• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

1st time @ track 02 gt vs. 04 Mach

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltaboxr1
  • Start date Start date Aug 29, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
D

deltaboxr1

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
11
0
0
Corning,NY
Aug 29, 2004
#1
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #1
I went to NYIRP Friday night.My first time ever running the car.I have a 02 gt pretty much stock,I was on stock wheels and goodyears.My first run was against a stock 04 mach1 on stock goodyears. It was 81 deg. and 100% relative humidity! Traction was a big issue,I need a set of drag radials bad.Does my mph and 1/4 seem about right with my 60' ??
I ran 60' 2.315 1/4 14.438 @99.52 mach1 60' 2.224 1/4 14.045 @102.21
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Aug 29, 2004
#2
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #2
Both of you need to learn how to launch. Youd be in the flat 14s w/ a 1.9-2.0 60ft. The mach driver needs to be slapped he should be in the mid 13s w/ a decent 60.
 
D

DJT03GT

New Member
Oct 27, 2003
187
0
0
New Jersey
Aug 29, 2004
#3
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #3
Other then your 60ft everything looks pritty normal for you. 60ft could be a little lower, different tires would definately help that out.
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Aug 29, 2004
#4
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #4
BigHairyMonkey said:
Both of you need to learn how to launch. Youd be in the flat 14s w/ a 1.9-2.0 60ft. The mach driver needs to be slapped he should be in the mid 13s w/ a decent 60.
Click to expand...
Agreed the mach driver needs to wake up a little.. In defense of 'delta,' its hard launching with 18's. When I went to the track first time it was with 18's and I couldn't pull anything below sub 2.3's on the 60..

Both of you were definately spinning thru first.
 
D

deltaboxr1

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
11
0
0
Corning,NY
Aug 29, 2004
#5
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #5
wms004 said:
Agreed the mach driver needs to wake up a little.. In defense of 'delta,' its hard launching with 18's. When I went to the track first time it was with 18's and I couldn't pull anything below sub 2.3's on the 60..

Both of you were definately spinning thru first.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the support, but I was on stock 17" bullits w/ stock 245 goodyears
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Aug 29, 2004
#6
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #6
Deltaboxr1 - not that it matters, but i really wouldn't call your car stock...
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Aug 29, 2004
#7
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #7
density altitude?
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Aug 30, 2004
#8
  • Aug 30, 2004
  • #8
wms004 said:
Agreed the mach driver needs to wake up a little.. In defense of 'delta,' its hard launching with 18's. When I went to the track first time it was with 18's and I couldn't pull anything below sub 2.3's on the 60..

Both of you were definately spinning thru first.
Click to expand...



my buddy cut a 1.865 60ft last night at the track. he has chrome 18x9.5 2000 cobra R's, with 275/35 street tire rubber on them. needless to say we were all shocked
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Aug 30, 2004
#9
  • Aug 30, 2004
  • #9
c2see21 said:
my buddy cut a 1.865 60ft last night at the track. he has chrome 18x9.5 2000 cobra R's, with 275/35 street tire rubber on them. needless to say we were all shocked
Click to expand...
wow.. he slips clutch very well. which street tires if you don't mind me asking.. ia've got 275/35's as well.. but they are kumho 712's which blow for launching.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 30, 2004
#10
  • Aug 30, 2004
  • #10
Thats actually a pretty quick time for a 2.3+ 60ft. Better than average for a stock '99-up GT
 
C

codyGT

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
365
0
0
Nebraska
Aug 30, 2004
#11
  • Aug 30, 2004
  • #11
Psssst, Most Mach1's are high 13 second cars. I've only seen modded ones run better.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Aug 30, 2004
#12
  • Aug 30, 2004
  • #12
sounds like the track wasnt prepped very well.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Aug 30, 2004
#13
  • Aug 30, 2004
  • #13
wms004 said:
wow.. he slips clutch very well. which street tires if you don't mind me asking.. ia've got 275/35's as well.. but they are kumho 712's which blow for launching.
Click to expand...



i think they are yokohama avs100's, i will double check with him later though. that was the only 60ft he cut like that, the rest were 2.0-2.1, which is still not bad at all, especially since it was his first time at the track
 

DTMach1

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
240
0
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Aug 30, 2004
#14
  • Aug 30, 2004
  • #14
you're times are pretty much on par...like others have posted, you knock down your 60ft, your ET's will follow.

as far as the mach, he trapped a little lower than I would've expected...with that 60ft he should've been high 13's not low 14's...

probably track prep is what got you...
 
