• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

1966 351 swap exhaust manifold

  • Thread starter Thread starter gpp
  • Start date Start date Feb 3, 2010
G

gpp

Member
Jul 3, 2005
137
0
16
Feb 3, 2010
#1
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #1
40 years ago i put a 351 in a 1966 mustang using stock exhaust manifolds.needless to say i ran into the same problems then that everyone is running into now.now,40 years later has anyone come up with a solution to this problem other than a torch and a ford hammer?i dont want big tube headers,700$ headers,or any solution that almost fits.you would think there would be a stock exhaust manifold that would fit but we never found one.so i ask the younger generation,or older, what are you doing for this problem?
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Feb 3, 2010
#2
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #2
Cleveland or Windsor?
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Feb 3, 2010
#3
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #3
If it's a 351w, Headman makes a real reasonable set. When I put my 351w in my 68, the headers I bought said they were swap headers for 65-68 Mustangs. I think they were only like 150$.
 
G

gpp

Member
Jul 3, 2005
137
0
16
Feb 3, 2010
#4
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #4
windsor,and putting them in 67 and later isnt a problem since the shock towers are wider.and thats part of the problem,products made for say 65 to 68 dont fit the 65 and 66 very well,if at all,so thats why i wanted to see if someone has done it without clearance problems.
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Feb 3, 2010
#5
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #5
gpp said:
windsor,and putting them in 67 and later isnt a problem since the shock towers are wider.and thats part of the problem,products made for say 65 to 68 dont fit the 65 and 66 very well,if at all,so thats why i wanted to see if someone has done it without clearance problems.
Click to expand...

I have a set of those headman headers I had in my 66 with a 351W. They fit without any denting, massaging, cutting etc, even had good clearance for a clutch cable. $100+shipping if you want them. I have 351C heads so I can't use them anymore. I'll even clean them up and put some black high temp header paint on them for you.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Feb 5, 2010
#6
  • Feb 5, 2010
  • #6
I have the Heddman swap headers. They're great for the price... definitely offer better exhaust flow (you can tell from the sond), better sound (deeper), and they fit well.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 5, 2010
#7
  • Feb 5, 2010
  • #7
Kinda pointless to swap in a 351 and choke it with the 289 manifolds. Get the Hedman's.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 5, 2010
#8
  • Feb 5, 2010
  • #8
Maverick/Comet guys putting 351w use stock Mav 302 manifolds on the engine if they are too cheap to get headers. They are tight but work.

So you might wonder what the difference in engine bay is...
Same width as 65-66, but shorter. Firewall is closer to the back of the engine.
The Stang should be able to use the 289 HiPo knock off manifolds.
The Mav uses the same manifold on the driver side. The passenger side though uses a short log because of the firewall clearance, the Hipo won't fit.

I would suggest Mav v8 manifolds unless you want to spring for a repop set of Hipos... But if you did that, you could just do the headers.
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Feb 6, 2010
#9
  • Feb 6, 2010
  • #9
ratio411 said:
Maverick/Comet guys putting 351w use stock Mav 302 manifolds on the engine if they are too cheap to get headers. They are tight but work.

So you might wonder what the difference in engine bay is...
Same width as 65-66, but shorter. Firewall is closer to the back of the engine.
The Stang should be able to use the 289 HiPo knock off manifolds.
The Mav uses the same manifold on the driver side. The passenger side though uses a short log because of the firewall clearance, the Hipo won't fit.

I would suggest Mav v8 manifolds unless you want to spring for a repop set of Hipos... But if you did that, you could just do the headers.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen you in a whille!
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Mar 12, 2010
#10
  • Mar 12, 2010
  • #10
68stang351 said:
I haven't seen you in a whille!
Click to expand...

Got rid of my Maverick, son has my F150, never had a Stang, and don't even have my Z28 anymore... So I don't get around the car forums much anymore.

I traded my last Maverick for a 94 5.0 convertible for my son so he could have a newer car. My 2nd son is mechanically inept, so an old Ford was out.

My uncle has a 73 Mach that is pretty much disassembled. If I could catch up on bills (bad economy), I could talk him out of that. But it is not in the cards right now.

I only get around Stangnet now when I am working on my oldest son's Fox body, or my 2nd's 94 GT. Otherwise it's Facebook for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
574
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
136
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
601
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?