
  • Apr 14, 2005
  • #7
I had them on my 95. Made my mustang not sound like a mustang anymore. The car sounded like it was cammin a little harder. But sounded like crap.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 15, 2005
#8
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #8
MUSTANGJOE said:
lol..you guys are funny!.

2 chambers it is

So I would'nt hit the tire with my 2.5" exhaust..?
Click to expand...

Be aware that every car is different and that there will be production tolerances in the exhaust pipes that you buy. For the most part though you should be just fine.

After you get the pipes installed keep an eye on the clearances. Things will settle. My pipes actually settled into the plastic shroud over the fuel tank. Just a little scary.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Apr 15, 2005
#9
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #9
Paul Perreca said:
they really sound like shiit? I thought they might sound good lol - do you think theyd sound good on a 347 stroker w/ fully straight pipes, no emissions -
Click to expand...

On high compression engines they sound really good. It is the people who put them on stock cars that it ends up sounding horrible.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Apr 15, 2005
#10
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #10
ive got one chamber flows and an x pipe on my car and i think they sound great....well a lot better than the race bullets that i had on there. no more popping or sounding like a dump truck. i think the x pipe is what makes it sound like it does. it sounds more like a 4.6 than a 5.0 which kind of sucks...but it still has the low rumble of the 5.0
 
G

gt50stang89

New Member
Nov 11, 2003
124
0
0
East Greenville, PA
Apr 15, 2005
#11
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #11
ive had 2 chambers, spintech pro-streets, 1 chambers, and dynomax bullets, the 1 chambers were by far the best sounding and this was on a pretty much stock engine with offroad H. Do you really want it to sound like every other mustang out there w/ 2 chambers? 1 chambers get my vote
 

mricci

Member
Aug 17, 2003
301
0
17
Massachusetts
Apr 15, 2005
#12
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #12
my friend has an f-150 with a 351W in it. He doesnt have dual exhaust on it, so its only one. But it sounds good, not real loud until you get on it.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 15, 2005
#13
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #13
1 chambers are rice? I'm not trying to pick a fight but some of you guys make it out like if it's not to your liking, then it's "rice".

Personally, we always just cut the back end off of our 2 chambers, since we werent running tail pipes anyway. Sounds mean as hell and i'm pretty sure it couldnt hurt in the flow department, although it *might* have been ricey
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Apr 15, 2005
#14
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #14
I have 1 chamber flows on and they sound great. They sound similar to the single chamber borla's I had on my old 5.0, only better. Single chamber flows, dynomax bullets or any other similar muffler sound extremly loud when they are dumped. If you are running them with tails, they won't drone loud or be too raspy. Mine aren't. You will be very happy with the single chamber flows if you get 'em.
 

MUSTANGJOE

Silver Stanger
Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,644
17
59
Apr 15, 2005
#15
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #15
I have 2 chambers dumped right now..but I would like to put the tailpipe back on cause its missing that flowmaster sound a little..I need that hollowy throaty sound
 
8

87GT 306

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
260
0
0
Springfield MA
Apr 15, 2005
#16
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #16
I know someone with flowmaster series 1 and they sound real good. It wont sound like a mustang and will not sound like $hit unless u put them on a stock motor. It wont be "ricey" either as someone stated. IMO its not rice unless its got a APC or arospeed etc etc. stamp on it.
 

Funhog

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
219
0
0
Alabama
Apr 15, 2005
#17
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #17
I got the stock 225/55/16 all around with 2.5" pipes. I got maybe, maybe an inch between the pipes and the tires. I want to go with 245 in the rear but I am afraind to, and I hear spacers are s**t. Unless someone knows what to do if I get spacers.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Apr 15, 2005
#18
  • Apr 15, 2005
  • #18
my only experience is with a 4.6 with tail pipes and yeah it's loud, extremely loud. but it sounds like crap. His car sounds like a dump truck. the best way i can describe it is disgusting. but we all have personal preference. some like it loud, regardless of tone. it's like music, just because it's loud doesn't mean it's good...
 

UMDSmith

Member
Feb 10, 2004
226
0
17
Salisbury, Maryland
Apr 16, 2005
#19
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #19
I have full 2.5" with the 245's. No fitment problems on the 89 LX. I also have ravin performance exhaust mufflers, which I'm chucking soon. They are VERY sedate, and actually keep the car fairly tame, even under accel.
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Apr 16, 2005
#20
  • Apr 16, 2005
  • #20
if you get a nice cam, 2 chamb flows are sick, heres a video of mine, and ill post some pics of clearance, im not sure exactly what the shop did cause the previous owner did it, but here it is..
Video: http://nicjakgraphicz.homestead.com/files/IMAG0012.AVI

PICS: (these are 17x9, with nitto 555zr 275/40/17)


 

Attachments

  • IMAG0461.webp
    7.8 KB · Views: 98
  • IMAG0460.webp
    9.3 KB · Views: 107
  • IMAG0459.webp
    6.1 KB · Views: 116
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
467
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
267
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Monday at 9:00 AM
optionizerSS
O
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
752
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
86_Capri
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?