B

big T

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
265
0
0
Hawaii, oahu
Aug 30, 2004
#15
  • Aug 30, 2004
  • #15
deltaboxr1 said:
I went to NYIRP Friday night.My first time ever running the car.I have a 02 gt pretty much stock,I was on stock wheels and goodyears.My first run was against a stock 04 mach1 on stock goodyears. It was 81 deg. and 100% relative humidity! Traction was a big issue,I need a set of drag radials bad.Does my mph and 1/4 seem about right with my 60' ??
I ran 60' 2.315 1/4 14.438 @99.52 mach1 60' 2.224 1/4 14.045 @102.21
Click to expand...
Ive raced a mach-1 and ran a 13.9@99 mph to his 13.5@103 mph(5-speed) about a month ago. That mach 1 has run a 13.3@ 104 mph as witnessed by me, stock I might add, while most lightly modded 99+GT's (gears, exhaust, CAI) run anywhere from 13.7-14.2@100-98mph. Just depends on track prep, temp, driver and altitude.
 
C

codyGT

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
365
0
0
Nebraska
Aug 31, 2004
#16
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #16
What is everyones definition of stock when talking about Mach1's?

How is a car with less than 340fwhp running low 13's? And don't give me the under rated story. They even weigh a tad bit more than a GT too.
 

ttown

Founding Member
May 30, 2002
815
0
0
Oklahoma
Aug 31, 2004
#17
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #17
codyGT said:
Psssst, Most Mach1's are high 13 second cars. I've only seen modded ones run better.
Click to expand...

No most drivers are high 13 second drivers, it's not the cars fault. Learn how to launch and where to shift your car wheather it's a 5 speed or auto and times will vastly improve. It was a big learning curve for me going from a 2 valve to a 4 valve motor. Practice makes perfect, a lot of drivers take their cars to the track a few times to see what they will do and have fun, those are the people running these times.
 

TR03Mach1

Member
May 31, 2002
450
0
16
New Castle, Delaware USA
Aug 31, 2004
#18
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #18
ttown said:
No most drivers are high 13 second drivers, it's not the cars fault. Learn how to launch and where to shift your car wheather it's a 5 speed or auto and times will vastly improve. It was a big learning curve for me going from a 2 valve to a 4 valve motor. Practice makes perfect, a lot of drivers take their cars to the track a few times to see what they will do and have fun, those are the people running these times.
Click to expand...

Amen, brother! I took my Mach 1 just as it came from the dealership (can't get much more "stock" than that!), and turned a 13.19 @105. Took it back to the track over a year later with a few mods done to it, but couldn't match the time it laid down stock!! The trap speed increased from 105 to 107-108mph, but the et wouldn't come in any lower than a 13.2!
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Aug 31, 2004
#19
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #19
TR03Mach1 said:
Amen, brother! I took my Mach 1 just as it came from the dealership (can't get much more "stock" than that!), and turned a 13.19 @105. Took it back to the track over a year later with a few mods done to it, but couldn't match the time it laid down stock!! The trap speed increased from 105 to 107-108mph, but the et wouldn't come in any lower than a 13.2!
Click to expand...
Stock I never got mine below 13.9, but I only tried 3 passes a week after I got the car. The next day I had the exhaust put on & when I brought it back out I hit 13.5@105. My 60 foot's are pathetic though. I've never bested 2.2 60'. Near plans include beefing the rear to run X10.5 Drag Radials. That should drop my time to hopeully either a 13 flat or 12.9.
 

MAC[H]Z

New Member
Mar 9, 2004
152
0
0
NH
Aug 31, 2004
#20
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #20
Bone stock I ran 13.5 and it was the first time at the track in 10+ years.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2013 MUSTANG GT AUTOMATIC 315 GEARS ALL STOCK 950 MILES 0-60 TIMES ANYBODY GOT O-60 TIMES
  • geneo4116
  • Apr 18, 2012
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
5K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 18, 2012
geneo4116
Went to the track tonight.
  • MyHoFoSho
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
940
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2009
82CapriRS
Finally Some Good Track Times!!!
  • sneaky98gt
  • Nov 6, 2009
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2009
ran260gt
R
O
1st time at the track
  • o0Dan0o
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
2K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Apr 26, 2008
ct07gt
new track times 9/5/07
  • blown93feature
  • Sep 6, 2007
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
633
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 6, 2007
anticubicle
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?